🧵1/2

A National Day of Atonement

Robert Jensen

One indication of moral progress in the United States would be the replacement of Thanksgiving Day and its self-indulgent family feasting with a National Day of Atonement accompanied by a self-reflective collective fasting.

In fact, indigenous people have offered such a model; since 1970 they have marked the fourth Thursday of November as a Day of Mourning in a spiritual/political ceremony on Coles Hill overlooking Plymouth Rock, Massachusetts, one of the early sites of the European invasion of the Americas.

Not only is the thought of such a change in this white-supremacist holiday impossible to imagine, but the very mention of the idea sends most Americans into apoplectic fits — which speaks volumes about our historical hypocrisy and its relation to the contemporary politics of empire in the United States.

That the world’s great powers achieved ‘greatness’ through criminal brutality on a grand scale is not news, of course. That those same societies are reluctant to highlight this history of barbarism also is predictable.

But in the United States, this reluctance to acknowledge our original sin — the genocide of indigenous people — is of special importance today. It’s now routine — even among conservative commentators — to describe the United States as an empire, so long as everyone understands we are an inherently benevolent one. Because all our history contradicts that claim, history must be twisted and tortured to serve the purposes of the powerful.

One vehicle for taming history is various patriotic holidays, with Thanksgiving at the heart of U.S. myth-building. From an early age, we Americans hear a story about the hearty Pilgrims, whose search for freedom took them from England to Massachusetts. There, aided by the friendly Wampanoag Indians, they survived in a new and harsh environment, leading to a harvest feast in 1621 following the Pilgrims first winter.

Some aspects of the conventional story are true enough. But it’s also true that by 1637 Massachusetts Gov. John Winthrop was proclaiming a thanksgiving for the successful massacre of hundreds of Pequot Indian men, women and children, part of the long and bloody process of opening up additional land to the English invaders. The pattern would repeat itself across the continent until between 95 and 99 percent of American Indians had been exterminated and the rest were left to assimilate into white society or die off on reservations, out of the view of polite society.

Simply put: Thanksgiving is the day when the dominant white culture (and, sadly, most of the rest of the non-white but non-indigenous population) celebrates the beginning of a genocide that was, in fact, blessed by the men we hold up as our heroic founding fathers.

The first president, George Washington, in 1783 said he preferred buying Indians’ land rather than driving them off it because that was like driving ‘wild beasts’ from the forest. He compared Indians to wolves, ‘both being beasts of prey, tho’ they differ in shape.’ Thomas Jefferson — president #3 and author of the Declaration of Independence, which refers to Indians as the ‘merciless Indian Savages’ — was known to romanticize Indians and their culture, but that didn’t stop him in 1807 from writing to his secretary of war that in a coming conflict with certain tribes, ‘[W]e shall destroy all of them.’

As the genocide was winding down in the early 20th century, Theodore Roosevelt (president #26) defended the expansion of whites across the continent as an inevitable process ‘due solely to the power of the mighty civilized races which have not lost the fighting instinct, and which by their expansion are gradually bringing peace into the red wastes where the barbarian peoples of the world hold sway.’ Roosevelt also once said, ‘I don’t go so far as to think that the only good Indians are dead Indians, but I believe nine out of ten are, and I shouldn’t like to inquire too closely into the case of the tenth.’

How does a country deal with the fact that some of its most revered historical figures had certain moral values and political views virtually identical to Nazis? Here’s how ‘respectable’ politicians, pundits, and professors play the game:

But when one brings into historical discussions any facts and interpretations that contest the celebratory story and make people uncomfortable — such as the genocide of indigenous people as the foundational act in the creation of the United States — suddenly the value of history drops precipitously and one is asked, ‘Why do you insist on dwelling on the past?’

https://www.counterpunch.org/2005/11/21/a-national-day-of-atonement/

#thanksgiving #UShistory #UShist

"Justice and Peace or Tyranny and Violence?" https://markstoneman.com/2025/07/04/justice-and-peace-or-tyranny.html

I blogged about some of the implications of the godawful legislation that extremists in Congress have passed. #USpol #UShist #revolution

"Justice and Peace or Tyranny and Violence?" https://markstoneman.com/2025/07/04/justice-and-peace-or-tyranny.html

I blogged about some of the implications of the godawful legislation that extremists in Congress have passed. #USpol #UShist #revolution

Regarding our past: "Americans would experience moments of unity … but its distinction has been its ability to withstand division …"

– David M. Shribman, "History Lends Context to Contemporary Conflicts," Conway Daily Sun, April 11, 2025

Shribman's hope is necessary, even as the U.S. history he musters does little to banish the very real specter of fascism we know from Europe.

Quote from https://www.conwaydailysun.com/opinion/columns/national-perspective-history-lends-context-to-contemporary-conflicts/article_b3a81209-7cb0-42a9-8adb-d178e0222864.html

#USpol #UShist #NH

#WHM repost: “World War Two Poster Marking the Dignity and Humanity of Black Women on the Home Front” blogged at https://markstoneman.com/2025/02/08/world-war-two-poster-marking.html

#WarAndSociety #WWII #BlackHistory #WomensHistory #Citizenship #UShist #History #OldPosters

"In the Conduct of my Newspaper I carefully excluded all Libelling and Personal Abuse.... Whenever I was solicited to insert any thing of that kind, and the Writers pleaded as they generally did, the Liberty of the Press, *and that a Newspaper was like a Stage Coach in which any one who would pay had a Right to a Place*, my Answer was, that I would print the Piece separately if desired ... but that I would not take upon me to spread his Detraction, and that having contracted with my Subscribers to furnish them with what might be either useful or entertaining, I could not fill their Papers with private Altercation ... without doing them manifest Injustice.” (Emphasis added)

Long before the internet, the telephone, or even the telegraph, the confusion of the press with a common carrier existed, apparently spread by 18th century trolls who felt they had a right not merely to hold opinions, but use someone else's property to distribute them.

https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Franklin/01-01-02-0061

#FreeSpeech #USHist