Quite a few #disinformation researchers on #Mastodon now, from all different fields & instances.

Why not connect & share content!
Let's try this group thingy for #infoops #InformationOperations #HybridWarfare #InformationWarfare #infowar #SemanticOperations #misinformation #conspiracy #InformationManipulation etc, etc, etc.. (wow so many different #!)

You can follow &
Tag @disinformation to boost your toots.

And yes, I know, we as "#disinformation" researchers are a pedantic lot in terms of, well, "terms".

That could be the point of the group @disinformation, to share and compare approaches, taxonomy, methodology and ethics.

Could this be of interest to you? @marie_peltier @denkolesnyk @emmalbriant @TheoLenoir @Sina @claesdevreese @jfarkas et Al ...

@stephlamy @disinformation @marie_peltier @denkolesnyk @TheoLenoir @Sina @jfarkas @claesdevreese I appreciate you doing this, but I reject forcing us into a disinformation discipline because it ignores the rest of propaganda of which it is one part, a part that cannot be understood without conceiving and researching propaganda more broadly. This is shaping the field around a misunderstanding that’s conceptually misleading
@stephlamy @disinformation @marie_peltier @denkolesnyk @TheoLenoir @Sina @jfarkas @claesdevreese If there were to be a group, it would need to be a propaganda group, which could embrace propaganda scholars like me as well as disinfo scholars. A disinfo group cannot embrace what I study or even understand disinformation, as disinformation is a sub-type that excludes focus on the rest of propaganda.
@stephlamy @disinformation @marie_peltier @denkolesnyk @TheoLenoir @Sina @jfarkas @claesdevreese I would be really grateful if you did something broader that doesn’t exclude people in the discipline by definition.

@emmalbriant @stephlamy @disinformation @marie_peltier @denkolesnyk @TheoLenoir @jfarkas @claesdevreese

I find discussions about definitions fascinating and fully support anyone who wants to bring relevant people together. #disinformation or "foreign information manipulation and interference" #Fimi as I call what I am working on is so complex, connected to so many other relevant fields (like hate speech, conspiracies etc) and I think that is the exciting part about this.

However, it also means we sometimes have to use terminology that we don't 100% agree with to bring all of us together. I'm also not working on "disinformation" as it's commonly defined, but I'm happy to discuss this with anyone who works on the issue at large and wants to learn more, engage and share their views 

So, everyone, ask me what FIMI is 

@Sina asking what #FIMI is ;)

Is it in any way related to de Jean-Baptiste Jeangène Vilmer, Alexandre Escorcia, Marine Guillaume & Janaina Herrera's report on #InformationManipulations ?

@potemkinvillage

https://www.irsem.fr/institut/actualites/rapport-conjoint-caps-irsem.html

Rapport conjoint CAPS / IRSEM

Lancement du rapport conjoint CAPS / IRSEM « LES MANIPULATIONS DE L'INFORMATION Un défi pour nos démocraties »

@stephlamy @potemkinvillage

Yes indeed 😁 so the reason why I am not a fan of the concept of #disinformation so much is because the definition almost exclusively focuses on the content, leaving out the important focus on the manipulative tactics, techniques and procedures (TTPs) that such actors employ. So there's more that we are interested in than the content, right? We want to know about the fake accounts, fake websites and fake experts (and unfortunately mich more) that might be involved in such coordinated activities.

And that's why I think disinformation is only one aspect of the manipulation, in addition to all the other manipulative behaviour:

So, "FIMI is a pattern of behaviour that threatens or has the potential to negatively impact values, procedures and political processes. Such activity is manipulative in character, conducted in an intentional and coordinated manner. Actors of such activity can be state or non-state actors, including their proxies inside and outside of their own territory"

https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/2021-stratcom-activity-report-strategic-communication-task-forces-and-information-analysis_en

Tell me what you think, looking forward to the discussion 

2021 StratCom activity report - Strategic Communication Task Forces and Information Analysis Division | EEAS Website

Foreign information manipulation and interference, including disinformation, has been identified by the EU as a serious threat to our security and democracy.

@Sina I think I just wrote a book on that ;)
My approach is looking at the patterns of behavior. Inferring tactics. Putting them in a broader strategy (currently looking at how RU strat aligns with #abuserstrategy).
But also, the more "meta" approach of understanding how those actors (uncivil society) socialise (epistemic communities) and persuade (inauthentic/misleading arenas, discourse, amplification on/offline) in order to contest liberal norms or promote illiberal ones.
@potemkinvillage
@stephlamy @potemkinvillage oh really?? Congratulations 🎊 and you probably shared the info somewhere already, but what's your book called?
@stephlamy @potemkinvillage yeah, never mind, I saw you have it in your bio 😁 good thing I'm polishing up on my French, looking forward to reading it! And congratulations again!
@Sina ☺️ Thx! Do let me know if you feel it's helpful (and yes, there are definitions in there as well 😅 ) @potemkinvillage