X/Twitter exposing user location in such a safety-positive way makes a modest dent in the EU’s approach to protecting personally-identifiable information https://alecmuffett.com/article/128340 #OnlineSafety #gdpr #prvacy #xitter

X/Twitter exposing user locati...
X/Twitter exposing user location in such a safety-positive way makes a modest dent in the EU’s approach to protecting personally-identifiable information

I’m confident a few privacy activists across Europe are seeking GDPR (etc) arguments to critique the mechanisms behind the location-based exposure of “Foreign, Fake MAGA Agents”; …

Dropsafe
X/Twitter exposing user location in such a safety-positive way makes a modest dent in the EU’s approach to protecting personally-identifiable information
https://alecmuffett.com/article/128340
#OnlineSafety #gdpr #prvacy #xitter
X/Twitter exposing user location in such a safety-positive way makes a modest dent in the EU’s approach to protecting personally-identifiable information

I’m confident a few privacy activists across Europe are seeking GDPR (etc) arguments to critique the mechanisms behind the location-based exposure of “Foreign, Fake MAGA Agents”; …

Dropsafe

X/Twitter exposing user location in such a safety-positive way makes a modest dent in the EU’s approach to protecting personally-identifiable information

I’m confident a few privacy activists across Europe are seeking GDPR (etc) arguments to critique the mechanisms behind the location-based exposure of “Foreign, Fake MAGA Agents”; I disagree, but I think there will be ripples of positive & negative consequences until a new norm is established & understood. Of course I’m not the only one thinking this:

Another former employee, speaking on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to speak about their work at X by their current employer, said the company had decided against deploying the idea in the past for two reasons: concern about creating a visible target for bad actors to manipulate and fear that the label could backfire. If a bad actor successfully spoofed a U.S. location, the platform would effectively be incorrectly verifying it as a trusted American voice.

It’s pretty simple:

  • the fakes will adapt to look more credible
  • the readers will trust the adaptations
  • even greater transparency will be sought or demanded:
  • user-via-vpn, user-via-tor-over-vpn, exposure of source IP’s “reputation”, deanonymisation via reputation-mapping attacks, GDPR lawsuits, exposure of source IP, faked source IPs, …
  • lather, rinse, repeat forever

The only way to break this loop is not to play the game, but we’re not in that universe at the moment.

However: there are some worthwhile zingers in the comments, here:

Reddit:

Nikita Bier, X’s head of product development, said they’re working to resolve the use of VPNs to alter account location. How?

https://www.reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/1p4pkji/nikita_bier_xs_head_of_product_development_said/

#gdpr #onlineSafety #prvacy #xitter

X feature reveals locations of some users. It could backfire.

Advocates for transparency cheered when X, the app owned by tech billionaire Elon Musk, rolled out a new feature that disclosed the country locations of users.

NBC News

‚Das Bundesinnenministerium will frühere Vornamen und Geschlechtseinträge zeitlich unbegrenzt im Melderegister speichern. Fachverbände schlagen Alarm: Für Menschen, die ihre Daten ändern ließen, steige damit das Risiko, auch in Zukunft diskriminiert zu werden. Sie sehen das Ziel des Selbstbestimmungsgesetzes in Gefahr.‘

Wie eine neue Verordnung zur Bedrohung für Betroffene wird #Selbstbestimmungsgesetz

https://netzpolitik.org/2025/selbstbestimmungsgesetz-wie-eine-neue-verordnung-zur-bedrohung-fuer-betroffene-wird/

#Datenschutz #Repression #Prvacy #LGBTQIA #LGBTQ #TransRightsAreHumanRights #Netzpolitik

Selbstbestimmungsgesetz: Wie eine neue Verordnung zur Bedrohung für Betroffene wird

Das Bundesinnenministerium will frühere Vornamen und Geschlechtseinträge zeitlich unbegrenzt im Melderegister speichern. Fachverbände schlagen Alarm: Für Menschen, die ihre Daten ändern ließen, steige damit das Risiko, auch in Zukunft diskriminiert zu werden. Sie sehen das Ziel des Selbstbestimmungsgesetzes in Gefahr.

netzpolitik.org
The massive surveillance dragnet (and #prvacy nightmare) enabled by Flock cameras just keeps getting creepier according to reporting from @404mediaco: https://www.404media.co/home-depot-and-lowes-share-data-from-hundreds-of-ai-cameras-with-cops/
Home Depot and Lowe's Share Data From Hundreds of AI Cameras With Cops

Home improvement stores are finding ways to share data from their Flock license plate reader cameras with law enforcement, according to public records.

404 Media

https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/campaigns/no-data-for-surveillance-tech/

Stop Surveillance Tech: Protect Your Data

A new investigation reveals that ShadowDragon, a U.S. government contractor, is secretly collecting data from over 200 popular websites like Reddit, Etsy, Tinder, and Duolingo. This data is used to create detailed digital profiles, often without the platforms’ consent. Mozilla is launching a campaign urging these sites to block ShadowDragon’s surveillance tools and strengthen privacy protections.

#Prvacy #Security

Sometimes the title of an article doesn't really get across the truly horrifying reality ...
"Why Your Wi-Fi Router Doubles As an Apple AirTag" should really be "Why the F is Apple giving away so much geolocation data all willy nilly?" but either way, give it a read:
https://mobile.slashdot.org/story/24/05/22/2043235/why-your-wi-fi-router-doubles-as-an-apple-airtag
#wifi #geolocation #gps #iPhone #prvacy
Why Your Wi-Fi Router Doubles As an Apple AirTag - Slashdot

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Krebs On Security: Apple and the satellite-based broadband service Starlink each recently took steps to address new research into the potential security and privacy implications of how their services geo-locate devices. Researchers from the University of Mary...

What is Fisa, and what does it mean for no-warrant spying?

After a week of debate, Congress on Friday reauthorized section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act

The Guardian