Aiden Bai (@aidenybai)
์์ฑ์๋ ์ฝ๋ฉ ์์ด์ ํธ ๋๋ถ์ ์ฌ์ด๋ ํ๋ก์ ํธ๋ฅผ ๋ง์ด ์์ํ๊ณ ์๋ฃํ ์ ์๊ฒ ๋๋ค๋ฉฐ ํ์ฌ ๊ฐ๋ฐ ์คํ์ ๊ณต์ ํฉ๋๋ค. ํจํค์ง ๋งค๋์ ๋ก pnpm(ํน์ ์์ ์คํฌ๋ฆฝํธ์ bun), ์น์ฌ์ดํธ๋ next.js, ํ ์คํธ ํ๊ฒฝ์ผ๋ก vite, ์ฝ๋ ํ์ง ๊ฒ์ฌ์ oxc, ๋ฒ๋ค๋ฌ๋ก tsup์ ์ฌ์ฉํ๋ค๊ณ ์๊ฐํฉ๋๋ค.
Wow this is perfect for keeping NPM dependencies secure ๐ฅ
๐ฎ **deputui** โ A TUI for reviewing release notes of your NPM dependencies
๐ฏ Pipe in pnpm outdated, skim release notes and select exactly which updates to install
๐ฆ Written in Rust & built with @ratatui_rs
โญ GitHub: https://github.com/twiddler/deputui
#rustlang #ratatui #tui #npm #pnpm #security #packaging #dependencies
Speeding up Docker builds with pnpm store caching ๐
If your containers keep re-downloading dependencies, youโre losing a lot of time. pnpm uses a global storeโso persisting it with a named Docker volume makes pnpm install much faster after the first run.
Short guide: https://l.zfir.dev/9MFJSUo
pnpm in 2025, by @kochan.io (@pnpm):
Why not go whole hog? While not have wrapper / generic methods for actions, like "install <package>".
That way you can define what package manager you're using, without needing to know specifics. And swapping between them would be easy.
The more advanced stuff could then be handled if / when it was required ๐ค
This has drawbacks, and complexities, but at the moment I'm really not getting what's special or valuable about Corepack.
The GitHub docs state:
> In practical terms, **Corepack lets you use Yarn, npm, and pnpm without having to install them**.
But... it looks like Corepack just downloads and installs them *for you*. At least it's the right version / hash checked.
I feel like I'm missing something here...
Rad Web Hosting
Nemeski
sayzard
Orhun Parmaksฤฑz ๐พ
Zafir SK Heerah
Frontend Dogma
Harry W.
Paul Denya