📰 De Rensis indagato dopo la querela di Stefania Cappa, l’accusa per l’avvocato di Stasi assieme alle Iene e l’ex maresciallo su Garlasco
#️⃣ #ATTUALIT #AlbertoStasi #Carabinieri #DelittodiGarlasco #Diffamazione #LeIene #Lombardia #Milano #OpenOnline #TheLabSocial #News #Notizie #Italia
🔗 https://www.open.online/2026/06/01/garlasco-de-rensis-indagato-diffamazione-stefania-cappa-accuse/
Adnkronos - ultimoratop: Scioperi, organizzatori Anteprima d'estate: "Disagi colpiscono artigiani"
(Adnkronos) - Gli inevitabili disagi logistici, in particolare nel settore dei trasporti, rischiano di incidere sull’afflusso di pubblico
The defense of Sempio insists: "The DNA in Chiara’s nails is not Andrea’s.”
AGI - The data regarding the attribution to Andrea Sempio of the DNA found on Chiara Poggi’s fingernails “must be considered a fragile, partial and non-individualizing element, not suitable for founding a scientifically robust accusatory conclusion.” This was written by geneticist Marina Baldi in a consultation filed yesterday on behalf of Andrea Sempio’s defense.
“The data appears technically weak because it would not be full and individual profiles, but mixed, incomplete and not fully consolidated profiles – she explains –. Furthermore, the Y-STR data (the Y chromosome, ed.) does not have an individualizing value comparable to a complete autosomal profile and must be interpreted with even greater caution in the presence of multiple contributions.”
Presence of a further male profile
The expert then highlights the “decisive significance” of the presence of a further, unidentified male Y profile on another finger of the victim. This circumstance “documents that the subungual material is not genetically unique and that only the component purportedly compatible with the suspect can be selected, ignoring the presence of other male contributions.”
Absence of proof of aggressive contact
In any case, and this is the other important element for the consultation, “this data does not prove that Sempio had an aggressive contact with the victim, nor that he was scratched during the homicidal action. Alternative hypotheses remain open, such as background DNA, secondary transfer, occasional transfer, contamination, manipulation of the evidence, or deposition not related to the event.”
In the interceptions “he simulated responses to be given to the prosecutors”
In his soliloquies, Andrea Sempio simulated interrogations by the prosecutors. This is the thesis of the defendant’s lawyers concerning the murder of Chiara Poggi in a memorandum filed yesterday in which they contest the reading of the Pavia Prosecutor’s office, which in those dialogues with himself had instead seen elements of admission. Sempio “frequently simulated objections that he believed could be made to him, he formulated them aloud and provided his hypothetical answers” reads the document.
On other occasions, the defense hypothesizes, he used “a polemical and certainly not confessional register; he proposed examples, or reproduced virtual dialogues and always prefixed the expression ‘type’; he reported a virtual dialogue as if he imagines it (often recalling to mind and reproducing as he hypothesizes the circulating hypotheses among podcast users), he systematically adopts direct speech and the present indicative, as in the soliloquy of May 12, 2025, where he reports the interrogation of Alberto Stasi using alternating first person – both for the fancifully hypothesized questions of the investigators, and for the virtual responses of Alberto Stasi; in the presence of readings of the facts or of adverse evidence (coming from journalists, YouTubers, podcasters, users), Sempio, after having read or memorized and produced them aloud, interjects them with personal, dry and hyperbolic comments, such as ‘bullshit’ (as in the soliloquies of May 14 and 12, 2025), as well as ‘it’s not true’, ‘false’, ‘everything is wrong’ in line with a polemical and certainly not confessional register.”
#Sempio #Chiara #Andrea #AndreaSempio #ChiaraPoggi’s #MarinaBaldi #AndreaSempio’s #ChiaraPoggi #AlbertoStasi #first #YouTubers
https://www.agi.it/cronaca/news/2026-05-26/sempio-consulente-dna-garlasco-37245889/
Punto Informatico: Denunce ai Carabinieri con l’app IO, senza andare in caserma
Presto sarà possibile sporgere denunce tramite l'app IO senza andare in caserma: l'annuncio dal comandante generale dei Carabinieri.
The post Denunce ai Carabinieri con l’app IO, senza andare in caserma appeared first on Punto Informatico.
Garlasco – “I don’t make deals and I will speak again,” insists Massimo Lovati, the former lawyer for Sempio, on the “machination” of 2017.
