Italian News by RSSAdnkronos - ultimoratop: Scioperi, organizzatori Anteprima d'estate: "Disagi colpiscono artigiani"
(Adnkronos) - Gli inevitabili disagi logistici, in particolare nel settore dei trasporti, rischiano di incidere sull’afflusso di pubblico
The defense of Sempio insists: "The DNA in Chiara’s nails is not Andrea’s.”
AGI - The data regarding the attribution to Andrea Sempio of the DNA found on Chiara Poggi’s fingernails “must be considered a fragile, partial and non-individualizing element, not suitable for founding a scientifically robust accusatory conclusion.” This was written by geneticist Marina Baldi in a consultation filed yesterday on behalf of Andrea Sempio’s defense.
“The data appears technically weak because it would not be full and individual profiles, but mixed, incomplete and not fully consolidated profiles – she explains –. Furthermore, the Y-STR data (the Y chromosome, ed.) does not have an individualizing value comparable to a complete autosomal profile and must be interpreted with even greater caution in the presence of multiple contributions.”
Presence of a further male profile
The expert then highlights the “decisive significance” of the presence of a further, unidentified male Y profile on another finger of the victim. This circumstance “documents that the subungual material is not genetically unique and that only the component purportedly compatible with the suspect can be selected, ignoring the presence of other male contributions.”
Absence of proof of aggressive contact
In any case, and this is the other important element for the consultation, “this data does not prove that Sempio had an aggressive contact with the victim, nor that he was scratched during the homicidal action. Alternative hypotheses remain open, such as background DNA, secondary transfer, occasional transfer, contamination, manipulation of the evidence, or deposition not related to the event.”
In the interceptions “he simulated responses to be given to the prosecutors”
In his soliloquies, Andrea Sempio simulated interrogations by the prosecutors. This is the thesis of the defendant’s lawyers concerning the murder of Chiara Poggi in a memorandum filed yesterday in which they contest the reading of the Pavia Prosecutor’s office, which in those dialogues with himself had instead seen elements of admission. Sempio “frequently simulated objections that he believed could be made to him, he formulated them aloud and provided his hypothetical answers” reads the document.
On other occasions, the defense hypothesizes, he used “a polemical and certainly not confessional register; he proposed examples, or reproduced virtual dialogues and always prefixed the expression ‘type’; he reported a virtual dialogue as if he imagines it (often recalling to mind and reproducing as he hypothesizes the circulating hypotheses among podcast users), he systematically adopts direct speech and the present indicative, as in the soliloquy of May 12, 2025, where he reports the interrogation of Alberto Stasi using alternating first person – both for the fancifully hypothesized questions of the investigators, and for the virtual responses of Alberto Stasi; in the presence of readings of the facts or of adverse evidence (coming from journalists, YouTubers, podcasters, users), Sempio, after having read or memorized and produced them aloud, interjects them with personal, dry and hyperbolic comments, such as ‘bullshit’ (as in the soliloquies of May 14 and 12, 2025), as well as ‘it’s not true’, ‘false’, ‘everything is wrong’ in line with a polemical and certainly not confessional register.”
#Sempio #Chiara #Andrea #AndreaSempio #ChiaraPoggi’s #MarinaBaldi #AndreaSempio’s #ChiaraPoggi #AlbertoStasi #first #YouTubers
https://www.agi.it/cronaca/news/2026-05-26/sempio-consulente-dna-garlasco-37245889/
