Mee-thos? Meye-thos? Mi-thos?
A month in, I still couldn't tell you.
The loudest opinions on AI vulnerability research almost never come from the people actually using it or contributing to making the world more secure.
Since Anthropic shipped Mythos and OpenAI Codex Cyber, my feed has been wall-to-wall thought leadership. Sage wisdom. Whitepapers. Panels. Frameworks for "AI-augmented vulnerability discovery." Panels about the frameworks. And one framework about panels
Meanwhile, the engineers I know, the ones helping secure the internet, have gone quiet. There's usually a reason for that.
The actual work is unglamorous. You read code. You read more code. You look upstream at the open source the whole world depends on. You find things. You report them carefully. You wait. And hopefully you've made the world a little more secure.
That's what our team at LinkedIn has been doing, inside our own stack and across the dependencies we all share. I'll share more when I can.
One thing I won't wait to say:
To the open source maintainers who've fielded our reports, triaged with patience, and shipped fixes through what has genuinely been an unprecedented stretch, thank you. I owe you many coffees/beers/waters. Much love.
Wu-Tang said it in '93: protect ya neck. You've been doing it for the rest of us ever since. No royalties, no panels, no merch.
Just the work.
Back to research and helping fix upstream.
#opensourcesoftware #cybersecurity