Opinion | The Pressing Case for Supreme Court Reform

In a representative democracy, no one should hold so much power for so long.

The New York Times

Just finished Elie Mystal's podcast Contempt of Court. Really interesting and thought-provoking. Highly recommend it, if you're looking for something to listen to.
https://www.thenation.com/content/contempt-of-court/

#podcast #recommended #supremecourt #courtreform #judicialethics #courtpacking #SCOTUS

Contempt of Court Archives

Contempt of Court news and analysis from The Nation.

The Nation

I have always felt that nine justices is really too few for the Supreme Court and that we ought to expand it to at least thirteen (or more). I don’t see much downside to a larger court.

And with strategic retirements now making #scotus more partisan, we probably need to do something about term limits.

The hard part is reforming the confirmation process. How do you assure that each president gets to select a set number of judges, but no more or less?

#courtreform

https://ballsandstrikes.substack.com/p/the-conventional-wisdom-on-supreme

The Conventional Wisdom On Supreme Court Reform Is More Wrong Than Ever

For Democrats, running against a historically unpopular Supreme Court is basically a free space on the campaign trail bingo card.

Balls & Strikes
ICYMI: Illinois supreme court sets lenient AI disclosure requirements for legal system: Illinois supreme court announced a new policy allowing AI use in courts without mandatory disclosure, raising concerns over transparency. https://ppc.land/illinois-supreme-court-sets-lenient-ai-disclosure-requirements-for-legal-system/ #IllinoisSupremeCourt #AIDisclosure #LegalTech #TransparencyInAI #CourtReform
Illinois supreme court sets lenient AI disclosure requirements for legal system

Illinois supreme court announced a new policy allowing AI use in courts without mandatory disclosure, raising concerns over transparency.

PPC Land

@thegansen

Support Ron Wyden’s court reform bill.

#scotus #courtreform #ruleoflaw #fightcorruption

Each justice would be required to publicly release their opinions & disclose how they voted on issues considered on an emergency basis, sometimes referred to as the #ShadowDocket. Such decisions, which have become more common & increasingly controversial in recent years, don’t identify how each justice voted.

#law #SCOTUS #ethics #JudicialEthics #Judiciary #JudicialReform #CourtReform #SCOTUSreform #PartisanCourt #ActivistCourt #USpol

It would require the #IRS to initiate an #audit of the justices’ tax returns each year, release the results & make the tax filings public. Nominees to the court would have to disclose 3 yrs of tax returns.

Another measure would allow a two-thirds vote of the court to force a fellow justice to #recuse from a case.

#law #SCOTUS #ethics #JudicialEthics #Judiciary #JudicialReform #CourtReform #SCOTUSreform #PartisanCourt #ActivistCourt #USpol

During the rollout, each president would approve justices in the first & third year of their terms.

The bill would also require a ruling by ⅔ of the high court & the circuit courts of appeals, rather than a simple majority, to overturn a #law passed by #Congress. #Wyden said the current court has been too quick to discard #precedent & curtail #rights by narrow majorities.

#SCOTUS #ethics #JudicialEthics #Judiciary #JudicialReform #CourtReform #SCOTUSreform #PartisanCourt #ActivistCourt #USpol

‼️🚨🤬🤬🤬🚨‼️

Judge Pauses #Biden Admin Program That Aids #Undocumented #Spouses

Ruling in favor of 16 #Republican-led states that sued the admin, a federal judge put the program on hold while the court considers the merits of the case.

#immigration #law #FamilySeparation #CourtReform #VoteBlue #HarrisWalz2024 #justice
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/26/us/undocumented-spouses-biden-administration.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb

Judge Pauses Biden Administration Program That Aids Undocumented Spouses

Ruling in favor of 16 Republican-led states that sued the administration, a federal judge put the program on hold while the court considers the merits of the case.

The New York Times