https://endowment.dev/ #OpenSourceFunding #SustainableProjects #TechNews #CommunitySupport #HackerNews #ngated
I remember there was a page on #Nlnet website about organizations which would fund open source research and/or development. But I can't find it. Anyone?
Boosts appreciated.
ping @nlnet
#opensource #foss #opensourcefunding #funding #ngi
Neuer Artikel im Blog:
TYPO3-Ideen für Q2/2025: Wähle mit und gestalte die Zukunft
https://wwagner.net/blog/a/typo3-ideen-fuer-q2-2025-waehle-mit-und-gestalte-die-zukunft
Just checked how many connected NR instances there are combined for my Alexa and Google Home nodes.
If I can convince 1% of them to chip in $1 a month then the costs are covered.
Published a first draft of Collective Funds Guidelines: https://github.com/collective-funds/guidelines
First user will be Mocha and its inspired by prior art of awesome fellow @openjsf projects @eslint and WebdriverIO 🙏
Thanks to (in no special order) @JoshuaKGoldberg, @mcollina, @west, @ulisesgascon, @uzlopak, @bcomnes for review, feedback and suggestions that helped shape this 🙏
"Wait. You mean we can exploit the workers we pay AND the ones we don't pay? Oh hell yeah!"
So I guess my question is (sorry this is so rambly, nuance is hard!!)… how would you as an ethical open source project with diverse interests and a community of users with strong feelings around “AI” approach this?
I almost feel like we need to distinguish the current generative AI hype from ML-powered features when it comes to public communication—but *also* lean into “AI” when looking at funding. And that distinction is… hard.
Like it or not—and I absolutely *hate* it—“AI” is where the hype is now. I don’t want to play into it. I think “generative AI” is extraordinarily overblown, problematic, and burning an immeasurable amount of resources. So let’s not do _that_.
But if you could secure a grant to “integrate helpful, privacy-respecting AI features” into GNOME… wouldn’t you? To be clear, this would include the features I mentioned earlier—not generative AI.