While the US war should be ended by Congress, until that happens, perhaps some survivability improvements could reduce harm to sailors and save the lives of a lot of #Ukrainian civilians.
Hey #USNavy #logistics, #munitions, and #engineering types: if the #US resumed arms trade with #Ukraine, exchanging high-end ballistic and cruise missile interceptors for P1-SUN interceptors with #DOD subsidized mass manufacturing and a Ukrainian-designed charging, data link, and deployment magazine adapted to the dimensions of a #VLS cell, how many interceptors could fit in the cell, and how fast could they be launched?
(I'm guessing 250 – 300 interceptors per cell, deployable at a rate of up to a few interceptors per second per cell with a relatively simple and reliable mechanism.)
How do you think the costs would compare? (I'm guessing a loaded reusable magazine full of 250 interceptors would cost less than a single ESSM.) And the interception cost ratio? (I'm guessing 10:1 to 12:1 cost advantage for the defending Naval vessel, in place of a 60:1 to 133:1 cost disadvantage.) How many more #Shahed drones could be shot down at sea with these interceptors? (I'm guessing more with a single cell of P1-SUN interceptors than an all-cells load of exclusively ESSMs.) How do you think the manufacturing and resupply timeline would differ? (I'm guessing orders of magnitude shorter: from much slower than Shahed resupply, to much faster.)
I'm guessing other #NATO #Navy officers may deploy this first, but it's the #USA which really needs it urgently: like, ideally starting this week, unless Congress overrides Donald.
Hey #DFU: How quickly could you and your civilians at home and abroad design a simple, reliable, cost effective system to store, charge, and control interceptors in a US Naval VLC cell and rapidly launch them from within one? What price could you offer the US Navy at scale, if the US were to resume military aid and trade?






