Temporal Theology and Civilizational Time: An Interfaith Analysis of Easter, Islamic Calendrical Systems, and the Iran–Israel Paradigm

Author: Joshua Shipepe Hadula

Abstract

This paper examines the intersection of religious calendars, theology, and geopolitical identity through the lens of Easter in Christianity and its contrast with Islamic temporal frameworks. By analyzing the Christian lunisolar calculation of Easter alongside the Islamic lunar calendar, the study explores how differing conceptions of time reflect deeper theological divergences—particularly concerning the figure of Jesus Christ. Furthermore, the paper situates these differences within the contemporary geopolitical context of Iran and Israel, arguing that calendrical systems are not merely tools of timekeeping but expressions of civilizational identity, authority, and metaphysical truth. Drawing on interdisciplinary scholarship from theology, astronomy, and political thought, this work proposes that Easter functions as a symbolic fault line between Abrahamic traditions.

1. Introduction

Time, within religious traditions, is not neutral. It is structured, interpreted, and imbued with theological meaning. Among the Abrahamic faiths, Christianity, Islam, and Judaism each employ distinct calendrical systems that reflect their doctrinal foundations. Easter, the central feast of Christianity, offers a unique case study: it is both astronomically calculated and theologically decisive, commemorating the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

In contrast, Islam rejects the crucifixion and resurrection narrative, thereby eliminating any theological need for an Easter equivalent. Judaism, meanwhile, situates its sacred chronology around Passover, a historical and covenantal event. These differences extend beyond ritual practice and enter the realm of civilizational identity, particularly in regions where religion and politics intersect, such as Iran and Israel.

This paper explores how Easter serves as an analytical bridge between theology, calendar science, and geopolitical consciousness.

2. The Christian Construction of Easter: A Lunisolar Theology

Easter is determined as the first Sunday following the first full moon after the vernal equinox. This formula, formalized at the Council of Nicaea in 325 CE, represents a synthesis of solar and lunar cycles. The result is a movable feast that aligns cosmic events with theological significance.

Scholars of calendrical studies argue that this calculation reflects an early Christian attempt to universalize time across diverse regions. By anchoring Easter to both celestial phenomena and doctrinal necessity, the Church established a rhythm that symbolized cosmic redemption. The resurrection of Christ is thus not only a historical claim but also a cosmological event embedded in time itself.

However, this system has historically generated disputes, particularly between Eastern and Western Christian traditions, highlighting the political dimension of temporal authority.

3. The Islamic Calendar: Lunar Precision and Theological Simplicity

Islam operates on a purely lunar calendar consisting of twelve months totaling approximately 354 days. Unlike the Christian system, it does not reconcile with the solar year, resulting in the rotation of Islamic holy periods—such as Ramadan—through all seasons.

This structure reflects a theological orientation toward submission (Islam) rather than cosmic symbolism. Religious observance is tied to the physical sighting of the moon, emphasizing human participation in divine command rather than abstract astronomical calculation.

Crucially, Islam denies the crucifixion of Jesus, asserting instead that he was raised by God. This theological position removes the need for a resurrection-based holiday. Consequently, the absence of an Easter analogue is not a deficiency but a reflection of doctrinal coherence.

4. Theological Divergence: Jesus as the Axis of Temporal Meaning

At the center of the Easter debate lies the identity of Jesus Christ:

• In Christianity, Jesus is the Son of God, whose death and resurrection redeem humanity.
• In Islam, Jesus is a revered prophet, neither crucified nor divine.
• In Judaism, Jesus does not occupy a central theological role.

This divergence produces fundamentally different understandings of time:

• Christianity views time as redeemed through a singular salvific event.
• Islam understands time as a continuous framework for obedience to God.
• Judaism interprets time through covenantal memory and historical continuity.

Easter, therefore, represents more than a date—it encapsulates competing metaphysical claims about reality, history, and divine intervention.

5. Calendars as Instruments of Power and Identity

Calendars are not merely technical systems; they are instruments of authority. Control over timekeeping implies control over religious practice, social organization, and historical narrative.

Academic literature highlights how early disputes over Easter were as much about ecclesiastical power as theological correctness. Similarly, modern states utilize calendars to assert identity. Iran, for example, employs a highly accurate solar calendar for civil purposes while maintaining Islamic lunar observances for religious life. This dual system reflects a synthesis of scientific rationality and religious tradition.

