@eff

Yes it is not about kids as pushed by the Pals of antir. But in can be about kids and all about privacy.

I did it 2001, I can restore it from memory 2026. As I did research about the state of the tech: now what was novelty then now is at the core, ready and humming. So proper #agever can be implemented the same way as in 2001, just all needed infrastructure already is in place. You can have age verification for your kid without puting whole adult population dancing to the skynet camers on their way to wikipedia.

Is anybody from the pleiade of NGOs "fighting for freedom" willing to fed me for a month and put a younger MBP on my lap? Or is it all about chasing the rabbit and sending the fundraiser junk emails? PM me.

@eff
> most sensitive and immutable data” — names, faces, birthdays, home addresses — to their online activity

Not at all. This is a strawmen meticously built by #bigTech lobbyists.

The #agever is possible without giving up privacy of the users. Just there is no "political will" to make it this way. Once upon a time I tried to push such non-intruding system through RFC editor. I had been told it would be "against policy to be not political" and it will not get thru the IETF. It did not help I was a co-founder of the ISOC Chapter in my country.

Will #eff support going thru the IETF process against all that money that is now close to get the whole planet biometrics reaped/robbed? If so I might revive this RFC sketch and bring it to the current times.