“Part of the 2017 investigation was dumped into today’s proceedings, so there’s a certain continuity, they could be interdependent.” With these words, Massimo Lovati, former lawyer for Andrea Sempio, reiterated the claim of a supposed “conspiracy” behind the investigation that nine years earlier involved the 38-year-old in the Garlasco crime. Lovati spoke this morning upon entering the Milan Courthouse, where the pre-trial hearing of the case against him for defamation was held. The accusation stems from statements made on March 13, 2025, outside the Montebello Barracks in Milan, when he described the 2017 investigation into Sempio as “the result of a conspiracy orchestrated by the defense of the Giarda Studio.”
Accompanied by his lawyer, Fabrizio Gallo, the 73-year-old from Vigevano denied the possibility of alternative proceedings. “I don’t plea bargain, I don’t ask for a suspended sentence,” he stated, explaining that nothing would happen “nothing” during today’s hearing. However, another point drew attention: Lovati announced that “later” he might make further statements about the case that led to his trial. “I will speak about the 2017 conspiracy, that’s why I am here,” he told the reporters.
Lovati was investigated and subsequently indicted by the Milan Public Prosecutor Fabio De Pasquale following a complaint filed by the lawyers Enrico and Fabio Giarda, children of Professor Angelo Giarda, the historic lawyer for Alberto Stasi, who was definitively convicted for the murder of Chiara Poggi.
The indictment charges Lovati not only with the statements made outside the Command Legion Carabinieri Lombardia barracks, where Sempio had gone for DNA collection after the reopening of the investigation, but also with a long series of statements made to national television and broadcasts. According to the prosecution, Lovati allegedly told viewers of Tg1, Tg2, Tg3, SkyTG24, La7, Mediaset, Milano Pavia Tv, Fanpage, Antenna 3 and programs like Quarto Grado, Le Iene and Mattino Cinque that “the 2017 investigation” was “the result of a manipulation organized by the investigators of the defense studios of Stasi,” adding that Sempio’s DNA had been “clandestinely taken” in 2016.
Lovati’s statements come as the Garlasco case continues to reignite the debate between the defense teams involved in the new investigative phase. In an interview with Repubblica, Antonio De Rensis, defender of Alberto Stasi alongside lawyer Giada Boccellari, reiterated that the defense’s work will continue without hesitation. “No judicial action can slow me and my colleague Boccellari in trying to establish what we consider to be the truth: Alberto Stasi is innocent. Especially after reading the documents from Pavia,” the lawyer stated.
According to De Rensis, the new evidence in the investigation “further distances Alberto from the responsibilities established by the verdicts” and represents “an enormous, deeper and more complex job than I could have imagined.” The lawyer then harshly criticized certain reconstructions that emerged in the media debate surrounding the case. “I am dismayed to read and hear an investigated making suppositions of corruption about Napoleone and Civardi. And even more so certain of your colleagues giving the poor imbecile carabinieri. I believe it is more than legitimate to doubt these media,” he declared, adding: “From the moment I worked alongside Giada Boccellari, I imagined this would happen.” Finally, De Rensis commented on the complaint filed against him by Stefania Cappa, Chiara Poggi’s cousin. “I keep to myself what I think. Certainly, when she made her report public, I defended myself on TV with Milo Infante: I believe I have the right to do so,” he concluded.
The article Garlasco – “I don’t plea bargain and I will speak again” the ex-lawyer of Sempio, Massimo Lovati, insists on the “conspiracy” of 2017 originates from Il Fatto Quotidiano.
#MassimoLovati #Sempio #AndreaSempio #Garlasco #Lovati #theMilanCourthouse #Milan #theGiardaStudio #FabrizioGallo #Vigevano #FabioDePasquale #Enrico #FabioGiarda #AngeloGiarda #AlbertoStasi #ChiaraPoggi #Mediaset #MilanoPaviaTv #Fanpage #Antenna3 #QuartoGrado #LeIene #MattinoCinque #Stasi #Repubblica #AntonioDeRensis #GiadaBoccellari #Boccellari #Pavia #DeRensis #Alberto #Napoleone #Civardi #StefaniaCappa #ChiaraPoggi’s #MiloInfante #IlFattoQuotidiano
Primo piano ANSA - ANSA.it: Legale Alberto Stasi: 'Infangato da Stefania Cappa, nessuna paura nel difendermi'
'Quando assunsi la difesa mi offrì di fare il relatore a convegni del Coni, ne parlai col procuratore'
Legal Alberto Stasi: ‘Muddyed by Stefania Cappa, no fear in defending myself’
When I took over the defense, they offered me to be a conference speaker for the Italian National Olympic Committee, I spoke with the lawyer.
