X/Twitter exposing user location in such a safety-positive way makes a modest dent in the EU’s approach to protecting personally-identifiable information
I’m confident a few privacy activists across Europe are seeking GDPR (etc) arguments to critique the mechanisms behind the location-based exposure of “Foreign, Fake MAGA Agents”; I disagree, but I think there will be ripples of positive & negative consequences until a new norm is established & understood. Of course I’m not the only one thinking this:
Another former employee, speaking on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to speak about their work at X by their current employer, said the company had decided against deploying the idea in the past for two reasons: concern about creating a visible target for bad actors to manipulate and fear that the label could backfire. If a bad actor successfully spoofed a U.S. location, the platform would effectively be incorrectly verifying it as a trusted American voice.
It’s pretty simple:
- the fakes will adapt to look more credible
- the readers will trust the adaptations
- even greater transparency will be sought or demanded:
- user-via-vpn, user-via-tor-over-vpn, exposure of source IP’s “reputation”, deanonymisation via reputation-mapping attacks, GDPR lawsuits, exposure of source IP, faked source IPs, …
- lather, rinse, repeat forever
The only way to break this loop is not to play the game, but we’re not in that universe at the moment.
However: there are some worthwhile zingers in the comments, here:
Reddit:
Nikita Bier, X’s head of product development, said they’re working to resolve the use of VPNs to alter account location. How?
https://www.reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/1p4pkji/nikita_bier_xs_head_of_product_development_said/
#gdpr #onlineSafety #prvacy #xitter