Is #F1000Research using #Eliza to reply to its emails in its open-peer-review #F1000 system?

2026-01-01 my email:

> Please find a *human* who can read this email and fix your faulty editorial pipeline. > Please see the full timeline of this editorial process: https://codeberg.org/boud/open_science_meta/src/branch/main/open_peer_review/F1000_git_report_CCBYSA

2026-01-08 F1000Research email:

> Thank you for mailing us. Could you please elaborate your sent email "Please
> find a *human* who can read this email and fix your faulty editorial pipeline."

#ElizaLives !

Cookie monster!

@brembs @felwert

Oh, that's good news. I feel more comfortable with #OJS than with #F1000.

That's the pyANI-plus https://github.com/pyani-plus/pyani-plus slides for #BOSC2025 uploaded to #F1000: https://f1000research.com/slides/14-721

DOI and listing in the channel may take a few days (a manual approval step): https://f1000research.com/collections/BOSC

GitHub - pyani-plus/pyani-plus: Development repo for pyani-plus (the next iteration of pyani)

Development repo for pyani-plus (the next iteration of pyani) - pyani-plus/pyani-plus

GitHub
A reminder that #BOSC2025 presenters are invited to share their slides/poster on #F1000 in the collection, making them discoverable and citeable with a DOI: https://f1000research.com/collections/BOSC
Articles from collection Bioinformatics Open Source Conference (BOSC) - F1000Research

Read the latest peer reviewed Bioinformatics Open Source Conference (BOSC) articles and more on F1000Research

Peter Suber (@[email protected]) (@petersuber) on X

1/ The EC awarded the contract to build Open Research Europe (#ORE) to @F1000 / @F1000Research. https://t.co/B91o4ALaQ4

X (formerly Twitter)

We've also been busy updating our #Publishers factsheet, co-authored by #F1000's own #KayBurrows, so pop along and take a look at the changes!

https://fairsharing.org/educational#publishers

@debsethorpe @allysonlister @lnanderscience @kylecopas @neuropelletier @msandstr @GenevievMichaud @stephenserjeant

FAIRsharing

@dasaptaerwin

#F1000Research is not going to get many reviewers for its #OpenPeerReview system if after two and a half months, a review of version 2 of a paper is still not published:

https://f1000research.com/articles/11-344/v2

Receipt of my second review was confirmed by email on 6 Feb 2023 ...

#F1000 had a nice idea, but currently it doesn't seem to be working.

#OpenScience

https://framapiaf.org/@boud/108669474100439567

F1000Research Article: Accounting for the expansion of the universe using an energy/momentum model to construct the space-time metric.

Read the latest article version by Hugh James, at F1000Research.

About Plastic Pollution in Terrestrial Systems | Collections | F1000Research

Read the latest peer reviewed Plastic Pollution in Terrestrial Systems articles and more on F1000Research

"we review the scope and the role of preprint papers platforms in academia, we explore individual cases, #arXiv, #SSRN, #OSF Preprints, #HAL, #bioRxiv, #EconStor, #RePEc, #PhilArchive, Research Square, #viXra, Cryptology ePrint Archive, Preprints.org, #ChinaXiv, #medRxiv, #JMIR Preprints, #Authorea, #ChemRxiv, #engrXiv, e-LiS, #SciELO, #PsyArXiv, #F1000 Research, and #Zenodo,

...

2/