#DigitaleSouveränität #EGovernment #ITPolicy https://www.heise.de/news/Muenchen-macht-digitale-Souveraenitaet-mit-eigenem-Score-messbar-11164082.html?wt_mc=nl.red.ct.ddigital.2026-02-10.link.link
For ikke så længe siden lovede Microsoft dette: https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2025/04/30/european-digital-commitments/
“And they include a promise to uphold Europe’s digital resilience regardless of geopolitical and trade volatility.”
Det holdte ikke længe: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/david-heinemeier-hansson-374b18221_trumps-sanctions-on-iccs-chief-prosecutor-activity-7330129953017004032-EAeh
“Microsoft, for example, cancelled Khan’s email address, forcing the prosecutor to move to Proton Mail, a Swiss email provider, ICC staffers said. “
#microsoft #trump #icc #EU #europe #itpol #itpolicy
🚨 OPSEC Disaster at the Top: How Michael Waltz Just Compromised U.S. National Security—AGAIN! 🤦🏻♂️ 🤬
While the Trump administration lectures about digital security, National Security Adviser Michael Waltz has been using Gmail to coordinate military operations and sharing after-action strike reports in Signal group chats that accidentally included a journalist.
Let’s be clear:
・Personal Gmail was used to discuss weapons systems & troop movements
・Israeli surveillance was exposed—jeopardizing a key intelligence partnership
・Sensitive coordination went through Signal, not JWICS
・Waltz, who attacked Hillary Clinton for email practices, is now guilty of worse
This is not a technical mistake. It’s a policy failure, a hypocritical breach, and a serious threat to U.S. operational integrity.
If you lead in national security, you do not get to bypass your own secure systems. And you certainly don’t blame “legacy contacts” when you get caught.
Accountability isn’t partisan. It’s essential.
#NationalSecurity #OPSEC #CyberSecurity #DigitalHypocrisy #InfoSec #ITPolicy #LeadershipFailure #MichaelWaltz
@nazokiyoubinbou I mean, I took the 0th Law of Robotics under consideration, but I don’t think any IT policy I could write would save humanity from AI, and by extension, save humanity from itself.
To quote Asimov’s perspective, “Yes, the Three Laws are the only way in which rational human beings can deal with robots—or with anything else. But when I say that, I always remember (sadly) that human beings are not always rational.”
#AI #GenAI #PredictiveAI #CyberSecurity #ITPolicy #Asimov #3Laws #AcceptableUse
Okay, I went ahead and did it. Asimov’s Laws of Robotics 1, 2, 3, and 4 are all mapped in one form or another into the AI AUP I’m writing.
Law 1: “A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.”
Converted into protecting the data of others.
Law 2: “A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.”
Converted into the guidance for sharing useful prompts to encourage more consistent (and beneficial) results.
Law 3: “A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.”
Converted into guidance about understanding the limitations of any AI tool in use so as not to risk misuse and potentially need to revoke access.
Law 4: “A robot must establish its identity as a robot in all cases.”
Converted into guidance that AI results shall be established as AI in all cases.
#AI #GenAI #PredictiveAI #CyberSecurity #ITPolicy #Asimov #3Laws #AcceptableUse
‚This week, #BAKS is organising the Deutsches Forum Sicherheitspolitik, or German forum Security Policy #DFS2023, and we are happy to partake in some events that talk about different dimensions of #CyberSecurity policy.
Tomorrow SNV's Julia Schütze will hold a background talk on 'How to boost cyber resilience of towns, communities, and cities', discussing how we can develop policies on a #federal level that increase the resilience of IT-systems on the local level.