'Quando assunsi la difesa mi offrì di fare il relatore a convegni del Coni, ne parlai col procuratore, se avessi voluto speculare su questo l'avrei fatto prima, ora non ho alcuna paura di difendermi' (ANSA)
Il Tempo: Freccero-Travaglio, che rissa su Garlasco: "Da chi dovete imparare..."
Botte da orbi sul caso di Garlasco e in più in generale sulla giustizia nello studio di Lilli Gruber. A Otto e mezzo, il programma di La7, si fronteggiano infatti l'ospite fisso Marco Travaglio e Carlo Freccero. L'esperto di tv già direttore di Rai 2 la dice chiara: "Io non sono un giudice e non ho assolutamente competenze, per cui non so chi è colpevole oppure no. So solamente che c'è uno in galera innocente, cioè Alberto Stasi. A me questa cosa non piace".
Come noto il fidanzato di Chiara Poggi era stato condannato e poi assolto, al termine di un tortuoso iter giudiziario la Cassazione ha rovesciato le assoluzioni e confermato la condanna di Stasi. Freccero: "Poi la revisione è ammessa addirittura nel nostro ordinamento, se ci sono dei fatti nuovi...". Il direttore de Il Fatto non ci sta: "E chi l'ha detto che è innocente?".
Freccero a quel punto cita "i cento errori nell'inchiesta" elencati nelle scorse settimane da Umberto Brindani direttore di Oggi, e il lavoro di creator del web. "Allora, tu hai questa idea che la Cassazione ha sempre ragione. Su Internet c'è una community che ha lavorato sui documenti con una competenza e una precisione incredibili. Dovete davvero imparare a tenere presente Internet, anche tu, Marco, non solamente i giornaloni, perché ormai lo scenario è cambiato. Ci sono personaggi molto importanti che la televisione ha dovuto riprenderli, Bugalalla, Spinnato...". «
Travaglio respinge questa versione e irride i personaggi indicati da Freccero: "Hai citato una manica di cazzari che la metà basta. Sono una manica di cialtroni che inventano un sacco di balle". "C'è anche della gente competente, credimi. E io sono pronto a sostenere pubblicamente la competenza di queste persone", ribatte l'ex direttore di Rai2.
Freccero-Travaglio, arguing over Garlasco: "From whom do you learn..."
"Blind accusations about the Garlasco case and, more generally, about justice in Lilli Gruber’s studies. On Otto e mezzo, La7’s program, the fixed guest Marco Travaglio and Carlo Freccero face off. The TV expert, formerly director of Rai 2, is clear: “I am not a judge and I have absolutely no expertise, so I don’t know who is guilty or not. I only know that there is an innocent man in prison, namely Alberto Stasi. I don’t like this at all.”
As is known, Chiara Poggi’s boyfriend had been convicted and then acquitted, after a tortuous legal process the Court of Cassation overturned the acquittals and confirmed Stasi’s conviction. Freccero: “Then the revision is admitted even in our legal system, if there are new facts…” The editor of Il Fatto isn’t letting it go: “And who said he is innocent?”
Freccero then cites “the one hundred errors in the investigation” listed in the past few weeks by Umberto Brindani, editor of Oggi, and the work of web creators. “So, you have this idea that the Court of Cassation is always right. On the Internet there is a community that has worked on the documents with incredible competence and precision. You really have to learn to take the Internet into account, even you, Marco, not just the big newspapers, because the scenario has changed. There are very important people that television has had to take back, Bugalalla, Spinnato…”
Travaglio rejects this version and mocks the figures indicated by Freccero: “You’ve cited a bunch of idiots who the half is enough. They’re a bunch of fools who invent a lot of lies.” “There’s also competent people, believe me. And I am ready to publicly support the competence of these people,” the former director of Rai2 retorts.
#Freccero-Travaglio #Garlasco #LilliGruber’s #MarcoTravaglio #CarloFreccero #AlbertoStasi #ChiaraPoggi’s #theCourtofCassation #Stasi #Freccero #IlFatto #UmbertoBrindani #Marco #Bugalalla
RaiNews: Garlasco, le intercettazioni e gli elementi che incastrano Andrea Sempio
I soliloqui di Andrea Sempio registrati ad aprile 2025 nella sua auto: l’indagato per l’omicidio di Chiara Poggi parla da solo del video intimo della vittima con l'allora fidanzato Alberto Stasi
Garlasco, the wiretaps and the evidence that incriminate Andrea Sempio
Andrea Sempio’s monologues recorded in April 2025 in his car: the investigated for the murder of Chiara Poggi talks to himself about the intimate video of the victim with her then-boyfriend Alberto Stasi.
