>> I mean it's quite strange, never having a single prove for anything after 3 month of conflict, but supporting every allegation of Israel.
Hi friends at #Mastodon:
Do any of you have a "single prove for anything after 3 month of conflict?" If so, please share with this lazy and ignorant #TrollInAHole
I think, he might be #HeavenlyPossum re-incarnated 😂
⬆️
[Rethreading, as thread was broken]
@HeavenlyPossum is a #TrollInAHole who has an endless list of little turds like the above from which he will pick one turdlet at a time and keep pivoting to waste your entire day.
Just click through that hashtag to see a sample of his one day's work
Even his bio says "But then, I repeat myself" — Fair warning 😂 and I wish I had heeded that earlier
⬆️ Update: Tagging this with #ReplyGuy, that I neither knew the existence nor use of at the time.
@HeavenlyPossum is a #TrollInAHole who has an endless list of little turds like the above from which he will pick one turdlet at a time and keep pivoting to waste your entire day.
Just click through that hashtag to see a sample of his one day's work
Even his bio says "But then, I repeat myself" — Fair warning 😂 and I wish I had heeded that earlier
>> Is there another term I should search for that would reveal the information
No, #LazyClown 🤡
Just ask #ChatGPT to summarize the book for you and find the answer you are looking for.
I don't have time to spoon-feed you
>> Surely you’ve read it and can refer me to the part I should read
If I had not read it, there would not be such a huge body of toots referencing various details of #Arab-#Israeli conflict that I sourced from that book.
#LazyClown wants me to spoon-feed him instead of lifting a finger himself or firing a neuron on his own 🤡
Dude, nice sleight of hand, changing which claim was unsourced — From "Israeli state denied citizenship to Palestinians" to “Arabs stopped being 'fellow citizens'"
I laid the food on a silver platter for you. Don't expect me to spoon-feed you 🙄
One can lead a horse to water, but cannot make it drink.
One can lead another to a book, but cannot make another read.
Even if one can make another #read one cannot make another #think.
>> I do not believe for a single moment that you’re actually interested in, or would read and actually consider, any historical source
Dude! Have you followed my timeline?
Almost ALL of my toots come with citations and copious links to #history.
Yours (including the one above)? Never!
Without citations of credible published historical information that provides context, your whole argument is worthless.
I don't have time to respond with thoughtful comments once you've already exposed yourself as a member of a propaganda network I called out above.
Ramesh #NotGoingBack