Are there some people on Mastodon discussing #GatesOpenResearch and its associated preprint server #VeriXiv? I have some questions
#scholcomm @academicchatter

Update: FTR, in this case "associated" means that Gates-funded authors subject to the 2025 OA Policy *can* but don't *have* to use VeriXiv; they *have* to use a preprint server
HT @Lisalibrarian https://hcommons.social/@Lisalibrarian/113088754933659138

Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe (@[email protected])

@[email protected] Gates authors aren't mandated to use VeriXiv, they are managed to preprint. I wrote up an analysis of the Gates "Policy Refresh" when it came out ... https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2024/04/15/gates-2025-open-access-policy/

hcommons.social

Another sign that gold open access was a mistake, and that diamond open access is the future

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is one of the most influential funding bodies in the world. According to one ranking, it is the second largest charitable foundation, and as of 31 December 2023 had an endowment of around $75.2 billion. That makes a shift in its publishing policy hugely important.

An article in Chemical & Engineering […]

#apcs #coalitionS #diamondOa #funding #gatesFoundation #goldOa #peerReview #planS #preprints #publishers #unesco #verixiv

https://walledculture.org/another-sign-that-gold-open-access-was-a-mistake-and-that-diamond-open-access-is-the-future/

Pour aider les chercheurs à se conformer à sa nouvelle politique #OpenAccess, la #GatesFoundation va lancer une nouvelle plateforme de #Préprints « vérifiés », #VeriXiv, qui conduira une série de vérifications rigoureuses avant publication du préprint.

➡️ https://www.f1000.com/verixiv/

VeriXiv: Gates Foundation Launches a Verified Preprint Platform

Explore VeriXiv, the Gates Foundation's new preprint platform, ensuring rapid research dissemination with integrity

F1000
Um auf #VeriXiv zurückzukommen, dem Preprint-Projekt der #GatesFoundation: gestern wurde im #ResearchTable darüber berichtet und wer wurde als Kritiker positiv herausgestellt? Kent Anderson, der grobkörnigste Lobbyist vom #STM-Publishing. Ich war ja selbst mal von ihm beschimpft worden, weil er unsere Gruppe, die "Replacing Academic Journals" schrieb, mit den Putschisten des 6. Januars verglich. So ein Geschwalle, das jede Veränderung wegbeißen soll, ziert also ein Entscheider-Briefing. Prost.