Today: Le bugie, il dna e gli audio: quali sono gli elementi dei pm contro Andrea Sempio
Secondo i pm della procura di Pavia, sarebbe stato Andrea Sempio a uccidere Chiara Poggi nella sua villetta di Garlasco, e non Alberto Stasi, l'ex fidanzato della vittima, già condannato a 16 anni di reclusione. La versione dell'accusa, che se confermata riscriverebbe la storia del delitto dopo...
Lies, DNA, and audio recordings: what are the elements of the prosecutor's case against Andrea Sempio
According to the Pavia prosecutor's office, it was Andrea Sempio who killed Chiara Poggi in her Garlasco villa, not Alberto Stasi, the victim’s ex-boyfriend, already sentenced to 16 years imprisonment. The prosecution’s version, if confirmed, would rewrite the story of the crime after...
#AndreaSempio #Pavia #ChiaraPoggi #AlbertoStasi
https://www.today.it/cronaca/omicidio-garlasco-elementi-pm-contro-sempio.html
Il Tempo: Garlasco, parlano le amiche di Chiara: chi andava in camera sua e la mail del "piccione"
Chiara Poggi aveva detto alle sue amiche che gli amici del fratello Marco entravano in camera sua per usare il suo computer. Circostanza che la seccava. Lo riporta Repubblica nell'ambito delle nuove indagini sul delitto di Garlasco. Il quotidiano riporta le testimonianze di alcune sue amiche secondo cui la ragazza era "molto innamorata" di Alberto Stasi e che "tra loro non c'erano particolari problemi".
Maristella Gabetta, ex vicina di casa di Chiara, ascoltata un anno fa dagli inquirenti che indagavano su Andrea Sempio alla domanda "conosceva qualche amico di Marco?" rispondeva: "Di persona no, sapevo di qualcuno che frequentasse la casa per giocare ai videogame con Marco, me ne parlava Chiara (...) si lamentava soprattutto che questi amici andassero anche in camera sua a giocare con il pc".
La donna dice che è una "cosa plausibile" che Chiara avesse dei video intimi suoi e di Alberto nel pc e smentisce che potesse aver interesse per qualche altro ragazzo, come poteva far pensare la famosa mail in cui parlava di un "piccione": "Mi sento di escludere che potesse riferirsi a qualcun altro perché era troppo innamorata di Alberto". Un'altra vicina di casa nega che ci sia stata una discussione il giorno prima del delitto tra Chiara e la cugina Stefania Cappa. Una ex collega definisce la vittima "molto gelosa" del fidanzato ed esclude la presenza di altri uomini, unica eccezione un collega con cui aveva preso appena un caffé come "piccola ripicca, un dispetto", tra innamorati.
Garlasco, the friends of Chiara speak: who went into her room and the email of the "dove" [informant].
Chiara Poggi had told her friends that Marco’s brother’s friends entered her room to use her computer. This circumstance irritated her. Repubblica reports this within the context of the new investigations into the Garlasco crime. The newspaper reports the testimonies of some of her friends, stating that the girl was “very much in love” with Alberto Stasi and that “there were no particular problems between them.”
Maristella Gabetta, Chiara’s former neighbor, who was questioned a year ago when investigators were looking into Andrea Sempio, in response to the question “Did you know any friends of Marco?” replied, “Not personally, I knew someone who frequented the house to play video games with Marco, Chiara told me about it (…) she especially complained that these friends also went into her room to play with the computer.”
The woman says it is a “plausible” thing that Chiara had intimate videos of herself and Alberto on the computer and denies that she could have been interested in any other boy, as the famous email in which she spoke of a “pigeon” might have suggested: “I feel I can exclude that it could refer to someone else because she was too in love with Alberto.” Another neighbor denies that there was an argument the day before the crime between Chiara and cousin Stefania Cappa. A former colleague describes the victim as “very jealous” of her boyfriend and excludes the presence of other men, with the exception of a colleague with whom she had just had a “small prank,” a bit of a “dispute,” between lovers.
