New study: "#OpenAccess via #repositories (#GreenOA) correlates with higher citation counts and a lower probability of zero citations. In contrast, OA via the publisher's website without an explicit #OpenLicense (#BronzeOA) is associated with higher citation counts but also with a higher probability of zero citations."
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.15384v1

#Citations #LibreOA #OACA #OpenAccessCitationAdvantage #ScholComm

A two-stage model for factors influencing citation counts

This work aims to study a count response random variable, the number of citations of a research paper, affected by some explanatory variables through a suitable regression model. Due to the fact that the count variable exhibits substantial variation since the sample variance is larger than the sample mean, the classical Poisson regression model seems not to be appropriate. We concentrate attention on the negative binomial regression model, which allows the variance of each measurement to be a function of its predicted value. Nevertheless, the process of citations of papers may be divided into two parts. In the first stage, the paper has no citations, and the second part provides the intensity of the citations. A hurdle model for separating the documents with citations and those without citations is considered. The dataset for the empirical application consisted of 43,190 research papers in the field of Economics and Business from 2014-2021, obtained from The Lens database. Citation counts and social attention scores for each article were gathered from Altmetric database. The main findings indicate that both collaboration and funding have a positive impact on citation counts and reduce the likelihood of receiving zero citations. Higher journal impact factors lead to higher citation counts, while lower peer review ratings lead to fewer citations and a higher probability of zero citations. Mentions in news, blogs, and social media have varying but generally limited effects on citation counts. Open access via repositories (green OA) correlates with higher citation counts and a lower probability of zero citations. In contrast, OA via the publisher's website without an explicit open license (bronze OA) is associated with higher citation counts but also with a higher probability of zero citations.

arXiv.org

New study: In the digital humanities, #OpenAccess articles are cited significantly more often than non-OA articles.
https://www.dline.info/ijis/fulltext/v17n1/ijisv17n1_5.pdf

#DH #OACA #OpenAccessCitationAdvantage #ScholComm

New study: " #OpenAccess increases both interdisciplinary and within-discipline citations in many fields and increases only interdisciplinary citations in chemistry, computer science, and clinical medicine." arxiv.org/abs/2411.14653 #OACA #OpenAccessCitationAdvantage

Does Open Access Foster Interd...

New study: " #OpenAccess increases both interdisciplinary and within-discipline citations in many fields and increases only interdisciplinary citations in chemistry, computer science, and clinical medicine."
https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.14653

#OACA #OpenAccessCitationAdvantage

Does Open Access Foster Interdisciplinary Citation? Decomposing Open Access Citation Advantage

The existence of an open access (OA) citation advantage, that is, whether OA increases citations, has been a topic of interest for many years. Although numerous previous studies have focused on whether OA increases citations, expectations for OA go beyond that. One such expectation is the promotion of knowledge transfer across various fields. This study aimed to clarify whether OA, especially gold OA, increases interdisciplinary citations in various natural science fields. Specifically, we measured the effect of OA on interdisciplinary and within-discipline citation counts by decomposing an existing metric of the OA citation advantage. The results revealed that OA increases both interdisciplinary and within-discipline citations in many fields and increases only interdisciplinary citations in chemistry, computer science, and clinical medicine. Among these fields, clinical medicine tends to obtain more interdisciplinary citations without being influenced by specific journals or papers. The findings indicate that OA fosters knowledge transfer to different fields, which extends our understanding of its effects.

arXiv.org

New study: Looking at its own articles published 2019-2013, the hybrid π˜‘π˜°π˜Άπ˜³π˜―π˜’π˜­ 𝘰𝘧 𝘊𝘳𝘒𝘯π˜ͺ𝘰𝘧𝘒𝘀π˜ͺ𝘒𝘭 𝘚𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘺 found that "OA articles had statistically significantly higher citation counts than TA [toll access] articles."
https://journals.lww.com/jcraniofacialsurgery/abstract/9900/do_open_access_articles_have_a_citation_advantage.2152.aspx

#OpenAccess #OpenAccessCitationAdvantage #OACA

New study: "We find that the early release of a publication as a #preprint correlates with a significant positive citation advantage of about 20.2% (Β±.7) on average. We also find that sharing #data in an online #repository correlates with a smaller yet still positive citation advantage of 4.3% (Β±.8) on average. However, we do not find a significant citation advantage for sharing #code."
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311493

#Citations #OACA #OpenAccessCitationAdvantage

An analysis of the effects of sharing research data, code, and preprints on citations

Calls to make scientific research more open have gained traction with a range of societal stakeholders. Open Science practices include but are not limited to the early sharing of results via preprints and openly sharing outputs such as data and code to make research more reproducible and extensible. Existing evidence shows that adopting Open Science practices has effects in several domains. In this study, we investigate whether adopting one or more Open Science practices leads to significantly higher citations for an associated publication, which is one form of academic impact. We use a novel dataset known as Open Science Indicators, produced by PLOS and DataSeer, which includes all PLOS publications from 2018 to 2023 as well as a comparison group sampled from the PMC Open Access Subset. In total, we analyze circa 122’000 publications. We calculate publication and author-level citation indicators and use a broad set of control variables to isolate the effect of Open Science Indicators on received citations. We show that Open Science practices are adopted to different degrees across scientific disciplines. We find that the early release of a publication as a preprint correlates with a significant positive citation advantage of about 20.2% (Β±.7) on average. We also find that sharing data in an online repository correlates with a smaller yet still positive citation advantage of 4.3% (Β±.8) on average. However, we do not find a significant citation advantage for sharing code. Further research is needed on additional or alternative measures of impact beyond citations. Our results are likely to be of interest to researchers, as well as publishers, research funders, and policymakers.

The #RoyalSociety has documented the #OpenAccessCitationAdvantage (#OACA) for articles published in its #hybrid journals.
https://royalsociety.org/blog/2024/09/royal-society-open-access-equity-year-1-in-numbers/

"Data from [our] journal articles published in 2022 shows that papers published #OpenAccess receive 100% more citations and 116% more downloads" than articles behind #paywalls.

Royal Society Open Access Equity - Year 1 in numbers | Royal Society

Royal Society looks back on the first year of their Open Access Equity scheme and talks to an author about their experiences.

New study: In the field of #ecology "#code is rarely published (only 6% of papers)…[But] there may be incentives to publish code: Publications that share code have tended to be low-impact initially, but accumulate citations faster…Studies that additionally meet other #OpenScience criteria, #OpenAccess publication, or #data sharing, have still higher citation rates."
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.70030

EDIT: I just added the link to the article. Sorry!

#OpenAccessCitationAdvantage #OACA
@openscience

New study: #APC-based #OpenAccess journal articles enjoy a citation advantage over #paywalled articles. But so do articles in no-fee OA #repositories.
https://www.lib.auburn.edu/whatsnew/2024/03/au-librarians-and-biologists-team-up-and-use-big-data-to-investigate-open-access-publishing-models/

PS: Save your money *and* reduce our reliance on APC-based revenue models.

#GoldOA #GreenOA #OpenAccessCitationAdvantage #OACA

Update. #Subscription #OBGYN journals that flip to #OpenAccess see an increase in citations. Those that charge #APCs also see a decline in submissions from the global #south.
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.15398

PS: These authors recognize that not all OA journals charge APCs (#DiamondOA). On the one hand, their data only show a decline in submissions from the south for APC-based OA journals. But their imprecise writing attributes it to OA as such.

#OpenAccessCitationAdvantage #OACA