Did I write about me getting my Gemini protocol capsule online again after a 20 months hiatus? No? Well, here it is, with mostly Gemini content:
Did I write about me getting my Gemini protocol capsule online again after a 20 months hiatus? No? Well, here it is, with mostly Gemini content:
`ls -l apps/misfin/store/identities/*.pem | wc -l`
46
That's how many #misfin #gembox are currently registered at #WPN
Perhaps one way a small-net browser client could enable people writing HTML to create nicer looking documents (without all the complexities of CSS) is —
By supporting the following attributes on the HTML <body> element:
<body
bgcolor="#141413"
text="#FAF9F5"
link="#FFFFFF"
vlink="#DDDDDD"
alink="#FF0000"
background="stars.png"
bgproperties="fixed"
>
Perhaps a "modernized" small-net / small-web version of XUL that incorporated lessons from spreadsheets —
Would let you "draw" the UI using the box-drawing characters, like from the DOS and Terminal eras.
And then, a small-net /small-web browser / app-runner could render these natively as mobile-phone UIs and desktop-computer UIs.
#GeminiProtocol #MercuryProtocol #SmallNet #SmallWeb #SmolNet #SmolWeb
Perhaps a "modernized" small-net / small-web version of XUL that incorporated lessons from spreadsheets —
• would provide a grid-first layout (while still allowing for other layouts)
• would support formulas/code in the same place data can go
• would support ways to allow the user to "draw" the UI
#GeminiProtocol #MercuryProtocol #SmallNet #SmallWeb #SmolNet #SmolWeb
What else could a "modernized" small-net / small-web app format learn from?
A LOT of non-programmers create applications using spreadsheets.
What could we learn from them?
#GeminiProtocol #MercuryProtocol #SmallNet #SmallWeb #SmolNet #SmolWeb
https://mastodon.social/@reiver/116458367287618358
Perhaps a "modernized" small-net / small-web version of XUL —
• would focus on intent
• would be declarative
• would have a simplified syntax (relative to XUL)
• would have high-level UI primitives
• would have reactive data bindings
• would aim for portability
• would be sandboxed by default
• would be adaptive by design
#GeminiProtocol #MercuryProtocol #SmallNet #SmallWeb #SmolNet #SmolWeb
Perhaps a "modernized" small-net / small-web version of XUL —
• would focus on intent
• would be declarative
• would have a simplified syntax (relative to XUL)
• would have high-level UI primitives
• would have reactive data bindings
• would aim for portability
• would be sandboxed by default
• would be adaptive by design
https://mastodon.social/@reiver/116458395826470481
#GeminiProtocol #MercuryProtocol #SmallNet #SmallWeb #SmolNet #SmolWeb
We've had different application formats over the decades. There may be things we could learn from them.
For example, decades ago there was XUL.
(XUL used to power Boxee, ChatZilla, Firefox, Komodo, Miro, Netscape, Songbird, Thunderbird, etc)
If we were to create a "modernized" small-net / small-web version of XUL, how might that look like?
#GeminiProtocol #MercuryProtocol #SmallNet #SmallWeb #SmolNet #SmolWeb
If the document formats of the small-net / small-web communities (currently) are GemText, Markdown, a sub-set of HTML, and text, then —
What might a small-net / small-web app format look like?
https://mastodon.social/@reiver/116458112950739729
#GeminiProtocol #MercuryProtocol #SmallNet #SmallWeb #SmolNet #SmolWeb