2/2 #automationparadox

Control of access to energy is necessary for them to achieve this outcome, but also would become a tool to control the individual(s) who might rebel.

Can we talk about the future that oligarchs actually want, vs the one they tell you they want?

And the mechanical elephant in the room: The #automationparadox.

The automation paradox goes like this:
"We are going to automate jobs with robotics and #AI. You won't need to work. We'll do something like Universal Basic Income (UBI), I guess. Or whatever."

That's not what the oligarchs actually 'want', it's the outcome of their actual want: To eliminate the cost of human labor and increase profit. But that ends in a paradox.

Who buys the goods and services if the fruits of human labor do not result in income?

My thesis is this: "You still do."

That works not by removing income completely, but by quantizing ALL income (except their own) so that we, the masses, are ALL equally poor. Not so poor that we cannot still buy a new Smart TV, a new smartphone, pay for media subscriptions for that new Smart TV. Captive and controlled consumers. Money, wealth, becomes less about the amount of currency* than about the level of control, power, and privilege. Control of access to energy is related topic.

Quantizing income takes the excess that people who are doing better than average, and people who are considered 'rich' but not yet powerful, etc. - taking that and leveling that playing field down to a mean. That above-the-line public wealth then goes to the oligarchs. This 'wealth' actually equates more to power than money, but that's a whole 'nother post.

The #oligarchy who poo-poos socialism wants to institute what I'm calling Capitalistic Communism; replacing the state with the Oligarchy. The people are, as in Soviet-style communism, equally depressed financially. No one, except the pets of the state (Oligarchs) is more affluent than anyone else. And most will still need to work in some form or another. But never with any ability to rise above the quantized floor of 'allowed income'. Or the ability to own _anything_.

The oligarchy will extract the remaining wealth from the middle, upper-middle, and upper class, leaving only The Masses on one end and The Oligarchs on the other.

And then we will well and truly be the consuming slaves they 'want'.

* It already is, Elon Musk doesn't 'make money', he accumulates financial control.

AI often demands constant human supervision, creating new workplace stresses and burnout rather than reducing them. Recognising this paradox is essential to designing AI that genuinely enhances working conditions.
Discover more at https://dev.to/rawveg/the-babysitter-club-42jd
#HumanInTheLoop #WorkplaceAI #AIandMentalHealth #AutomationParadox
The Babysitter Club

The promise was seductive: artificial intelligence would liberate workers from drudgery, freeing...

DEV Community

We are living this decade of #aiHype lamebrain experts every year with imminent #AIRadiologists standalone replacement of #HumanRadiologists pushed out all over the news...

Uncurious to learn other fields #IroniesOfAutomation research

https://erictopol.substack.com/p/when-doctors-with-ai-are-outperformed

Last paper closer:

» Moreover, #radiologists take significantly more time to make a decision when #AI information is provided «

https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2023-07/agarwal-et-al-diagnostic-ai.pdf

#AutomationParadox #LessonsLearned in #Aviation #HumanFactors applied training

1/2

When Doctors With A.I. Are Outperformed by A.I. Alone

Interpreting Some Surprising Results

Ground Truths

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/oct/11/crash-how-computers-are-setting-us-up-disaster

"The paradox of automation, then, has three strands to it. First, automatic systems accommodate incompetence by being easy to operate and by automatically correcting mistakes. Because of this, an inexpert operator can function for a long time before his lack of skill becomes apparent – his incompetence is a hidden weakness that can persist almost indefinitely. Second, even if operators are expert, automatic systems erode their skills by removing the need for practice. Third, automatic systems tend to fail either in unusual situations or in ways that produce unusual situations, requiring a particularly skilful response. A more capable and reliable automatic system makes the situation worse."

#ai #paradoxofai #luddite #aihype #tech #automation #automationparadox #security

Crash: how computers are setting us up for disaster

The Long Read: We increasingly let computers fly planes and carry out security checks. Driverless cars are next. But is our reliance on automation dangerously diminishing our skills?

The Guardian