L'Unità: La Corte Suprema Usa annulla condanna a morte per “pregiudizio razziale” della giuria: esclusi i giurati afroamericani

C’era un “pregiudizio razziale” nella composizione della giuria che lo aveva condannato alla pena di morte. Così la Corte Suprema degli Stati Uniti ha annullato la sentenza nei confronti di Terry Pitchford, condannato per omicidio nel 2006 e poi destinato al braccio della morte da una giuria del Mississipi.
Pitchford venne accusato per una rapina finita nel sangue: fu il suo complice a sparare al proprietario di un negozio di alimentari, Reuben Britt, con una pistola calibro 22. