@katvogt

That last point on "a locomotor adaptation model accounts for most direct returns" reminds me very much of the #Drosophila larva local search:

"Finding a path: Local search behavior of Drosophila larvae", Kromp et al. 2024 (Andreas Thum's lab)
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.21.624685v1

#DrosophilaLarva #foraging #SearchStrategies #neuroscience

Finding a path: Local search behavior of Drosophila larvae

Orientation and navigation are essential features of animals living in changing environments. Typically, animals integrate a variety of allothetic and idiothetic cues to achieve their navigational goals. Allothetic cues, such as visual or chemical landmarks from the environment, provide an external frame of reference. In contrast, idiothetic cues are based on internal proprioceptive feedback and internal copies of motor commands. When Drosophila larvae are exposed briefly to a Teflon container holding a food stimulus, they show a characteristic behavior as soon as the container is removed: They briefly crawl away from the detected resource, remain in its vicinity and then return to the area where they experienced the earlier stimulus. We quantified this behavior with respect to the chemosensory nature of the stimulus, starvation time of the larvae, and agarose concentration of the test plate substrate. We conclude that this behavior represents a centered local search. Furthermore, we exclude various external stimuli (vision and taste), which suggests that possibly idiothetic as opposed to allothetic cues have a stronger influence on the larval local search behavior. In the long term, this behavioral description will enable us to gain insights into the comparability of larval foraging strategies. We also want to investigate whether, despite the simpler organization of the larval brain and the alleged lack of a central complex, a brain region that is important for orientation and navigation in adult Drosophila and other insects, there are common solutions for the brain circuits underlying search behavior. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. * AM : amyl acetate Crv : center revisits CX : central complex EB : ellipsoid body E-PG : ellipsoid body-protocerebral bridge-gall neurons FB : fan-shaped body GRN : gustatory receptor neuron MB : mushroom body NO : noduli OR : olfactory receptor ORN : olfactory receptor neuron PB : protocerebral bridge WT-CS : wild type Canton-S

bioRxiv

@katvogt

On the same topic:

"Recent experience and internal state shape local search strategies in flies", Goldschmidt et al. (Hannah Haberken's lab)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982226001648

* Search driven by real food expands, shifting with satiety from short to long trips
* Purely gustatory-induced searches are shorter without scaling
* A locomotor adaptation model accounts for most direct returns in long trips

#Drosophila #foraging #SearchStrategies #neuroscience

that thing where you use a discussion post about the #berrypicking paper to complain for 1200 words about chasing all over Madrid trying to find your daughter a riding helmet #humanInformationBehavior #searchStrategies

rewrite this title in 9 words9 Reasons You Must Use It for Search #SearchBenefits

Hashtags: #searchengineoptimization #searchengine #searchstrategies Google #Bing #Yahoo Summery: Google Lens is a visual search tool available on the Google app for Android and iOS. It allows users to search what they see with their camera, take pictures or screenshots, or long press images to get visual results. Here are some of the features of Google Lens: 1. Fact Check or Verify an…

https://webappia.com/rewrite-this-title-in-9-words9-reasons-you-must-use-it-for-search-searchbenefits/

rewrite this title in 9 words9 Reasons You Must Use It for Search #SearchBenefits

Google Lens has amazing features from verifying the profile pictures of your Tinder match to searching a skin condition.

Webappia