Israel, on the other hand, uses the Hebrew lunisolar calendar, aligning religious festivals such as Passover with both lunar cycles and agricultural seasons. The historical connection between Passover and Easter underscores a shared origin that later diverged due to theological developments.

6. Iran and Israel: Temporal Systems in Geopolitical Context

The modern political tension between Iran and Israel can be partially understood through their differing temporal and theological frameworks:

• Iran represents an اسلامی epistemology that denies the crucifixion and emphasizes prophetic continuity.
• Israel embodies a covenantal tradition rooted in historical memory and national identity.

Easter, positioned between Passover and often near Ramadan, becomes a symbolic intersection of these traditions. While not directly influencing policy, these temporal structures shape cultural consciousness and ideological narratives.

In this sense, calendar systems contribute to what may be termed “civilizational time”—a shared understanding of history and destiny that informs political behavior.

7. Academic Discourse and Interfaith Implications

Contemporary scholarship has increasingly recognized the importance of calendars in interfaith dialogue. Theological debates surrounding Easter often intersect with discussions on historical Jesus studies, scriptural interpretation, and comparative religion.

Efforts to unify the date of Easter among Christian denominations reflect a broader desire for cohesion, yet similar alignment across Abrahamic faiths remains unlikely due to foundational doctrinal differences.

Nevertheless, the study of these systems offers valuable insights into how religions conceptualize time, authority, and truth.

8. Conclusion

Easter serves as a focal point for understanding the intersection of theology, astronomy, and geopolitics. Its calculation embodies a Christian vision of cosmic redemption, while its rejection within Islam highlights a fundamentally different theological framework. When viewed alongside Jewish temporal traditions and the modern political realities of Iran and Israel, Easter emerges as a symbolic fault line in civilizational thought.

Ultimately, this analysis demonstrates that calendars are not neutral constructs but expressions of deeply held beliefs about the nature of reality. By examining how different traditions structure time, we gain insight into their broader worldviews and the enduring complexities of interfaith and geopolitical relations.

References (Selected)

• Stern, S. Calendars in Antiquity: Empires, States, and Societies. Oxford University Press.
• Nasr, S. H. Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present.
• Wright, N. T. The Resurrection of the Son of God.
• Rahman, F. Major Themes of the Qur’an.
• World Council of Churches. Frequently Asked Questions About the Date of Easter.
• Museum of the Bible. Astronomy, Calendars, and the Date of Easter.
• Akrami, M. The Iranian Calendar: A Scientific Perspective.

Deep Time and Civilizational Identity: A Comparative Study of Iranian Continuity, Western Modernity, and San Ancestral Heritage

Author: Joshua Shipepe Hadula

Abstract

This paper examines the concept of “age” in human history by distinguishing between three overlapping but fundamentally different temporal frameworks: human ancestry, civilization, and modern statehood. Focusing on the Iranian plateau as one of the oldest continuous civilizations, Western Europe and the United States as relatively recent political formations, and the San peoples of Southern Africa as among the oldest continuous human populations, the study argues that historical “seniority” depends on the category of analysis. By integrating anthropological, archaeological, and historical perspectives, the paper demonstrates that while Iran represents long-term civilizational continuity, the San embody deep human antiquity that predates all known civilizations. This comparative framework challenges conventional narratives of historical development and re-centers Africa within the global chronology of humanity.

1. Introduction

Discussions of historical age often conflate distinct concepts: the antiquity of human populations, the emergence of civilizations, and the formation of modern nation-states. These categories operate on vastly different temporal scales yet are frequently treated as interchangeable in popular discourse. This paper seeks to disentangle these frameworks by examining three representative cases: the long-standing civilization of Iran, the relatively recent development of Western political states, and the deep ancestral continuity of the San peoples in Southern Africa.

By doing so, the study aims to clarify how different forms of historical continuity—genetic, cultural, and institutional—produce distinct claims to antiquity and identity.

2. Conceptual Framework: Three Dimensions of Time

To avoid analytical confusion, this paper proposes a tripartite framework:

Each operates independently, and no single society dominates across all three dimensions.

3. Iran and the Continuity of Civilization

The Iranian plateau is widely recognized as one of the oldest centers of continuous civilization. Archaeological evidence indicates the presence of complex societies as early as the fourth millennium BCE, including the civilization of Elam. Over time, the region saw the rise of successive empires—the Medes, Achaemenids, Parthians, and Sasanians—followed by Islamic dynasties that preserved and transformed earlier traditions.

This continuity is not merely political but cultural and linguistic. The persistence of Persian identity, despite invasions and transformations, illustrates a unique form of civilizational resilience. Scholars of Near Eastern history often emphasize that Iran’s historical trajectory represents an unbroken thread of statecraft, intellectual production, and cultural memory spanning over five millennia.

Thus, Iran exemplifies civilizational time, where institutions and cultural systems evolve yet maintain identifiable continuity.

4. Western Europe and the United States: The Emergence of Modern Political Time

In contrast, the political structures of Western Europe and North America are comparatively recent. While Europe hosts the remnants of ancient civilizations such as Greece and Rome, modern nation-states largely emerged after the early modern period, particularly following the Peace of Westphalia in 1648.

The United States, established in 1776, represents an even more recent political entity. Its identity is not rooted in ancient continuity but in constitutional innovation and ideological principles such as democracy and individual rights.

This form of historical development reflects political time, characterized by rapid institutional formation, transformation, and reinvention. Unlike Iran, where continuity is emphasized, Western states often derive legitimacy from progress, reform, and modernity rather than antiquity.

5. The San Peoples: Deep Ancestral Continuity

The San peoples of Southern Africa occupy a fundamentally different position in human history. Genetic and archaeological evidence suggests that they are among the oldest continuous human populations, with lineage tracing back over 100,000 years. Their presence in regions such as present-day Namibia predates the emergence of agriculture, cities, and written language.

The San have maintained cultural practices, including hunter-gatherer subsistence strategies, oral traditions, and ecological knowledge systems, that reflect a deep connection to early human lifeways. This continuity represents ancestral time, extending far beyond the temporal scope of any known civilization.

Importantly, the San do not fit conventional definitions of “civilization,” yet their historical depth surpasses all state-based societies. This challenges hierarchical notions that equate complexity with antiquity or superiority.

6. Comparative Analysis: Overlapping Temporalities

A comparative view reveals that these three cases occupy different positions across the temporal spectrum:

• The San represent the origin and persistence of humanity itself.
• Iran represents the long-term development of organized civilization.
• Western states represent the recent emergence of modern political systems.

These are not competing claims but complementary dimensions of history. Each reflects a different aspect of human existence: biological survival, social organization, and institutional governance.

7. Reframing Global History

This analysis calls for a re-evaluation of dominant historical narratives that prioritize recent political power or technological advancement. By recognizing the deep antiquity of African populations such as the San, it becomes clear that Africa is not peripheral but central to the human story.

Similarly, acknowledging Iran’s long civilizational continuity highlights the importance of non-Western contributions to global history. Western modernity, while influential, represents only a brief phase within a much longer human timeline.

8. Conclusion

The concept of historical “age” is multifaceted and depends on the lens through which it is viewed. Iran stands as one of the oldest continuous civilizations, embodying millennia of cultural and political development. Western Europe and the United States, though powerful, are relatively recent constructions within the framework of political time. The San peoples, however, represent a deeper and more profound continuity—one that reaches back to the earliest chapters of human existence.

Understanding these distinctions allows for a more nuanced appreciation of global history, one that respects the diversity of human experience across different temporal scales. Rather than asking which society is “oldest,” it is more accurate to recognize that humanity itself unfolds across multiple, overlapping timelines.

References (Selected)

• Diamond, J. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies.
• Ehret, C. The Civilizations of Africa: A History to 1800.
• Nasr, S. H. Islamic Science: An Illustrated Study.
• Smith, A. D. The Ethnic Origins of Nations.
• Stringer, C. The Origin of Our Species.
• Trigger, B. G. Understanding Early Civilizations: A Comparative Study.

Here is a fully strengthened academic transcript with named scholars, journals, and properly structured references (APA-style influence), while maintaining your original intellectual voice and framework:

Deep Time and Civilizational Identity: Extending the Timeline

Empire, Memory, and Global Accountability in Comparative Perspective

Author: Joshua Shipepe Hadula

Abstract

This transcript extends the tripartite framework of ancestral, civilizational, and political time by situating the British Empire and the Transatlantic Slave Trade within global historical chronology. Drawing on leading historians, anthropologists, and legal scholars, the paper argues that modern institutions—including the United Nations—face structural and epistemological limitations in addressing historical injustices rooted in earlier temporal regimes. By integrating interdisciplinary scholarship, the study advances a reframing of accountability across overlapping timelines.

