From #PrimaryCurves to #SecondaryCurves for classic #IonicScroll

There's a lot to unpack in this diagram. For orientation, first note the 5 rectangles labeled M, N, P, Q, and R that we saw in https://pixelfed.social/p/Splines/792966507797633558, shown here in green.

The 6 blue curves are the primary curves we extracted from #imageScans in https://pixelfed.social/p/Splines/793169876757012827 and https://pixelfed.social/p/Splines/793215298082967733. The front ends of these blue primary curves are marked by points labeled F1 through F6, all of which make contact with the green rectangles of the scroll #scaffolding. The rear ends of the primary curves would be marked similarly by points R1 through R6, but they are not shown here to reduce clutter.

The orange points T1 through T5 mark where the large orange spiral is tangential to rectangles M and N. Point T6 marks the maxima for the second arm of the spiral, with the horizontal tangent shown in magenta.

In https://pixelfed.social/p/Splines/790571135473463588, I said that one way to think about #curveExtraction is to shine an imaginary bright light on an object from behind in a dark room to reveal its silhouette.

It is obvious that the blue primary curves that we extracted from image scans have NO contact with the orange spiral at any point. If you imagine shining a light on an object to #project its outline on a screen behind it, then it should also be obvious that no part of the object will be in contact with the projected outline.

So, here we are faced with the opposite problem. Instead of extracting the outlines from the #scroll, we want to recreate the scroll from the outlines that we extracted from image scans. We know the scroll exists because we can "see" its outline. Yet, like a visually-impaired person, we must "feel" our way to the scroll using the blue outlines as our #walkingStick.

Next, I show how we can feel our way around this scene to recover the secondary curves to reconstruct the scroll surface.
Splines (@[email protected])

Classic #IonicScroll #Scaffolding Take the time to understand the measurements of this scaffolding plan in the broader context of the #IonicCapital measurements, as this is the bedrock on which the #scroll reconstruction rests. First, note that there are 5 rectangles labeled M, N, P, Q, and R, where M and N are coplanar with the large #volute at the front of the scroll. P and Q are congruent, with P exactly midway between the front and the back of the scroll, and Q exactly 3/4 of the way from front, or 1/4 from back. R is the smallest of them and lies at the back of the bell-shaped part of the scroll, but ahead of the ribbon bearing the 3-strand #braid. M completely encloses the volute, including #ArcZero, but much of Arc zero is discarded later. So, the part of the volute that really matters is enclosed by N, whose width is 112 units, height the same as M at 128 units, and the width of M itself is exactly µ or 144 units. So these measurements are in the ratio 7:8:9. The width of P and Q is 56 units, which is exactly half the width of N. Recall from the post on #IonicCapital #Tectonic Surfaces [https://pixelfed.social/p/Splines/792124787573855518] that the unadorned capital is also exactly 112 units, divided into two halves of 56 units each. R is concentric with P and Q and its width is exactly half of the width of P and Q, which are exactly half the width of N. Top of R is 32 units from top of N and 16 units from top of P and Q. Bottom of P and Q are 32 units from bottom of N and 16 units from bottom of R. Finally note the diagonal line from the origin to the #eye with a point in the middle. That middle point is the center of rectangle labeled N. It shows that the volute #eye, the center of N and the centers of concentric rectangles P, Q, and R would be collinear if these rectangles were coplanar. All of these constraints point to warrantable consistency and coherence of the scaffolding measurements, justifying their use in scroll reconstruction.

Pixelfed
This shows macro-level measurements for the #IonicPedestal.

The key to #effectiveModeling is to simplify a complex shape into elementary components. Sometimes, this involves mentally flattening and reducing 3D shapes to 2D shapes, extracting elementary curves from them, and then recreating the 3D shapes from the extracted 2D curves.

This is not always easy for organic shapes (which can still be approximated by Bézier curves). I extracted the #primaryCurves for the #IonicScroll surface in https://pixelfed.social/p/Splines/789956327130679640 after a lengthy trial-and-error process that involved #curveFitting images from #Vignola’s book, #RegolaArchitettura. I had to #reverseEngineer the details because the measurements have either been lost, or are locked away in some library. Web search yields no details on these measurements.

Fortunately, for geometrical shapes like pedestals, this is very easy. Because of its square footprint, mentally slicing it through the middle from top to bottom, it is easy to “see” the outline. Another way to think about #curveExtraction is to shine an imaginary bright light on an object from behind in a dark room to reveal its silhouette.

For the pedestal, even this silhouette or outline can be further reduced because the shape is symmetrical about the #columnAxis. With this realization, we only need to focus on one half of the outline, and methodically proceed from bottom to top, marking every kink and inflection point on the outline.

Fortunately, the other authoritative book, #Scarlata’s #PracticalArchitecture, I mentioned in my introductory post already documents #VignolaProportions in tabular form. So we can skip everything else and go directly to that.

Total height of #IonicPedestal is 864 units (108 parts, or 6*µ) of which the #PedestalBasement and #PedestalCap are each 72 units (9 parts, or µ/2) and the #Dado is 720 units (90 parts, or µ*5) tall.
Splines (@[email protected])

This sweeping shape is a timeless design that first appeared in the scrolls of the #IonicCapital as the most distinctive part of the #IonicOrder in classical Greco-Roman architecture more than 2500 years ago. Shown here with a zebra pattern on the wireframe of a CAD model to accentuate its features and attest to the smoothness of its 3-dimensional surface, the design has been refined many times since the original version over the last two millennia. The two most remarkable things about this design are that: — It can be recreated with modern CAD tools by drawing simple 2-dimensional straight lines and circular arcs exclusively. The end result is truly breathtaking and makes one wonder how architects visualized the result and put theory into practice. In the CAD model, the ultimate surface is a #NURBS surface that uses #BSplines extensively, but none of the B-splines or surfaces need to be created "by hand." One only has to draw straight lines and circular arcs with accurate measurements snapped to grids. — For a design that has survived the ages, it is lamentable how few authoritative sources that accurately describe fine details and exact reconstruction methodology remain accessible to the general public in the age of Internet. The most comprehensive is the 10-volume tome that Marcus #Vitruvius Pollio, a Roman architect and engineer, wrote for #JuliusCaesar and his successor Emperor #CaesarAugustus. [https://www.gutenberg.org/files/20239/20239-h/20239-h.htm] I frequently use two more authoritative sources: — "Regola delli cinque ordini d' architettura," or simply #RegolaArchitettura by Giacomo Barozzi da #Vignola [https://archive.org/details/gri_33125008229458/page/n3/mode/2up], and — "A Course in Theoretical and Practical Architecture," or simply #PracticalArchitecture by Francisco Salvatore #Scarlata (#Bordonaro), which documents #VignolaProportions in tabular form [https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015031201190&view=1up&seq=5]

Pixelfed