So, it's time to talk about #aliens.

Is the search for #intelligent #life just an impossible search for a microscopic pin within a mountain-sized haystack? Or is there a way to try and be smart about how we search?

A thread about some work I've been involved with that addresses this question... (1/n)

If you enjoy the thread, and you think others may do too, then please #boost it!

Before we get into the nitty gritty, a little digression. You'll see the relevance shortly.

Imagine being offered a suitcase full of money if you manage to meet up with a complete stranger that day in #NewYork city. You don't know where. You don't know when. And you know nothing about the stranger other than that they have been made the same offer as you.

Somehow you need to #cooperate to win, but you can't #communicate because you don't know who to communicate with.

What do you do? (2/n)

This is a famous problem posed by #ThomasSchelling, a #Nobel prize winning #economist and a founding father of #GameTheory. He's also credited with the #ColdWar doctrine of #MutuallyAssuredDestruction, but that's another story.

This is an example of a game of cooperation between two non-communicating participants. And Schelling argued that there is a strategy that maximises the chance of success. (3/n)

The idea is that both need to consider likely meeting points. Natural choices would be famous landmarks or meeting spots. Outside the #EmpireStateBuilding? The lobby of #GrandCentralStation? There's maybe a few dozen spots people might go for. But that's a lot less than the number of buildings in #NewYork.

And a meeting time? Maybe noon, or 6pm. Maybe not 2.27 or 4.38. There seem to be preferred choices. #Schelling called these #FocalPoints. Today they're often called #SchellingPoints. (4/n)

So where do #aliens come into this? The Search for #ExtraterrestrialIntelligence, or #SETI, is a two player game involving us and them. Whoever they are.

We are basically playing an #interstellar version of the strangers meeting in #NewYork. But the incentive in this case isn't a suitcase full of money. It's the opportunity to establish contact.

Both parties must want to do so of course. But it'd be amazing if intelligent life is common yet we're the only ones wanting to say hello (5/n)

In 2018/19 I asked my Masters student, Andreea Dogaru, to investigate the potential #detectability of #Earth from other #star systems, assuming other #civilisations might use similar techniques to those we use to find #exoplanets. She did a great job and her dissertation showed from what regions of the sky Earth might be most detectable. (6/n)
https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/a-new-strategy-for-seti-earth-as-an-exoplanet(8504194f-af3a-4e19-abf1-5bbe5f51b46b).html
A New Strategy for SETI: Earth as an Exoplanet | Research Explorer | The University of Manchester

One of the very few upsides of the #covid #pandemic is that it gave me more time to think a little more about Earth's detectability. Borrowing directly from the strangers in New York problem, i wrote a paper that put forward the idea of #MutualDetectability as a strategy for deciding which directions of the sky we might focus on to listen or for #SETI signals. (7/n)
So let's imagine there's an #alien #civilisation who, like us, wants to know if anyone else is out there. A good starting point might be to make use of naturally occurring signals at both ends that both sides can see and that indicate life could exist at the other end. If both sides recognise the natural signal and both realise the other may too then that's a strong #SchellingPoint. (8/n)

Even if one side is far more advanced, for the chances of #FirstContact to be maximised there needs to be #cooperative game play. This means both need to choose a #signal the other side may know about, even if they aren't as advanced.

A pretty simple signal is the #transit signal that occurs when a #planet passes directly in front of its #HostStar as seen by a distant observer. The #NASA #Kepker mission found thousands of #exoplanets this way (9/n)

@eamonn_kerins The problem as I see it though - is let's say that we happen to be the advanced civilisation (yeah I know - imagine...)

Let's say the other planet is roughly where we were around the 14th century. There is a significant chance that any signal we send could arrive before they are advanced enough to spot it.

And the same in the other direction, surely the signal they send would have to be at least 300+ years ago for it to arrive when we started looking.

@asjmcguire @eamonn_kerins itโ€™s worse than that. If you consider the age of our galaxy and even just consider a very generous species duration of 10M years, itโ€™s very unlikely to find another species whose existence overlaps with ours temporally within a short enough distance to communicate at the speed of light. I love the idea of SETI, but even just our galaxy is too big and life too brief for species to connect.
@jeffkirvin @asjmcguire i think your conclusion of very unlikely depends on the density of intelligent civilisations at any given time. And we are only just beginning to place interesting limits on that. We learn by looking.
@asjmcguire @eamonn_kerins Fair enough, and I wish you luck! Iโ€™d love to be wrong here.
@jeffkirvin @eamonn_kerins oh absolutely - I'm just enjoying the conversation, it's not often we get the chance as "lay people" to have these discussions. Obviously I hope very much that we find that we are not alone.
@asjmcguire @jeffkirvin enjoyed the chat. I'll sign of for bed i think. Thanks for the interest.