1. Introduction: Expanding the Temporal Lens

The differentiation between ancestral, civilizational, and political time provides a critical methodological tool for historical analysis. Scholars such as Fernand Braudel emphasize the importance of the longue durée, while Immanuel Wallerstein situates modern global structures within capitalist expansion.

This study builds on these traditions by examining how empire, slavery, and modern governance intersect across temporal scales.

2. The British Empire and the Consolidation of Political Time

The British Empire represents a defining moment in the expansion of political time into a global system. Historians such as Niall Ferguson and C. A. Bayly argue that the empire accelerated globalization through trade, governance, and communication networks.

At the same time, postcolonial scholars including Edward Said and Dipesh Chakrabarty critique the epistemological dominance imposed by imperial structures.

Thus, the empire must be understood as:

• A system of global integration
• A mechanism of economic extraction
• A reconfiguration of indigenous temporalities into imperial governance

3. The Transatlantic Slave Trade as Historical Disruption

The Transatlantic Slave Trade has been extensively documented by scholars such as Paul Gilroy in The Black Atlantic and Walter Rodney in How Europe Underdeveloped Africa.

This system:

• Displaced over 12 million Africans
• Disrupted kinship systems and oral histories
• Created diasporic identities under coercion

Anthropologist Sidney Mintz further links slavery to the rise of global capitalism, demonstrating how plantation economies shaped modern consumption patterns.

The slave trade thus represents a rupture in ancestral time, where continuity is replaced by fragmentation and forced adaptation.

4. Royalty, Empire, and Historical Inheritance

The evolution of institutions such as the British Royal Family must be situated within imperial history. While historians like David Cannadine highlight the symbolic and ceremonial nature of monarchy, others point to its embeddedness within imperial systems.

Economic historians, including Eric Williams, argue that wealth generated through slavery and colonial exploitation contributed to European institutional development.

However, contemporary scholarship emphasizes:

• The diffuse nature of imperial wealth accumulation
• The distinction between direct and indirect benefit
• The persistence of symbolic authority beyond empire

Thus, modern royalty represents not a direct continuation of slavery, but a historical inheritance shaped by imperial structures.

5. International Law and the Problem of Historical Justice

The United Nations has acknowledged slavery as a crime against humanity, yet formal accountability remains limited. Legal scholars such as Antony Anghie argue that international law itself emerged within imperial contexts, shaping its limitations.

Key challenges include:

5.1 Non-Retroactivity of Law

As outlined in international legal doctrine, laws cannot typically be applied to actions preceding their codification.

5.2 State Sovereignty

The modern international system prioritizes sovereign equality, limiting enforcement mechanisms.

5.3 Political Economy of Power

As noted by Makau Mutua, global governance structures often reflect historical power imbalances.

6. Journals and Scholarly Discourse

The issues explored in this transcript are widely debated in leading academic journals, including:

• Journal of African History
• Past & Present
• Third World Quarterly
• American Historical Review

These publications collectively emphasize the need to integrate African perspectives into global historiography and reassess dominant narratives of modernity.

7. Reframing Accountability Across Time

Scholars increasingly advocate for multidimensional approaches to justice, including:

• Reparations discourse (see Hilary Beckles)
• Memory studies (see Aleida Assmann)
• Decolonial theory (see Walter Mignolo)

This approach recognizes that historical injustice cannot be resolved solely through legal mechanisms but requires:

• Cultural acknowledgment
• Educational transformation
• Economic redress

8. Conclusion

The integration of the British Empire into the broader temporal framework reinforces a central conclusion: historical significance depends on the dimension of time under consideration.

• The empire dominates political time
• Slavery disrupts ancestral time
• Civilizations like Iran sustain civilizational time

Modern institutions, including the United Nations, operate within political time yet are tasked with addressing injustices rooted in deeper temporal layers.

This tension defines the contemporary challenge of global justice.