#Garlasco #ChiaraPoggi #Marco #Repubblica #AlbertoStasi #MaristellaGabetta #Chiara #AndreaSempio #Alberto #StefaniaCappa
Il Tempo: Diffusi gli audio di Sempio: "Alle nove e mezza..." e il "video nella penna"
A focalizzare l'attenzione dell'opinione pubblica oggi sul caso di Garlasco sono gli audio dei soliloqui di Andrea Sempio, intercettato in auto. File dove le parole si confondono col rumore di fondo, e che vegono rilanciati dalle trasmissioni tv. A 4 di sera, su Rete 4, Paol Del Debbio ha mandato in onda l'audio di una intercettazione ambientale del 2017 che secondo la Procura di Pavia "sembra riferirsi all'orario in cui si sarebbe presentato a casa della vittima il giorno dell'omicidio" di Chiara Poggi. Nell'audio dell'8 febbraio 2017 il 38enne, viene ricostruito, affermerebbe: "È successo qualcosa quel giorno (...) era sempre lì a casa (...) però ca**o (...) alle nove e mezza". Secondo la Procura Sempio "sembra riferirsi all'orario" in cui è stata uccisa Chiara Poggi il 13 agosto 2007, quell'intercettazione è relativa a due giorni prima di essere interrogato per la prima volta come indagato nell'inchiesta del 2016-17.
Intercettazione che è stata riascoltata nel 2025 e riportata sia nell'informativa del Nucleo investigativo dei carabinieri che nella memoria che i pm hanno letto all'indagato la settimana scorsa, quando convocato dai magistrati si è avvalso della facoltà di non rispondere.
Garlasco, ecco l'audio del soliloquio di Sempio #4disera pic.twitter.com/27MhMPW8iE — 4 di sera (@4disera)
May 12, 2026
Un altro audio, mandato in onda da Dentro la notizia su Canale 5, per gli inquirenti si collega al movente sessuale. Nel dialogo tra sé e sé Sempio farebbe riferimento a video intimi di Chiara Poggi e Alberto Stasi, pronunciando la frase: “Il video ce l'ho nella penna”. La difesa dell'indagato sostiene che quelle frasi fossero commenti legati a podcast, programmi tv o ricostruzioni mediatiche sul caso.
#Garlasco, l'audio del soliloquio di Sempio: "Il video è nella penna".#DentrolaNotizia pic.twitter.com/msSiVPFv7s — Dentro la Notizia (@dentronotiziatv)
May 12, 2026
Sempio audio released: "At 9:30..." and the "video on the pen."
Today, the Garlasco case is drawing public attention due to the audio recordings of Andrea Sempio’s monologues, intercepted while in his car. Files where the words blend with background noise, and which are being broadcast by television transmissions. At 9 p.m., on Rete 4, Paolo Del Debbio aired the audio of an ambient interception from 2017 that, according to the Pavia Prosecutor’s Office, “appears to refer to the time he allegedly arrived at the victim’s house on the day of her murder, Chiara Poggi.” The audio from February 8, 2017, features the 38-year-old allegedly saying: “Something happened that day (…) he was always there at home (…) but I messed up (…) at 9:30.” According to the Prosecutor, Sempio “appears to refer to the time” in which Chiara Poggi was killed on August 13, 2007. This interception is related to two days before he was first questioned as a suspect in the 2016-17 investigation.
The interception was replayed in 2025 and reported in both the information from the Carabinieri investigative unit and in the recollection that the prosecutors read to the suspect last week, when summoned by the magistrates, he exercised his right to remain silent.
Garlasco, here's the audio of Sempio’s soliloquy #4disera pic.twitter.com/27MhMPW8iE — 4 di sera (@4disera)
May 12, 2026
Another audio, broadcast by Dentro la Notizia on Canale 5, links to the sexual motive for investigators. In the dialogue between himself and himself, Sempio makes reference to intimate videos of Chiara Poggi and Alberto Stasi, uttering the phrase: “I have the video on a USB drive.” The suspect’s defense argues that these phrases were comments related to podcasts, television programs, or media reconstructions of the case.
#Garlasco, the audio of Sempio’s soliloquy: "The video is on the pen."#DentrolaNotizia pic.twitter.com/msSiVPFv7s — Dentro la Notizia (@dentronotiziatv)
May 12, 2026
#Sempio #Garlasco #AndreaSempio’s #Rete4 #PaoloDelDebbio #ChiaraPoggi #first #Carabinieri #@4disera #DentrolaNotizia #AlbertoStasi #@dentronotiziatv
RaiNews: Caso Garlasco, la ricostruzione in 3D dell'omicidio: così Andrea Sempio "si è mosso nella casa"
I legali della famiglia Poggi: “Nessuna novità dirompente, non c'è spazio per concedere una revisione ad Alberto Stasi"
Garlasco case murder reconstruction in 3D: this is how Andrea Sempio “moved through the house.”
The Poggi family’s lawyers: “No disruptive developments, there’s no room to grant a review to Alberto Stasi.”
OpenOnline [bot]
Italian News by RSS
