I've been thinking about Mastodon vs Twitter and positioning. It's a neat case study on understanding value vs features.

Mastodon has many differentiated features - federated servers, content moderation, no ads, etc. But the opportunity for them is to clearly position the value those features enable. Example - users should understand the value of decentralization (no company owns your data) vs. seeing this as simply something different from Twitter and kind of a pain. #positioning #marketing

@aprildunford this would be the work of a good salesperson, that is to articulate those features into benefits (or value as you indicated). Some people can make the connection between those features and benefits. For some, the cost of those features seem too high ( ie., it's too complicated to learn) so maybe there's not enough value for the cost.
@rjwyatt Certainly sales needs to communicate this but marketing and communications do too. Right now I think Mastodon has an opportunity to really embrace the new users that are flooding on to the platform. Simple, clear communication around their value could help keep those folks on the platform.
@aprildunford @rjwyatt Agree… but the challenge is, does Mastodon have a marketing or communications team to articulate the narrative?
@aprildunford This is spot on. Same line of thinking highlights the flaws in the "Uber for X" shorthand ppl used to rely on. For instance at Vidyard ppl said: "YouTube for business"... great for conveying it did something video, but failed to capture the differentiated features like robust video analytics, CRM integration, ability to swap videos while maintaining link (the very things that added up to differentiated value for businesses). Really the only thing we did that YT did was hosting!
@gadway Exactly, exactly - It's really hard to define yourself in relation to another company, particularly when we may have different associations with that company.
@aprildunford Exactly! “not centralized” is a feature not user valie. Maybe “not xyz” works when xyz comes with known user benefits/challenges. Salesforce’s “not software” is an interesting case and it was successful because it differentiated itself from competitors in a clear and succinct way. Otherwise, “software” is not directly about user benefit and may be closer to a product feature but the user benefits from not having to manage ownership of a software was clear.
@zad I was competing with Salesforce when they launched the "no software" thing and when they did they were very clear about the value - you could use CRM even if you didn't have an IT department. The alternatives at the time all needed IT to get it up and running. "No Software" was the equivalent of Avis's famous "We try harder" vs Hertz.
@aprildunford what exactly is your “kind of a pain”?
@Tom_Huth I think most new folks signing up don't understand why they have to choose a server and loads of them just quit at that step. Folks don't know how to choose or even if the choice is important or not.

@aprildunford @Tom_Huth this definitely stopped me the first time I looked at Mastodon.

A message like "Don't worry, you can easily change later'" would go a long way in this case.

@nilsdavis @aprildunford The message is there.
I searched upfront and then was confident a change of instances would not be a big deal. https://mastodon.help/
Mastodon Help - Guide

A thorough introduction to Mastodon

Mastodon Help - Instances

Recommended Mastodon instances

@aprildunford Agreed. I'm also not sure if the server I had chosen is right one for me🤔.
But it's not dramatic because we can pick another server or instance and switch to the new one. https://mastodon.help/
I think we'll see what happens. Here it's in our hands, not in the hands of a crazy billionaire.
Mastodon Help - Guide

A thorough introduction to Mastodon

@aprildunford You're right, (as usual) it is really interesting and may get more interesting over time.

If Mastodon continues to grow, even slowly, one thing that may help amplify that unique positioning is further feature differentiation. Mastodon is a relatively small population spread across a modest number of federated servers that differentiate largely based on content policies today. But what if the servers start to differentiate in other ways?

For instance, what if membership in a server is based on completing a KYC (know your customer) style identity verification to prove who you are? Or what if it is based on regular membership dues to cover costs and add new features to the platform? What if a community wanted to use their collective buying power to support journalism and license access to third party content based on a negotiated group license? Those servers, and mastodon as a whole, would be positioned in a completely new way than where they are today, all because of the core positioning they started with.

@grantwood Seriously - there are so many cool opportunities! I love the idea of servers being more like communities. I can't wait to see where it all goes.

@aprildunford I am seeing these servers as simpler, digital versions of the city-states that Neal Stephenson wrote about in The Diamond Age.

Today what we call being in a media “bubble” may actually evolve into more complex self-organizing communities based on a shared sets of values. Those shared values are the foundation for new society / culture to emerge.

It’s already happening. It has profound implications for brands.

@aprildunford @mirzawriting thank you for stepping in on this! "*Why* should we care about federation?"

@aprildunford You can launch as "we're opposed to the other guys"

You can only succeed long term by saying "This is what we're best at."

I think we're a long way from there just now. :)

@trevorlongino Totally agree with this.

@aprildunford Also nice to see you over here from Twitter.

It's much quieter here than the firehose that is Twitter. 😋

@aprildunford what is potentially interesting is that you could set up a #marketing Mastodon Server in a vertical and establish yourself as the home for a topic, not just a voice.

This is only possible in this federated model...
And especially at this point in time.

Hotrolledsteel.social

Or

Marketing.social

@stevendavis Has anyone done something like that?
@aprildunford - I'm helping set one up on disability. I have seen a business example yet

@stevendavis @aprildunford

That sounds like a good idea, Steven

I’m wondering how broad or narrow the topic should be

Maybe can just copy some of the existing topic tags in Twitter 🤔

@aprildunford
I find it a plus that it has a learning curve that most "haters" won't be able to comprehend.
Learning is fun. i really like the entire system from what i can see so far.

@aprildunford oh heck yes. i’ve been hoping you’d share thoughts on positioning for Mastodon!

been super interesting scrolling through all the comments here.

@aprildunford People say "Mastodon is complicated". ☹️ Thinking out loud, how about telling new users that Mastodon is "just like email"?
✅ There's many mail providers you can sign up with using different "domains" like gmail.com, outlook.com or bestfriends.org
✅ Different people can have the same "name" on different providers like [email protected], [email protected] or [email protected]
✅ All providers can communicate with each other
✅ You can even set up your own private mail service.
@kurtsh I've seen some folks make that comparison! It works in a lot of ways I think. On the other hand I think it loses out on the central value of it as a social network, and the discovery capabilities that come with that.

@aprildunford How so?
✅ Searching for people & hashtags works across the entire federated network
✅ People can follow anyone anywhere in any community in the network
✅ People can view feeds that span the entire federated network (& you can view a local feed too, focused on local discussion)

...and Masto provides the added value of:
✅ Local admin-managed banning/suspension
✅ Admin defederation of entire (toxic) communities
✅ EDITING OF TOOTS! 😁

@aprildunford

> the opportunity for them is to clearly position the value

It's up to us though. There is no "them" here it's us. All of us are in it together.

@aprildunford this is a fun exercise! Is it just me or is their winning positioning move right now: we're not Twitter? 😅