Somewhat surprisingly given the findings from inspections over the last five years (including the views of people on probation for the last two), overall perceptions were positive – a mean score of 4.36 out of 5.
#CriminalJustice #Criminology #ProceduralJustice #CommunityJustice #UKPrisons #Probation
https://www.russellwebster.com/procedural-justice-in-probation/
You are so right. About their values.
This is not a group of people who can think about #PublicService in a meaningful way.
This is not a group of people who have allegiance to concepts like #constitutionality, #TruthTelling, #ProceduralJustice, or #DoingTheRightThing. They are not there to serve the country or the #BestInterests of *all* of its people.
I'm ashamed, as a US citizen, to acknowledge this; however, it does seem to be the case.
Background To achieve climate targets, a transition to low-carbon energy production is necessary. However, conflicts between different interests, values and priorities, particularly at the community level, can constrain this transition. This paper aims to analyze lines of conflict and opportunities to build bridges between conflicting interests in the expansion of wind energy in Germany at the local level, to achieve successful implementation of wind energy projects. Results Our analysis of four cases of local-level wind energy projects in Germany shows that limited local options for action reinforce the need for local actors to maximize the benefits of energy transition projects. In addition to the conflict over scarce space, the lines of conflict at the local level run primarily along the dimensions of costs and benefits, winners and losers. Real or perceived procedural and distributive injustices had the potential to fuel resistance to wind energy projects in the analyzed cases. However, wind energy projects were successfully implemented despite the presence of local opposition. Conclusions The results show that, by integrating procedural and distributive justice into the project planning and implementation and offering tailored solutions, community support for expansion of renewable energy projects can be enhanced. The paper advances the concept of societal ownership (“gesellschaftliche Trägerschaft”), which suggests the willingness of members of a community to tolerate decisions even when some conflicts related to the decision remain unresolved. Societal ownership is presented as an alternative to the concept of simple acceptance; it implies a more positive, more supportive community attitude, where members aim to address conflict as a normal aspect of decision making. Rather than sweeping alternative opinions aside, the community addresses alternative viewpoints, seeking to achieve greater procedural and distributive justice. In this way, a sense of societal ownership of a project can develop, enhancing its likelihood of success.
Rather, ethicists can help facilitate and sometimes even mediate conversations & disagreements in ways that can help teams & communities identify key assumptions and value conflicts (2). This work is useful from a #ProceduralJustice perspective even if consensus is impossible
4/
Rather, ethicists can help facilitate and sometimes even mediate conversations & disagreements in ways that can help teams & communities identify key assumptions and value conflicts (2). This work is useful from a #ProceduralJustice perspective even if consensus is impossible
4/
CM Xanthos
A.Stringer
Deborah Elizabeth Finn
Sybille Reitz
Daniel S. Goldberg