#OpticalPhysics #Biophysics #Biochemistry #MedicalDiagnostics #Photonics #sflorg
https://www.sflorg.com/2026/03/phy03252601.html
๐ช๐ผ๐ฟ๐น๐ฑ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐๐ต๐ผ๐น๐ผ๐ด๐ ๐๐ฎ๐
๐ Did you know every life-saving diagnosis starts in a lab? This #InternationalPathologyDay (Nov 12), we celebrate the experts behind the scenesโpathologists and lab scientists who make accurate diagnosis and treatment possible!
๐ ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฑ: โ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐น๐ผ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐๐ต๐ผ๐น๐ผ๐ด๐ ๐ช๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒโ โ ๐ต๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐น๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ถ๐ฟ ๐๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐น ๐ฟ๐ผ๐น๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ต๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐๐ต๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐น๐ฑ๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ.
๐ช๐ต๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐:
โ
Early disease detection
โ
Precise treatment guidance
โ
Monitoring patient progress
โ
Protecting public health
โ
Driving medical breakthroughs
Letโs thank these healthcare heroes and inspire future generations!
๐ข Share your story or tag a lab professional whoโs made a difference.
#IPD2025 #PathologyMatters #HealthcareHeroes #MedicalDiagnostics #EarlyDetection #PrecisionMedicine #GlobalHealth #LabScience #FutureScientists #HealthAwareness
'Development of an Artificial Intelligence System for Distinguishing Malignant from Benign #SoftTissueTumors Using Contrast-Enhanced MR Images' - a Karger: #Oncology article on #ScienceOpen -
๐ https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=7f67a6c5-d186-4285-8e5f-2d56a6adfda0
#MedicalDiagnostics #MRI #AIinMedicine #Radiomics #DigitalHealth
<p xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" dir="auto" id="d2621084e267"> <b> <i>Introduction:</i> </b> The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into orthopedics has enhanced the diagnosis of various conditions; however, its use in diagnosing soft-tissue tumors remains limited owing to its complexity. This study aimed to develop and assess an AI-driven diagnostic support system for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based soft-tissue tumor diagnosis, potentially improving accuracy and aiding radiologists and orthopedic surgeons. <b> <i>Methods:</i> </b> An experienced orthopedic oncologist and radiologist annotated 720 images from 77 cases (41 benign and 36 malignant soft-tissue tumors). Eleven tumor subtypes were identified and classified into benign and malignant groups based on histological diagnosis. Utilizing the standard machine learning classifier pipeline, we examined and down-selected imaging protocols and their predominant radiomic features within the tumorโs three-dimensional region to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors. Among the scan protocols, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-suppressed images showed the most accurate classification based on radiomic features. We focused on the two-dimensional features from the largest tumor boundary surface and its neighboring slices, leveraging texture-based radiomic and deep convolutional neural network features from a pretrained VGG19 model. <b> <i>Results:</i> </b> The test data comprised 44 contrast-enhanced images (22 benign and 22 malignant soft-tissue tumors) containing six malignant and five benign subtypes distinct from the training data. We compared expert and nonexpert human performances against AI by assessing malignancy detection and the time required for classification. The AI model showed comparable accuracy (AUC 0.91) to that of radiologists (AUC 0.83) and orthopedic surgeons (AUC 0.73). Notably, the AI model processed data approximately 400 times faster than its human counterparts, showcasing its capacity to significantly boost diagnostic efficiency. <b> <i>Conclusion:</i> </b> We developed an AI-driven diagnostic support system for MRI-based soft-tissue tumor diagnosis. While additional refinement is necessary for clinical applications, our system has exhibited promising potential in differentiating between benign and malignant soft-tissue tumors based on MRI. </p><p xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" dir="auto" id="d2621084e296">MRI is invaluable for the qualitative diagnosis of soft-tissue tumors, but radiologists face challenges despite advancements in imaging technologies. This study aimed to develop and evaluate an AI-driven diagnostic support system for MRI-based soft-tissue tumor diagnosis. The study used 720 images from 77 cases. Using a standard machine learning classifier pipeline, we examined and down-selected imaging protocols and their predominant radiomic features within each tumorโs three-dimensional region to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors. Contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted images were identified as candidates for developing a machine learning model for malignancy classification. We focused on the two-dimensional features from the largest tumor boundary surface and its neighboring slices, leveraging texture-based radiomic and deep convolutional neural network features from a pretrained VGG19 model. A support vector machine classifier trained with contrast-enhanced images demonstrated the best performance in preliminary validation investigations. Validation was performed using test data comprising 44 contrast-enhanced images. The AI model exhibited comparable accuracy (AUC 0.91) to that of radiologists (AUC 0.83) and orthopedic surgeons (AUC 0.73). The AI model processed data approximately 400 times faster than its human counterparts, demonstrating its capacity to significantly enhance diagnostic efficiency. While additional refinement is necessary for clinical applications, our system has exhibited promising potential in differentiating between benign and malignant soft-tissue tumors based on MR images. </p>
A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance comparison between generative AI and physicians.

While generative artificial intelligence (AI) has shown potential in medical diagnostics, comprehensive evaluation of its diagnostic performance and comparison with physicians has not been extensively explored. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies validating generative AI models for diagnostic tasks published between June 2018 and June 2024. Analysis of 83 studies revealed an overall diagnostic accuracy of 52.1%. No significant performance difference was found between AI models and physicians overall (pโ=โ0.10) or non-expert physicians (pโ=โ0.93). However, AI models performed significantly worse than expert physicians (pโ=โ0.007). Several models demonstrated slightly higher performance compared to non-experts, although the differences were not significant. Generative AI demonstrates promising diagnostic capabilities with accuracy varying by model. Although it has not yet achieved expert-level reliability, these findings suggest potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and medical education when implemented with appropriate understanding of its limitations.
Researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Human Development, the Institute for Cognitive Sciences and Technologies (ISTC), and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology developed a collective intelligence approach to increase the accuracy of medical diagnoses. Their work was recently presented in the journal PNAS.
Researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Human Development, the Institute for Cognitive Sciences and Technologies (ISTC), and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology developed a collective intelligence approach to increase the accuracy of medical diagnoses. Their work was recently presented in the journal PNAS.