《薩爾達傳說》減壓效果獲科學認證 搭配吉卜力動畫更有效改善心理健康
一項新科學研究證實,開放世界遊戲對人們的生活品質和情緒健康具有顯著積極影響。專注於遊戲研究的期刊《JMIR S […]
#遊戲情報 #科技新聞 #JMIR #Nintendo
https://unwire.hk/2025/09/24/zelda-mental-health-study/game-channel/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=zelda-mental-health-study
Does anyone know about the open/closed preprint review settings at #JMIR ?
I was thinking about doing a class activity reviewing this preprint but it's not as realistic/exciting if there is no pathway to offer feedback.
@JMIRPub

Incredibly honoured to have contributed to this research published in JMIR. In it, we make the case for medical futures studies which include increasingly important approaches in the digital health era.

🧪 #digitalhealth #futures #futuresstudies #research #academia #JMIR

www.jmir.org/2024/1/...
https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e57148/

Exploring the Need for Medical Futures Studies: Insights From a Scoping Review of Health Care Foresight

Background: The historical development and contemporary instances of futures studies, an interdisciplinary field that focuses on exploring and formulating alternative futures, exemplify the increasing significance of using futures methods in shaping the health care domain. Despite the wide array of these methodologies, there have been limited endeavors to employ them within the medical community thus far. Objective: We undertook the first scoping review to date about the application of futures methodologies and published foresight projects in health care. Methods: Through the use of the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) method, we identified 59 studies that were subsequently categorized into the following 5 distinct themes: national strategies (n=19), strategic health care foresight (n=15), health care policy and workforce dynamics (n=6), pandemic preparedness and response (n=7), and specialized medical domains (n=12). Results: Our scoping review revealed that the application of futures methods and foresight has been successfully demonstrated in a wide range of fields, including national strategies, policy formulation, global threat preparedness, and technological advancements. The results of our review indicate that a total of 8 futures methods have already been used in medicine and health care, while there are more than 50 futures methods available. It may underscore the notion that the field is unexploited. Furthermore, the absence of structured methodologies and principles for employing foresight and futures techniques in the health care domain warrants the creation of medical futures studies as a separate scientific subfield within the broad domains of health care, medicine, and life sciences. This subfield would focus on the analysis of emerging technological trends, the evaluation of policy implications, and the proactive anticipation and mitigation of potential challenges. Conclusions: Futures studies can significantly enhance medical science by addressing a crucial deficiency in the promotion of democratic participation, facilitating interdisciplinary dialogue, and shaping alternative futures. To further contribute to the development of a new research community in medical futures studies, it is recommended to establish a specialized scientific journal. Additionally, appointing dedicated futurists in decision-making and national strategy, and incorporating futures methods into the medical curriculum could be beneficial.

Journal of Medical Internet Research

"we review the scope and the role of preprint papers platforms in academia, we explore individual cases, #arXiv, #SSRN, #OSF Preprints, #HAL, #bioRxiv, #EconStor, #RePEc, #PhilArchive, Research Square, #viXra, Cryptology ePrint Archive, Preprints.org, #ChinaXiv, #medRxiv, #JMIR Preprints, #Authorea, #ChemRxiv, #engrXiv, e-LiS, #SciELO, #PsyArXiv, #F1000 Research, and #Zenodo,

...

2/

Nine publishers just expressed "full support" for the new White House #OSTP guidelines for federal agency #openaccess policies.
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/975032

"Our main message is simple: publishing in any journal published by this group already meets or exceeds the requirements outlined in the OSTP memo."

The signatory publishers are #Copernicus Publications, #eLife, #Frontiers, #JMIR Publications, #MDPI, Open Library of Humanities (#OLH), #PeerJ, #PLOS, and #Ubiquity Press.

Supporting the OSTP memorandum “Ensuring Free, Immediate, and Equitable Access to Federally Funded Research”

The undersigned Open Access scholarly publishers express our full support for Dr. Alondra Nelson’s United States Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) memorandum “Ensuring Free, Immediate, and Equitable Access to Federally Funded Research.”

EurekAlert!
Check out and #peerreview this interesting #JMIR #Preprint: Benefits and Challenges of Open-Source Health informatics Systems: A Systematic Search of Projects and Literature Review https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/18489 #peerreview #digitalhealth via @jmirpub
Benefits and Challenges of Open-Source Health informatics Systems: A Systematic Search of Projects and Literature Review

Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet