#Autaxic Trilemma: the irreducible tension between three imperatives that are locally competitive but globally synergistic: Novelty (the drive to create), Efficiency (the drive to optimize), and Persistence (the drive to endure). #autaxys #science #reality

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15715865

The Autaxic Trilemma: A Theory of Generative Reality

The Autaxys Framework—from the Greek auto (self) and taxis (arrangement)—posits that reality is not a pre-existing stage but a computational process that perpetually generates itself. This process is driven by the resolution of a fundamental, inescapable paradox known as the Autaxic Trilemma: the irreducible tension between three imperatives that are locally competitive but globally synergistic: Novelty (the drive to create), Efficiency (the drive to optimize), and Persistence (the drive to endure). These imperatives are in a constant, dynamic negotiation that defines the state of the cosmos at every instant. A universe of perfect order (maximum P and E) is sterile (zero N); a universe of pure chaos (maximum N) is fleeting (zero P). The cosmos is a vast computation seeking to navigate this trilemma, where any local gain for one imperative often comes at a cost to the others, yet global coherence and complexity require the contribution of all three. The laws of physics are not immutable edicts but the most stable, emergent solutions forged in this negotiation. The search for a Theory of Everything is therefore the quest to reverse-engineer this cosmic algorithm: to identify the objective function that arbitrates the Trilemma, the primitive operators it employs, and the fundamental data types they act upon.

Zenodo

The laws of #physics are not immutable edicts but the most stable, emergent solutions forged in an "#Autaxic Trilemma"

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15715864

#autaxys #science

The Autaxic Trilemma: A Theory of Generative Reality

The Autaxys Framework—from the Greek auto (self) and taxis (arrangement)—posits that reality is not a pre-existing stage but a computational process that perpetually generates itself. This process is driven by the resolution of a fundamental, inescapable paradox known as the Autaxic Trilemma: the irreducible tension between three imperatives that are locally competitive but globally synergistic: Novelty (the drive to create), Efficiency (the drive to optimize), and Persistence (the drive to endure). These imperatives are in a constant, dynamic negotiation that defines the state of the cosmos at every instant. A universe of perfect order (maximum P and E) is sterile (zero N); a universe of pure chaos (maximum N) is fleeting (zero P). The cosmos is a vast computation seeking to navigate this trilemma, where any local gain for one imperative often comes at a cost to the others, yet global coherence and complexity require the contribution of all three. The laws of physics are not immutable edicts but the most stable, emergent solutions forged in this negotiation. The search for a Theory of Everything is therefore the quest to reverse-engineer this cosmic algorithm: to identify the objective function that arbitrates the Trilemma, the primitive operators it employs, and the fundamental data types they act upon.

Zenodo

The #Autaxic Trilemma answers these fundamental questions: What can exist? What is the optimal form of what exists? What continues to exist? #autaxys #openscience #research

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15715864

The Autaxic Trilemma: A Theory of Generative Reality

The Autaxys Framework—from the Greek auto (self) and taxis (arrangement)—posits that reality is not a pre-existing stage but a computational process that perpetually generates itself. This process is driven by the resolution of a fundamental, inescapable paradox known as the Autaxic Trilemma: the irreducible tension between three imperatives that are locally competitive but globally synergistic: Novelty (the drive to create), Efficiency (the drive to optimize), and Persistence (the drive to endure). These imperatives are in a constant, dynamic negotiation that defines the state of the cosmos at every instant. A universe of perfect order (maximum P and E) is sterile (zero N); a universe of pure chaos (maximum N) is fleeting (zero P). The cosmos is a vast computation seeking to navigate this trilemma, where any local gain for one imperative often comes at a cost to the others, yet global coherence and complexity require the contribution of all three. The laws of physics are not immutable edicts but the most stable, emergent solutions forged in this negotiation. The search for a Theory of Everything is therefore the quest to reverse-engineer this cosmic algorithm: to identify the objective function that arbitrates the Trilemma, the primitive operators it employs, and the fundamental data types they act upon.

Zenodo
Fibonacci, crystallization, Conway's Game of #Life, #evolution: There is much that we know about #patterns that came close to connecting the dots, but didn't quite make the leap to #autaxic #reality. #autaxys https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15682800
AUTX D-P6.2-2/4: Autaxys Formalisms/Formal Toolkit

The Autaxys framework introduces a fundamental reorientation of ontological perspective, moving decisively away from the traditional view of a universe comprising elementary, independently existing entities (particles, fields, strings, etc.) embedded within a pre-existing spacetime arena, governed by immutable, externally imposed laws derived from observation. In stark contrast, Autaxys proposes a universe fundamentally understood as a dynamic, self-organizing, self-consistent network of attributed relations undergoing continuous computation. This framework seeks to provide a generative, first-principles explanation for the emergence of observed physical reality in its entirety, encompassing its intricate structure across all scales, its fundamental dynamics, the properties of its constituents, the nature of its forces, and even the fabric of spacetime itself. This emergence is driven by a process of iterative relational processing and emergent self-consistency, guided by a fundamental principle of maximizing "existential fitness" or "relational aesthetics" within a continuously evolving attributed graph structure. The Autaxys hypothesis posits that the universe's observed regularities, its fundamental particles and forces, the emergent properties of spacetime, and the very "laws" that govern their behavior are not axiomatic irreducible primitives or externally imposed constraints. Rather, they arise intrinsically and dynamically from the iterative transformations of this fundamental relational substrate, governed by an underlying optimization principle. Specifically, the central hypothesis is that a sufficiently simple, minimal, and precisely defined set of initial principles governing this substrate and its dynamics – collectively termed an "Autaxys Configuration," acting as a cosmic "seed" or "algorithm" – can computationally generate the complexity, specificity, and fine-tuning characteristic of the physical universe. This generative approach stands in sharp contrast to traditional descriptive or inferential methodologies that model reality by postulating fundamental entities and laws based on observed patterns. Autaxys aims instead to *derive* the observed patterns, the fundamental constituents, and the effective laws of physics *from* the generative principles, thereby illuminating *why* reality takes its specific form, rather than merely describing *what* it is or *how* it behaves according to pre-defined, observationally inferred rules. It represents a form of computational natural philosophy dedicated to identifying the minimal generative principles – the simplest "source code" – capable of producing the observed universe as a preferred, stable, and highly fit outcome of a fundamental computational process, akin to discovering the most parsimonious algorithm that compiles into the complex and specific universe we perceive. The transition from a high-level conceptual framework (v1.9) to a formal, rigorous, and computationally grounded theory (v3.0) is a critical step towards rendering this hypothesis scientifically testable, amenable to large-scale computational simulation, and ultimately subject to empirical validation and potential falsification. This document formally defines the core postulates, derived concepts, and central hypothesis of the v3.0 framework, serving as the theoretical foundation and operational blueprint for all subsequent modeling and empirical validation efforts. It systematically outlines the fundamental ontology (P1) based on an attributed relational graph, the fundamental dynamics (P2) as a graph rewriting system, the fundamental state selection principle (P3) driven by Autaxic Lagrangian optimization, and the nature of emergent phenomena (DC1-DC4), including stable patterns, their quantifiable properties (AQNs), self-maintenance (Ontological Closure), and the intrinsic drive towards complexity and diversity (Exploration Drive). These foundational elements culminate in the central hypothesis (H1), which links these principles to the generation and properties of observed physical reality (H1.1-H1.5). This framework represents a unified attempt to derive the entire spectrum of physical reality, from fundamental particles and forces to spacetime and cosmology, from a minimal set of generative axioms rooted in relational processing and emergent self-consistency guided by a principle of existential fitness. The philosophical implications of this generative, relational ontology are profound, challenging traditional notions of substance, locality, and the nature of physical law, suggesting that reality's essence lies not in static things or external rules, but in dynamic, attributed relationships and the computational process of their evolution towards preferred states of coherence and fitness.

Zenodo
#Autaxys can test the #multiverse by simulating multiple universes from #autaxic models as independent origin events self-generated from zero predefined rules. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15682800
AUTX D-P6.2-2/4: Autaxys Formalisms/Formal Toolkit

The Autaxys framework introduces a fundamental reorientation of ontological perspective, moving decisively away from the traditional view of a universe comprising elementary, independently existing entities (particles, fields, strings, etc.) embedded within a pre-existing spacetime arena, governed by immutable, externally imposed laws derived from observation. In stark contrast, Autaxys proposes a universe fundamentally understood as a dynamic, self-organizing, self-consistent network of attributed relations undergoing continuous computation. This framework seeks to provide a generative, first-principles explanation for the emergence of observed physical reality in its entirety, encompassing its intricate structure across all scales, its fundamental dynamics, the properties of its constituents, the nature of its forces, and even the fabric of spacetime itself. This emergence is driven by a process of iterative relational processing and emergent self-consistency, guided by a fundamental principle of maximizing "existential fitness" or "relational aesthetics" within a continuously evolving attributed graph structure. The Autaxys hypothesis posits that the universe's observed regularities, its fundamental particles and forces, the emergent properties of spacetime, and the very "laws" that govern their behavior are not axiomatic irreducible primitives or externally imposed constraints. Rather, they arise intrinsically and dynamically from the iterative transformations of this fundamental relational substrate, governed by an underlying optimization principle. Specifically, the central hypothesis is that a sufficiently simple, minimal, and precisely defined set of initial principles governing this substrate and its dynamics – collectively termed an "Autaxys Configuration," acting as a cosmic "seed" or "algorithm" – can computationally generate the complexity, specificity, and fine-tuning characteristic of the physical universe. This generative approach stands in sharp contrast to traditional descriptive or inferential methodologies that model reality by postulating fundamental entities and laws based on observed patterns. Autaxys aims instead to *derive* the observed patterns, the fundamental constituents, and the effective laws of physics *from* the generative principles, thereby illuminating *why* reality takes its specific form, rather than merely describing *what* it is or *how* it behaves according to pre-defined, observationally inferred rules. It represents a form of computational natural philosophy dedicated to identifying the minimal generative principles – the simplest "source code" – capable of producing the observed universe as a preferred, stable, and highly fit outcome of a fundamental computational process, akin to discovering the most parsimonious algorithm that compiles into the complex and specific universe we perceive. The transition from a high-level conceptual framework (v1.9) to a formal, rigorous, and computationally grounded theory (v3.0) is a critical step towards rendering this hypothesis scientifically testable, amenable to large-scale computational simulation, and ultimately subject to empirical validation and potential falsification. This document formally defines the core postulates, derived concepts, and central hypothesis of the v3.0 framework, serving as the theoretical foundation and operational blueprint for all subsequent modeling and empirical validation efforts. It systematically outlines the fundamental ontology (P1) based on an attributed relational graph, the fundamental dynamics (P2) as a graph rewriting system, the fundamental state selection principle (P3) driven by Autaxic Lagrangian optimization, and the nature of emergent phenomena (DC1-DC4), including stable patterns, their quantifiable properties (AQNs), self-maintenance (Ontological Closure), and the intrinsic drive towards complexity and diversity (Exploration Drive). These foundational elements culminate in the central hypothesis (H1), which links these principles to the generation and properties of observed physical reality (H1.1-H1.5). This framework represents a unified attempt to derive the entire spectrum of physical reality, from fundamental particles and forces to spacetime and cosmology, from a minimal set of generative axioms rooted in relational processing and emergent self-consistency guided by a principle of existential fitness. The philosophical implications of this generative, relational ontology are profound, challenging traditional notions of substance, locality, and the nature of physical law, suggesting that reality's essence lies not in static things or external rules, but in dynamic, attributed relationships and the computational process of their evolution towards preferred states of coherence and fitness.

Zenodo
The Fibonacci sequence is a perfect analogy for #autaxic self-generation (P1, P2). It shows how a simple rule and seed can create an entire, complex history. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15682800
AUTX D-P6.2-2/4: Autaxys Formalisms/Formal Toolkit

The Autaxys framework introduces a fundamental reorientation of ontological perspective, moving decisively away from the traditional view of a universe comprising elementary, independently existing entities (particles, fields, strings, etc.) embedded within a pre-existing spacetime arena, governed by immutable, externally imposed laws derived from observation. In stark contrast, Autaxys proposes a universe fundamentally understood as a dynamic, self-organizing, self-consistent network of attributed relations undergoing continuous computation. This framework seeks to provide a generative, first-principles explanation for the emergence of observed physical reality in its entirety, encompassing its intricate structure across all scales, its fundamental dynamics, the properties of its constituents, the nature of its forces, and even the fabric of spacetime itself. This emergence is driven by a process of iterative relational processing and emergent self-consistency, guided by a fundamental principle of maximizing "existential fitness" or "relational aesthetics" within a continuously evolving attributed graph structure. The Autaxys hypothesis posits that the universe's observed regularities, its fundamental particles and forces, the emergent properties of spacetime, and the very "laws" that govern their behavior are not axiomatic irreducible primitives or externally imposed constraints. Rather, they arise intrinsically and dynamically from the iterative transformations of this fundamental relational substrate, governed by an underlying optimization principle. Specifically, the central hypothesis is that a sufficiently simple, minimal, and precisely defined set of initial principles governing this substrate and its dynamics – collectively termed an "Autaxys Configuration," acting as a cosmic "seed" or "algorithm" – can computationally generate the complexity, specificity, and fine-tuning characteristic of the physical universe. This generative approach stands in sharp contrast to traditional descriptive or inferential methodologies that model reality by postulating fundamental entities and laws based on observed patterns. Autaxys aims instead to *derive* the observed patterns, the fundamental constituents, and the effective laws of physics *from* the generative principles, thereby illuminating *why* reality takes its specific form, rather than merely describing *what* it is or *how* it behaves according to pre-defined, observationally inferred rules. It represents a form of computational natural philosophy dedicated to identifying the minimal generative principles – the simplest "source code" – capable of producing the observed universe as a preferred, stable, and highly fit outcome of a fundamental computational process, akin to discovering the most parsimonious algorithm that compiles into the complex and specific universe we perceive. The transition from a high-level conceptual framework (v1.9) to a formal, rigorous, and computationally grounded theory (v3.0) is a critical step towards rendering this hypothesis scientifically testable, amenable to large-scale computational simulation, and ultimately subject to empirical validation and potential falsification. This document formally defines the core postulates, derived concepts, and central hypothesis of the v3.0 framework, serving as the theoretical foundation and operational blueprint for all subsequent modeling and empirical validation efforts. It systematically outlines the fundamental ontology (P1) based on an attributed relational graph, the fundamental dynamics (P2) as a graph rewriting system, the fundamental state selection principle (P3) driven by Autaxic Lagrangian optimization, and the nature of emergent phenomena (DC1-DC4), including stable patterns, their quantifiable properties (AQNs), self-maintenance (Ontological Closure), and the intrinsic drive towards complexity and diversity (Exploration Drive). These foundational elements culminate in the central hypothesis (H1), which links these principles to the generation and properties of observed physical reality (H1.1-H1.5). This framework represents a unified attempt to derive the entire spectrum of physical reality, from fundamental particles and forces to spacetime and cosmology, from a minimal set of generative axioms rooted in relational processing and emergent self-consistency guided by a principle of existential fitness. The philosophical implications of this generative, relational ontology are profound, challenging traditional notions of substance, locality, and the nature of physical law, suggesting that reality's essence lies not in static things or external rules, but in dynamic, attributed relationships and the computational process of their evolution towards preferred states of coherence and fitness.

Zenodo
All the #laws of #physics–everything in the #universe–from a non-materialist origin, #autaxic #pattern-based #reality, are a lot simpler (parsimonious) and much more explanatory.

Antimatter is much more parsimonious from a non-#physics perspective. Even Dirac was puzzled by his finding. Like sound-canceling headphones, "annihilation" in #autaxic #pattern-based #reality is simply another complementary pattern that together neutralize each other.

Think #Magritte: "Everything we see hides another thing."

#autaxys

#Autaxys formal #hypothesis (H1): Given a sufficiently simple and well-defined initial set of Proto-property spaces a minimal #Cosmic Algorithm (graph rewrite rules), and a computable #Autaxic Lagrangian that embodies the Economy of Existence, the iterative application of the local maximization #dynamic to an initially simple or random graph state will spontaneously generate a non-trivial diversity of stable, emergent #patterns.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15662031

There are many similarities between #autaxic "undifferentiated potentiality" and the #BigBang origin event, demonstrating autaxys' predictive ability without assuming #matter or a #singularity. And, critically, #autaxys answers the question "What was before the Big Bang?"