References (Selected, APA Style)

• Braudel, F. (1980). On History. University of Chicago Press.
• Gilroy, P. (1993). The Black Atlantic. Harvard University Press.
• Rodney, W. (1972). How Europe Underdeveloped Africa. Bogle-L’Ouverture.
• Williams, E. (1944). Capitalism and Slavery. University of North Carolina Press.
• Wallerstein, I. (1974). The Modern World-System. Academic Press.
• Anghie, A. (2005). Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge University Press.
• Beckles, H. (2013). Britain’s Black Debt. University of the West Indies Press.
• Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe. Princeton University Press.
• Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
• Mintz, S. (1985). Sweetness and Power. Penguin Books.

Here is your enhanced academic transcript with Namibia-specific case studies integrated at a scholarly level, maintaining your framework and strengthening its regional authority:

Deep Time and Civilizational Identity: Extending the Timeline

Empire, Memory, and Global Accountability in Comparative Perspective

Author: Joshua Shipepe Hadula

Abstract

This study extends the tripartite framework of ancestral, civilizational, and political time by incorporating Southern African case studies, particularly Namibia. By examining the British Empire, the Transatlantic Slave Trade, and Namibia’s colonial and postcolonial experience, the paper demonstrates how global systems of power intersect with deep ancestral continuities. It further argues that institutions such as the United Nations face structural limitations in addressing layered historical injustices.

1. Introduction: Namibia in the Global Timeline

Namibia offers a critical lens through which to examine overlapping temporalities. While often positioned within modern political narratives, its history reflects:

• Ancestral continuity (San and early populations)
• Colonial disruption (German and South African rule)
• Modern state formation (post-1990 independence)

This makes Namibia a microcosm of global history, where deep time and political time collide.

2. Ancestral Time: The San and Deep Human History

The San people represent one of the oldest continuous human populations on Earth, with genetic lineages tracing back over 100,000 years.

In Namibia:

• Rock art sites such as Twyfelfontein reflect long-standing symbolic and cultural expression
• Oral traditions preserve ecological knowledge systems
• Hunter-gatherer practices illustrate continuity with early human lifeways

Anthropologists such as Richard B. Lee emphasize that San societies challenge assumptions that complexity only emerges through agriculture or state formation.

Namibia, therefore, anchors ancestral time at a global scale.

3. Colonial Disruption: German South West Africa

Namibia’s entry into global political time occurred violently under German colonization of Namibia, when it became German South West Africa.

This period culminated in the Herero and Namaqua Genocide, widely recognized as one of the first genocides of the 20th century.

Key features include:

• Systematic extermination policies
• Forced displacement into desert regions
• Concentration camps such as Shark Island Concentration Camp

Scholars like Jürgen Zimmerer and Benjamin Madley argue that this genocide prefigured later European atrocities, including those in World War II.

This moment represents a violent imposition of political time onto ancestral populations.

4. South African Rule and Apartheid Extension

Following Germany’s defeat in World War I, Namibia came under South African administration, extending the system of Apartheid into the territory.

Under this regime:

• Land dispossession intensified
• Racial classification systems were institutionalized
• Indigenous populations were confined to homelands

The struggle for independence was led by movements such as SWAPO, culminating in independence in 1990.

Namibia’s modern statehood thus emerges from prolonged resistance within political time.

5. Namibia and the Question of Reparations

Namibia stands at the forefront of global debates on historical justice. The Namibian government has engaged Germany in negotiations over recognition and reparations for the Herero and Namaqua genocide.

Key developments include:

• Germany’s formal acknowledgment of genocide (2021)
• Financial commitments framed as “development aid” rather than legal reparations
• Ongoing criticism from affected communities regarding representation and adequacy

Scholars such as Henning Melber highlight the tension between symbolic recognition and material justice.

This case illustrates the broader limitations faced by the United Nations and international law in addressing colonial-era crimes.

6. Walvis Bay, Trade, and Global Systems

The strategic port of Walvis Bay connects Namibia to global trade networks historically shaped by empire.

• Initially controlled by Britain, then South Africa
• Reintegrated into Namibia in 1994
• Serves as a gateway for regional and international commerce

This reflects how colonial infrastructure continues to shape modern economic geography, linking Namibia to global systems rooted in imperial expansion.

7. Comparative Insight: Namibia in the Global Framework

When placed alongside Iran and Western states:

• The San of Namibia represent ancestral time
• Colonial Namibia reflects imposed political time
• Independent Namibia embodies emerging statehood within modern systems

Unlike Iran’s long civilizational continuity, Namibia’s historical trajectory is marked by interruption, resistance, and reconstruction.

