This is fascist thinking, I believe: identify a group of people and authorize or at least self-excuse all violence toward them, regardless of their individual actions. This is the reasoning behind antisemitism, islamophobia, anti-trans ideology, etc.
"But this is different! Fascists are actually hurting people!"
Yes, that is exactly what fascists believe.
#process is everything, or close enough that the difference usually doesn't matter.
Edit: I was being a little slappy with "fascist thinking" above: thinking this about fascists is not necessarily fascism, I don't think (though it would take many words to explain and I'm not sure I'm right). It's a pretty big problem, however, especially if people who think like this are ever in charge of anything big. This kind of thinking, I believe, can lead to systems that cause as much suffering as fascism (see Soviet Union) and sometimes to actual fascism, as well.
/fin
Another Nietzsche quote: "Mistrust all in whom the urge to punish is powerful."
Even if they have "antifa" in their profile.
It is tiring and a little alarming to see what appear to be calls for violence as the "obvious" response to problems that have nonviolent solutions with a higher likelihood of success, and toward people because they've been identified as fascists, rather than because of any harm they have caused.
#fascism #radicalism #resistance #criticalthinking
4/
If the fascist actions can be stopped without violence, then do that. Always. Of course this means looking down the road a bit, but stay away from "use violence to prevent all fascism going forward" because that's how genocides, pogroms, and "how did my loving collectivist government turn into repressive totalitarian regime?" happen.
Hate the game, not the player, or something like that. Take care you don't become a monster when you're fighting monsters.
#fascism #radicalism #resistance #nietzsche
3/
So maybe it boils down to hormones: "Will I reproduce?"
Radicalism, extremism, fundamentalism: International study finds numerous commonalities—and certain differences
https://phys.org/news/2026-01-radicalism-extremism-fundamentalism-international-numerous.html
> From a social sciences perspective, people with radical, extremist, or fundamentalist attitudes are similar in some respects: In most cases, they are younger and less educated men who feel that they are not taken seriously enough.

From a social sciences perspective, people with radical, extremist, or fundamentalist attitudes are similar in some respects: In most cases, they are younger and less educated men who feel that they are not taken seriously enough. This is one of the key findings of a research team led by professor Marc Helbling, sociologist at the University of Mannheim focusing on Migration and Integration and Executive Board member of the Mannheim Center for European Social Research (MZES).
Fighting radicalizes people - and sometimes for the better
#Newsmax is Fox News on steroids. #OAN is Newsmax on cocaine. Whatever screwy right-wing network springs up, it will probably be all the bad things about the three others, as well as packed with psychedelic-driven edgelords who spout incessant drivel and blarney primarily young adults. It's time for the #GOP to have an introspection and ask this: What exactly are we conserving these days?
#conservatism #extremism #farright #FoxNews #radicalism #radicalRight #RepublicanParty #rightwing
Perhaps the most bizarre thing to happen this whole year (for me, anyway) is the Trump–Mamdani Oval Office meeting last month, and how the two inimical men suddenly grew chummy. I am speechless. *cue Sonnenaufgang, Also Sprach Zarathustra*
https://reason.com/2025/12/05/a-trump-mamdani-alliance-is-americas-horseshoe-theory-nightmare/
#year2025 #2025InReview #authoritarianism #DonaldTrump #horseshoeTheory #politics #populism #radicalism #ZohranMamdani