I love Senator Sheldon Whitehouse. #TheLastWord #SCOTUSleak

Gail Curley, the #SCOTUS marshal, said on Friday that she spoke with the justices as part of her investigation into the #Dobbs #SCOTUSleak but that the justices – unlike court employees – were not asked to swear under penalty of perjury that they were not responsible for the leak. 🤔 #SCOTUSisCorrupt #SCOTUSillegitimate #ImpeachThomasAlitoRoberts

https://www.scotusblog.com/2023/01/justices-were-not-asked-to-swear-under-penalty-of-perjury-that-they-didnt-leak-dobbs/

Justices were not asked to swear under penalty of perjury that they didn’t leak Dobbs - SCOTUSblog

Gail Curley, the Supreme Court’s marshal, said on Friday that she spoke with the justices as part of her investigation into the Dobbs leak but that the justices – unlike court employees – were not asked to swear under penalty of perjury that they were not responsible for the leak. In a brief, pre

SCOTUSblog

The Supreme Court’s internal investigation into who leaked a draft of the opinion overturning #RoeVsWade, the 1973 decision that had established a constitutional right to #abortion, included interviews w/all nine justices, the marshal of the court said in a statement on Friday.

#SCOTUS #SCOTUSstench #PartisanCourt #CourtReform #SCOTUSleak #Dobbs #Justice

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/20/us/politics/supreme-court-leak-justices.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Supreme Court Justices Were Interviewed in Investigation of Leaked Abortion Opinion

But the justices were not asked to sign sworn affidavits, unlike law clerks and other employees, the court’s marshal said.

The Marshall Report on the #SupremeCourtLeaks #scotusLeak makes clear that NONE of the actual SCOTUS judges were investigated. To me that means it is known that one of the judges did the leaking and a cover up is desired. If SCOTUS took MY suggestion on how to actually PRINT these decisions, we might already know who leaked it. Listen to my 3 min video on document tracking: https://youtu.be/Y1t_CwszAMI

Here is the Vanity Fair article on the leak investigation https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/01/supreme-court-dobbs-leak-investigation-inconclusive

#ClassifiedDocuments Should Be Printed On Trackable Paper

YouTube

The Supreme Court has issued its report on the leak of the Dobbs decision. The Court could not identify a leaker based on a thorough investigation.

I would not at all be surprised if one of the Justices was the leaker, and I have my suspicions as to which one...

https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/press/Dobbs_Public_Report_January_19_2023.pdf

#SCOTUS #Dobbs #SCOTUSLeak #Law

Because they *can’t* find who leaked the Dobbs decision—we know it’s either Alito or Thomas. #scotus #dobbs #scotusleak #robertscourt

Because—had it been any other justice, especially, a non-ideologue federalist society Justice — that’d be found, announced & punished.

#2014 #SCOTUS Ruling Was Leaked to Advocates, Former #AntiAbortion Leader Claims - The Daily Beast #SCOTUSLeak

https://apple.news/ArZaTg7gaTYSTLED5nnoyiA
2014 SCOTUS Ruling Was Leaked to Advocates, Former Anti-Abortion Leader Claims — The Daily Beast

Rev. Rob Schenck said he learned of the ruling in the 2014 Burwell v. Hobby Lobby case before it became public.

The Supreme Leaks

Is the right still crying about the Dobbs leak?

Justices have been hob-nobbing with far right activists, including a group that bought property and set up shop right across the street from the Supreme Court.

Gotta wonder what role Ginni Thomas plays in this…

Watch: https://youtu.be/TuS_EqzmjRc

#SCOTUS #ScotusLeak #AbortionRights

Alleged Leak Of SCOTUS Decision ‘Extremely Harmful To American Politics’

YouTube

Justice Alito denies disclosing 2014 Hobby Lobby opinion in advance. #SCOTUSleak

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/11/19/alito-hobby-lobby-supreme-court-nyt/

Justice Alito denies disclosing 2014 Hobby Lobby opinion in advance

Allegation against Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. comes after leak of draft Dobbs abortion opinion, amid growing public questions about the high court's legitimacy.

The Washington Post