#Primes in quadratic progression 1/3
I’ve been looking at primes in what I’m calling quadratic progression but I don’t really know if that name is accurate or if there’s already a name for them. I’ve found some patterns that relate to #twinprimes and I’ve also made a video of this idea if that’s more your jam. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DiTRYaja4pY
I’ve created a sieve where the width of the table changes on each row. It’s right-justified so consecutive square numbers line up down the right hand side. Effectively each row has all the positive whole numbers smaller than the square number to the left. It’s triangular. I’ve created a triangle.
When you highlight all the prime numbers there are some obvious patterns for composites. All the even numbers form a grid. If you count the right column with the squares as column zero and count from the right, all the columns corresponding to square number are entirely composite except for the top number in some cases (like the right column in the sieve of Eratosthenes).
There’s no clear pattern to the primes. All the primes are on diagonals because every other diagonal is odd but there’s nothing un-interrupted where you’d confidently predict where the primes were.
Linear progressions
I see other amateur mathematicians trying to find primes by starting at say 7 and adding 6 repeatedly which results in a bunch of prime numbers - 13, 19, 25 is not a prime but 31, 37, 43 are. And while that linear approach is interesting, it’s not much more complicated than saying that primes don’t have 2 or 3 as factors. I think the prime progressions in this sort of visualisation are far more interesting. They follow the same sort of pattern but the number you add increases by 2 each step.



"