@ai

You are very wrong. You don't seem to grasp the sheer scale of investment in US AI, or (more likely) you are in denial about it because you're a pro-AI PR dribble-bot.

Just like it says in the link in my previous post:
When the #AIbubble crashes it is likely to bring down the entire US economy, because the lending is from all other sectors, including pensions. #AI #AIscam #AIhype

@MikeImBack

AI will do the same to humanity, and the planet.

Please China, release some more free AI software that pisses on all of the US fascist AI companies and bust their fucking #aibubble

Why China Is Winning The Open Source AI Race
https://www.forbes.com/sites/timkeary/2026/03/25/why-china-is-winning-the-open-source-ai-race/

#AIslop #AI #AIhype #AIbubble #aibubbleburst #palantir #openai #microslop #googleai

@gerrymcgovern

also extraction by stealing (aka scraping) everything it claims to "know" from other peoples work.

I've heard something about #tencent making a cheap and decent standalone #AI - so hopefully that will bust the bubble for all those rightwing ghouls who own #ai companies

#fuckAI #AIhype #AIbubble #ai #aislop

[…] Even if the accuracy problems were solved, and AI-generated summaries reliably captured all the essential points of a text, it would still be a bad idea to use them. Creating your own summaries is a crucial step in any literature study. When you read and summarize a text, you create the neural connections necessary to memorize and apply the information well in an exam, experiment, or research paper. Generating it with a click is a harmful form of cognitive offloading and will erode these skills. Writing it yourself will reveal the nuances of an academic text and allow you to register those elements that you deem essential to whatever you are working on. 

https://www.tue.nl/en/our-university/library/library-news/24-02-2026-are-ai-generated-summaries-suitable-for-studying-and-research

@darby3

#theaicon #aihype #llm