Opposition to Death Penalty: UK Government’s Position

Government response to the petition

April 2026

The government has responded to the thousands who signed a petition concerning the Israeli government’s bill to enable the use of the death penalty against Palestinians with no chance of appeal. The response:

The UK opposes the death penalty in all circumstances. The Government has raised concerns with the Government of Israel and will continue to do so. The Death Penalty for Terrorists bill introduces a mandatory death sentence for terrorism-related murders, with no right of appeal. The powers would in practice apply almost exclusively to military courts trying Palestinians in the West Bank. 

The UK has expressed our deep concern about the bill, as it would significantly expand the possibilities to impose the death penalty in Israel. We have been clear, publicly and privately, that we oppose the death penalty in all circumstances. The death penalty has not been used in Israel for over 60 years, and this legislation risks being a regressive step enabling its use. Following its passage at second and third readings in the Knesset the bill is now law subject to legal challenge via Israel’s independent judicial system.

The Foreign Secretary spoke to the Israeli Foreign Minister and called for further plans to introduce this bill to be abandoned. On 29 March, the UK issued a joint statement with Foreign Ministers of Australia, Germany, France, Italy and New Zealand urging the Government of Israel to abandon plans for the death penalty bill. The statement can be found here: Joint statement on Israel’s Death Penalty Bill: 29 March 2026 –
GOV.UK (https://www.gov.uk/government/news/joint-statement-on-israels-death-penalty-bill-29-march-2026).

As set out in the statement, the UK and other signatories oppose the death penalty, reflecting a long-standing and shared commitment to abolition. The UK Government believes that the death penalty’s use undermines human dignity, that there is no conclusive evidence of its deterrent value, and that any miscarriage of justice leading to its imposition is irreversible and irreparable.

We particularly deplore any failure to observe the relevant international standards, defined by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.More broadly, the UK Government continues to call on the Government of Israel to uphold international law and human rights. This includes respecting the fundamental rights of detainees and prisoners, ensuring due process, and refraining from actions that risk further exacerbating tensions or inflaming an already fragile situation.

The UK continues to support international efforts to reduce violence, protect civilians, and promote respect for the rule of law. We firmly believe that lasting security for Israelis and Palestinians can only be achieved through progress on the Gaza ceasefire and the 20-point plan, an end to the annexation threats and settler violence in the West Bank, and a realistic political horizon for the two-state solution. We will continue to work closely with international partners, including the United Nations and civil society, to promote human rights, accountability, and oppose the death penalty worldwide. We will keep developments under close review and continue to raise our concerns where legislation or policy risks undermining international legal norms.

The Government is grateful to those who have engaged through the petitions process. Public engagement on issues of human rights helps inform and strengthen the UK’s foreign policy, and we remain committed to advancing these values internationally.

Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office 

Amnesty is opposed to the penalty in all circumstances and publishes a report on its use each month.

#DeathPenalty #FCDO #petition #UKGovernment

If you believe #KeirStarmer has a habit of throwing people under the bus to hide his own political moves & serve his personal ambitions, you're are right. I didn't need to hear #FCDO chief & #Whitehall stalwart #OllyRobbins give a painfully-measured-yet-damning testimony today to know #Starmer had backstabbed him in the #Mandelson vetting case, then lied to Parliament. This is the Independent article that showed me how much https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/starmer-mandelson-vetting-scandal-downing-street-whatsapp-b2961540.html

#EpsteinFiles

I knew that Peter Mandelson failed security vetting. So why didn’t Keir Starmer?

Political editor David Maddox looks back on The Independent’s exclusive in September last year and how he informed Downing Street of Mandelson’s vetting failure seven months before the prime minister claims he knew

The Independent
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2026/apr/21/olly-robbins-peter-mandelson-vetting-keir-starmer-uk-politics-latest-news-updates. "[The] #CabinetOffice suggested #Mandelson did not even need #security #vetting, #Robbins tells MPs... 'After the announcement, I believe the Cabinet Office (CO) raised whether Developed Vetting (DV) was actually necessary. I understand the #FCDO insisted that DV was a #requirement before Mandelson took up his post in #Washington.'" This all gets murkier, doesn't it? Talk about muddied waters!
Badenoch calls for Starmer to resign after sacked Foreign Office chief’s Mandelson evidence to MPs – live

Olly Robbins was sacked as Foreign Office permanent secretary over the Peter Mandelson security vetting revelations in the Guardian

the Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/apr/20/keir-starmer-admit-inadvertently-gave-mps-misleading-information-peter-mandelson. I "inadvertently admit" that I DON'T BELIEVE A F**KING WORD of it! #Starmer is a LIAR! Why Oliver Robbins chose to fall on his metaphorical sword, I don't know, I only know his motivation can't have been #financial, given his previous employment with Goldman Sachs. I also know the idea the Permanent Secretary at the #FCDO could overrule Mandelson's #security #vetting on his own initiative & in secret is utter BS! Starmer ought to RESIGN!

> But failing the developed #vetting process – a carefully made decision taken by professionals of deep experience – and then having that decision overturned is incredibly rare.
>
> I believe the idea that Robbins made such an unusual decision – to not tell his superiors that Mandelson’s vetting had failed – without consulting or at the very least informing relevant others, is completely implausible. That is why I suspect Robbins and the #FCDO may be being unfairly made the fall guys.
> ...
> What really boggles the mind about this whole scandal is the amount of political danger the prime minister and his erstwhile chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, were willing to risk in order to get #Mandelson into the US ambassador role.

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/mandelson-vetting-starmer-foreign-office-olly-robbins-resign-b2959652.html

I’m no Foreign Office fan, but Olly Robbins has been unfairly made a fall guy

I worked as a diplomat for a more than a decade – the suggestion that the Foreign Office failed to tell Downing Street that Peter Mandelson had failed security vetting is too fantastical to be the whole story, writes Ameer Kotecha

The Independent

Very interesting, @marjolica. Not quite a smoking gun, but close.

After having that put to him, a normal person would have sought renewed assurances from #UKSV, #M15, and the #FCDO. Either Starmer didn't make those inquiries, or he is lying now.

Starmer should face Commons inquiry over Mandelson vetting, says Ed Davey

Exclusive: Liberal Democrat leader calls for privileges committee to investigate whether PM misled parliament

The Guardian

#Mandelson failed vetting to be UK Ambassador, but the #ForeignOffice #FCDO overruled the decision. This was covered up.

So who lied?

Foreign Secretary David #Lammy?
Or PM Keir #Starmer?
Or both of them?

There's just no way a civil servant would hsve withheld this from ministers. It's just too big. Far far too big. Some minister knew.

Which of these large heads gets the chop?

My hunch is that Lammy will be the fall guy, but I'm not betting on it.

The UK gave £90,000 to an Israeli report seeking to prove that sexual violence by #Hamas on 7 October was “systematic”, a weakly evidenced claim #Israel made central to justifying its genocide in #Gaza.

The #ForeignOffice tried to hide how much, so Rivkah Brown spent 7 months getting the data out of them, with the help of the #InformationCommissioner's Office.

Not a single UK news outlet has picked up the story.
https://novaramedia.com/2026/03/02/uk-gave-90k-to-sexual-violence-report-central-to-israels-genocide-propaganda/
.
#NovaraMedia #ukpol #FCDO

UK Gave £90k to Sexual Violence Report Central to Israel’s Genocide Propaganda

Exclusive: The Foreign Office funded a sexual violence report subsequently used in a £33m Israeli campaign to whitewash its genocide in Gaza. Rivkah Brown reports.

Novara Media