8. Reframing Global History through Namibia

Namibia challenges dominant narratives by demonstrating that:

• Africa is central to human origins and continuity
• Colonialism represents a disruption, not a beginning
• Modern states are recent overlays on ancient landscapes

This reinforces calls by scholars such as Achille Mbembe to rethink history beyond Eurocentric timelines.

9. Conclusion

Namibia’s history embodies all three dimensions of time:

• Deep ancestral continuity through the San
• Violent colonial disruption under German and South African rule
• Modern political reconstruction after independence

Its case underscores a central argument of this study: historical justice cannot be understood without recognizing the depth and complexity of overlapping temporalities.

The challenge for global institutions, including the United Nations, is not only legal but moral—how to reconcile modern governance with ancient and interrupted human histories.

References (Expanded, APA Style)

• Braudel, F. (1980). On History. University of Chicago Press.
• Melber, H. (2019). Understanding Namibia. Hurst Publishers.
• Zimmerer, J. (2011). Genocide in German South-West Africa. Merlin Press.
• Madley, B. (2016). An American Genocide. Yale University Press.
• Mbembe, A. (2001). On the Postcolony. University of California Press.
• Rodney, W. (1972). How Europe Underdeveloped Africa. Bogle-L’Ouverture.
• Beckles, H. (2013). Britain’s Black Debt. University of the West Indies Press.
• Lee, R. B. (1979). The !Kung San. Cambridge University Press.

A great 🧵 by #AdamJohnson of the Citations Needed pod about #WesternMedia's stilted blame-the-victim treatment of the US-Israeli #warOnIran, taking as example the downed US fighter jet.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/2040277570457932030.html
#Iran #IranWar #IranWarCoverage #media #MSM #mediaCriticism

Why Western Media Only Platforms Pro-Israel Iranians

https://video.mondoweiss.net/w/bLf2FZK18dC93k3jCrGhGg

New York Times headline on Israel’s announced control of southern Lebanon gets hit with a Community Note: 'That’s called an invasion.'

#FreeLebanon #Lebanon #illegaloccupation #westernmedia #warcrimes

#LARB Radio Hour | "Journalist and 'Equator' co-founder Jonathan Shainin joins the podcast to talk about war in #Iran, #Lebanon, and how conflict is covered by the #press"

https://lareviewofbooks.org/av/shainin-iran-war-podcast-media-interview-equator/
#warOnIran #warOnLebanon #media #WesternMedia #USmedia #warReporting #AmericanMedia #MiddleEast #MiddleEastCoverage #mediaCriticism #mediaBias

"No front-page stories in NYT, WSJ, WaPo. No mention on NBC and CBS Sunday Shows. No stand alone segments on Evening News shows. A death count on par with the OKC bombing is relegated to the back page."

https://www.columnblog.com/p/corporate-media-buries-story-of-us
#Minab #MinabMassacre #Iran #IranWar #warOnIran #media #MSM #mediaCriticism #WesternMedia #régimeChangeWars

The Western Press Are Trying To Spin Epstein As A RUSSIAN Agent

by Caitlin Johnstone
Caitlin's Newsletter
February 3, 2026

https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/the-western-press-are-trying-to-spin

“The global Zionist organ trafficking conspiracy”

by Kit Klarenberg in Al Mayadeen English

@palestine
@Palestine @[email protected]
@BBC5Live
@BBCRadio4
@BBCNews

"’Israel’ sits at the center of a global organ-trafficking network, linking recent arrests, decades of scandals, and the Gaza genocide to a vast illicit trade shielded from accountability”

https://english.almayadeen.net/articles/analysis/the-global-zionist-organ-trafficking-conspiracy

#Press #Israel #Gaza #Genocide #Organ #Trafficking #Conspiracy #IDF #Harvesting #MSM #WesternMedia #Zionism #OrganTrade

Author #simkern is highlighting the rebrand of #genocide as #ceasefire and the complicity of #westernmedia : https://youtube.com/watch?v=ADvb_mKfxz4

I’m sure I’m not the only one who’s noticed a lack of coverage of the actions of the #settlercolonial #apartheid entity of late. Our media is happy now the murders have returned to a more “normal” level and are trying to make us go along with the status quo.

Fuck that noise.

#fuckisraelfreepalestine
#deathdeathtotheidf