Days since all PC Chairs declared conflict with the same paper in #EasyChair: 0. (Not me, I’m just a lowly PC-member ;-)
Premium-feature for #EasyChair: if you've forgotten the 2nd click when asking someone for a subreview, EC will send you an email after about an hour and remind you to complete the invitation šŸ˜•
I finally found a good use for #chatgpt in #research -> plug it to #easychair to automatically remove #toxic comments from reviews before they are sent to the authors
I always thought #Easychair was a misnomer, but hey, #Easyabs is even worse. Just reviewed loads of papers for #ICCG12 via Easyabs and I still don't have a six-pack šŸ˜ž
@shriramk @JanetSiegmund Yep, that's _one_ advantage of #EasyChair – it allows to store and manage a number of alternate email addresses for an account, all of which can be used in invitations. @JanetSiegmund: Maybe make this a #HotCRP feature request at https://github.com/kohler/hotcrp
GitHub - kohler/hotcrp: HotCRP conference review software

HotCRP conference review software. Contribute to kohler/hotcrp development by creating an account on GitHub.

GitHub

#easychair

No, this is not yet another rant about GitHub. Not even one about how you should have been scared before MicroSoft bought them.

Easychair isi a great service, that really streamlines running a conference. But it is a dominant player that I can't really avoid, and some of the terms of service are sketchy. 2.4 for example is the kind of thing that gave us the bitkeeper-vs-git saga. 9.4 is also blatently anti-competitive.