John Wycliffe

His last name is also spelled: Wyclif, Wickliffe, & Wicklyf.

He’s an English scholastic philosopher, Christian reformer, Catholic priest, & a theology professor at the University of Oxford. He’s often called the “Morning Star of the Reformation.”

He made radical challenges to the Roman Catholic Church like advocating for or made a vernacular translation of the Vulgate Bible into Middle English. He paved the way for the Protestant Reformation nearly 200 years before Martin Luther.

Before he was a reformer, Wycliffe was a titan of Scholasticism at Oxford. At the time, the intellectual world was divided between Realist & Norminalists. The Norminalists, like William of Ockham, argued that “universals” (like the concept of “justice” or “humanity”) were just names (nomina) we give to groups of individual things.

John was a fierce Realist. He believed that universals were real entities that existed in the mind of God. For Wycliffe, everything in the physical world was a direct reflection of a divine archetype.

Wycliffe’s most radical political theory was the Dominion of Grace. He argued that all authority (dominium) is a gift from God. Which meant that the church wasn’t allowed to own property or have ecclesiastic courts, & men in mortal sin weren’t entitled to exercise authority in the church or state, nor to own property. He added a dangerous caveat: only those in a state of grace have a right to exercise authority.

Wycliffe’s later followers (derogatorily called Lollards by their orthodox contemporaries in the 15th & 16th centuries. Lollards meaning “mumblers” or “idlers.”) adopted a number of the beliefs attributed to Wycliff such as theological virtues, predestination, iconoclasm, & the notion of caesaropapism, with some questioning the veneration of saints, the sacraments, requiem masses, transubstantiation, monasticism, & the legitimacy/role of the Papacy.

Wycliffe was born in the village of Hipswell, near Richmond in the North Riding of Yorkshire, England. In 1356, Wycliffe completed his bachelor of arts degree at Merton College as a junior fellow. That same year, he produced a small treatise, The Last Age of the Church.

In 1361, he was Master of Balliol College in Oxford. That year, he was presented by the college to the parish of Fillingham in Lincolnshire. For this, he had to give up the headship of Balliol College, though he could continue to live at Oxford.

Wycliffe’s greatest legacy is his role in the 1st complete translation of the Bible into Middle English (circa 1382). At the time, the Bible was only available in the Latin Vulgate. This was accessible solely to the educated clergy.

Wycliffe believed that the Bible was the ultimate authority. Then every person (from the King to the “plowman”), needed to be able to read it.

Wycliffe didn’t just translate words. He helped create the English language. He’s credited with introducing, or popularizing, over 1,000 words into English, including: female, justice, communication, treasure, & glory.

His “potent” ideas were blamed for the Peasants’ Revolt of 1381. Wycliffe didn’t endorse the violence, however the rebels used his discourse of “equality before God” & Wycliffe’s critiques of Church wealth to justify their demands.

In the U.S. culture, Wycliffe’s legacy is preserved in 2 distinct ways:

  • The Democratic Spirit of the Bible: The American religious tradition of individual Bible interpretation & the rejection of centralized ecclesiastical authority can be traced directly back to Wycliffe’s “priesthood of all believers.”
  • Wycliffe Bible Translators: Founded in 1942 in California by William Cameron Townsend. This organization (now 1 of the largest of its kind in the world) was named in honor of John Wycliffe. It carries on his mission by translating the Bible into thousands of indigenous languages worldwide.

Wycliffe passed away from a stroke, during a Mass, in 1834. In 1415, the Council of Constance declared him a heretic. In 1428, by order of Pope Martin V, his remains were exhumed from his grave in Lutterworth, burned to ashes, & cast into the River Swift.

Make a one-time donation

Your contribution is appreciated.

Donate

Make a monthly donation

Your contribution is appreciated.

Donate monthly

Make a yearly donation

Your contribution is appreciated.

Donate yearly

#1356 #1361 #1382 #1415 #1428 #15thCentury #16thCentury #1834 #1842 #BalliolCollege #bible #Caesaropapism #California #Catholic #DominionOfGrace #Dominium #England #Fillingham #Hipswell #Iconoclasm #IndigenousLanguages #JohnWycliffe #LatinVulgate #Lincolnshire #Lollards #MartinLuther #Mass #MertonCollege #MiddleEnglish #Monasticism #MorningStarOfTheReformation #Nomina #Norminalists #NorthRiding #Oxford #Papacy #PeasantsRevoltOf1381 #Pope #PopeMartinV #Predestination #ProtestantReformation #Realists #RequiemMasses #Richmond #RiverSwift #RomanCatholicChurch #Sacraments #Scholasticism #TheLastAgeOfTheChurch #Translate #Transubstantiation #Universals #UniversityOfOxford #VulgateBible #WilliamCameronTownsend #WilliamOfOckham #WycliffeBibleTranslators #WycliffeSBible #Yorkshire

#Constructivism vs. #Realism - Would you rather have the red pill or the blue pill?”

The following #essay has actually been planned for some time and comes from the series “How much #construction does #reality contain?”, which I had already introduced with the older text #realists vs. #nominalists - or the old #dualism #thinking vs. #language.

More at: https://philosophies.de/index.php/2025/01/04/konstruktivismus-vs-realismus/

#Realists vs. #nominalists - or the old #dualism#thinking vs. #language

In the next series, I would like to revisit an old problem that deals with the question: “How much #construction does #reality contain?”. To determine this, you don't even need “#VR (#virtual #reality) glasses” to “look the supposed #reality in the eye”.

https://museum-der-philosophie.de/?p=6415

or: https://philosophies.de/index.php/2024/07/02/realisten-vs-nominalisten/

Realisten vs. Nominalisten: der Universalienstreit im Mittelalter – Museum für Europäische Philosophie

“Realists. The only ones who really know what’s going on.”

“I’m half full. I’m half empty. I think this is piss.”

#quote #quotes #cartoon #funny #meme #realists

Many administrations evolve in a kind of tug of war between the #activists who demand attention to their pet causes and the political #realists who grab the candidate’s arm and tap the sign that reads, “It’s the economy, stupid.”

And then, every few years, the majority steps back in,
determines whether politicians have taken care of prices, crime and peace, and then ruthlessly punishes failure
— regardless of whether the activists got what they wanted, and even if they might agree with the activists’ concerns.

⭐️With Trump, the dynamic is different.
He’s so consumed with his grievances and his base’s grievances that rather than there being a tug of war between activists and pragmatists for the politician’s attention,
⚠️the activists and the politician are both aligned against the pragmatists.

That was the clear direction of Trump’s first term.
At first he surrounded himself with serious people.
Think of the contrast, for example, between Jim #Mattis as secretary of defense and Pete #Hegseth,
or between Alex #Azar, the secretary of health and human services for most of Trump’s first term, and an anti-vax conspiracy theorist like Robert F. #Kennedy Jr.

But the serious people told him no. They tried to block his worst instincts.
So they were purged.

💥Throughout the campaign, Trump ran with two messages.
🔸On the airwaves, he convinced millions of Americans that they were electing the Trump of January 2019, when inflation was low, and the border was under reasonable control.
🔸At his rallies, he told MAGA that it was electing the Trump of January 2021, the man unleashed from establishment control and hellbent on burning it all down.

➡️But here is his fundamental problem:
The desires of his heart and the grievances of his base are ultimately incompatible with the demands of the majority,
🔥and the more he pursues his own priorities, the more he’ll revive his opposition.

❇️He’ll end his political career as an unpopular politician who ushered in a Democratic majority yet again.
The reason goes deeper than #ideology (many of his nominees are extremists)
or #scandal (Kennedy, Hegseth, and Matt Gaetz, each have their own histories of alleged sexual misconduct, for example).

Ultimately, it goes to #competence:
Can you do the job we ultimately hired you to do❓

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/17/opinion/trump-kennedy-gaetz-hegseth.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Opinion | Donald Trump Is Already Starting to Fail

The president-elect is planting the seeds of his own political demise.

The New York Times

#Realists vs. #nominalists - or the old #dualism "#thinking vs. #language"

I would like to start this series with a look back at the "Universalienstreit im Mittelalter". But instead of looking into my archives, I would like to refer you to the summarized form that I published as an article on the very readable site "Museum für Europäische Philosophie" by Klaus Fürst. So here is the link:

https://museum-der-philosophie.de/?p=6415

or: https://philosophies.de/index.php/2024/07/02/realisten-vs-nominalisten/

Realisten vs. Nominalisten: der Universalienstreit im Mittelalter – Museum für Europäische Philosophie

#Realists vs. #nominalists - or the old #dualism "#thinking vs. #language"

In the next series, I would like to revisit an old problem that deals with the question: "How much construction does reality contain?". In the following essay, I would like to point out that this question is actually much older than one might think and has its origins in the Middle Ages, but has nevertheless lost none of its topicality.

https://museum-der-philosophie.de/?p=6415

or: https://philosophies.de/index.php/2024/07/02/realisten-vs-nominalisten/

Realisten vs. Nominalisten: der Universalienstreit im Mittelalter – Museum für Europäische Philosophie

#Realists vs. #nominalists - or the old #dualism "#thinking vs. #language"

In the following, I would therefore like to shed new light on this old topic in order to perhaps make a small contribution to overcoming the supposed dualism of "realists vs. nominalists". I had noticed, not only in the numerous contributions in the comments section on my site (for which I would like to take this opportunity to thank you once again), but also in the contributions on social media, that the discourse was very often about the correct interpretation of the meaning of a term.

To begin with, this is not a particularly spectacular observation, let alone insight, as the inadequacy of language usage is well known and not just in the circles of feuilletonists or linguists. Modern philosophy in the form of the epistemologist and philosopher Markus Gabriel had already dealt with this problem in his book "Why the world does not exist" in his critique of an "ontology of meaning".

https://museum-der-philosophie.de/?p=6415

https://philosophies.de/index.php/2024/07/02/realisten-vs-nominalisten/

Realisten vs. Nominalisten: der Universalienstreit im Mittelalter – Museum für Europäische Philosophie

#Realists vs. #nominalists - or the old #dualism "#thinking vs. #language"

In the next series, I would like to revisit an old problem that deals with the question: "How much construction does reality contain?". In the following essay, I would like to point out that this question is actually much older than one might think and has its origins in the Middle Ages, but has nevertheless lost none of its topicality.

https://museum-der-philosophie.de/?p=6415

or: https://philosophies.de/index.php/2024/07/02/realisten-vs-nominalisten/

Realisten vs. Nominalisten: der Universalienstreit im Mittelalter – Museum für Europäische Philosophie

Word Search Puzzle 387

Word List : #chaps #gouter #galanga #hibernal #agatha #unlike #spruntly #curcumas #marvelry #yauds #ferngale #horseess #linin #heptode #realists #falcata #shapier #tankful

Kara Finance