@anttipeltola I believe that it's more complex than that - "AI" is not always a scam: it's a massive re-arrangement of the dynamics of knowledge.

It's a sociology of knowledge thing, The paper below describes some of the dynamics that I mean. So called "AI" is ultra-normative.

Bailon-Moreno, Rafael, et al. "The pulsing structure of science: Ortega y Gasset, Saint Matthew, fractality and transfractality." Scientometrics 71.1 (2007): 3-24.
#science #sociologyofknowledge
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/204359721.pdf

@petersuber @[email protected] The legal anti-trust complaint against the six dominant science-publishers organized in the STM is well worth reading. It also explains how the research community got there. I hold that there would be more to say about the economy and the ecology of science as social systems. A lot has happened since Popper, who described, essentially, a linear system of merit, or Kuhn, who described simple social system dynamics.

#science #historyofscience #sociologyofknowledge

@homlett I believe that there is a dark corollary: when people are trained on the output of "AI" they will make sense of an ever smaller reality, limiting the potential worlds that the can think. This again feeds back on the network of people and artefacts, making it ever more sparse, institutional, rigid, and fragile. #ai #SociologyOfKnowledge #ANT
@wagesj45 @nothingfuture There is nothing morally wrong with that - unless one considers that the time of researchers a limited resource, or one feels that diluting the visibility of genuine research by inflation is a bad thing. This is already normalized in many research communities, and there is little to loose by accelerating it further. #science #replicationcrisis #sociologyofknowledge

@irenes @jonny All curated knowledge is associated to one power structure or another. Viable believe systems get copied, but rarely because of the things that don't serve a power structure.

Don't get me wrong: an individual isn't necessarily looking for power when exploring space in the dimensions of knowledge. Once it's been found, however, it needs a social structure to maintain and defend it. Unless, of course, one sees the dialectical nature of knowledge. #sociologyofknowledge

@drulum I understand the load of the stack very well - I try to alter between "dive deep" and "fly wide". Some stacks my just sit there until I find a different angle.

Pointers:
#SociologyOfKnowledge: Berger, The Social Construction of Reality (good starting point)

#Institutions: DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. "The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields." American sociological review (1983): 147-160.
https://www.enriquedans.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/The_Iron_Cage_Revisted_Institutional_Isomorphism_a.pdf

Since other Forthers have no fear of coming out here I can confess, too: I'm the maintainer of a rather well known small #forth for the #stm8 - for the 99.9999% who have no idea what any of that means: that's 1980s computer technology in a modern chip for a few cents (i.e, the chip is the computer). It's also a practical experiment in #sociologyofknowledge https://github.com/TG9541/stm8ef
GitHub - TG9541/stm8ef: STM8 eForth - a user friendly Forth for simple µCs with docs

STM8 eForth - a user friendly Forth for simple µCs with docs - TG9541/stm8ef

GitHub

To help make connections: name 5-7 things that interest you but aren't in your profile, as tags so they are searchable. Then boost this post and repeat its instructions so others know to do the same.

#sci-fi
#stainedglass
#philosophy
#sociologyofknowledge
#ttrpg
#snacks

@fruchtblase I don't have a degree in #sts, but spent a couple semesters hanging out with an STS group and it really clarified my thinking as a scientist, and am also interested in locating STS, #sciencestudies, and #sociologyofknowledge people.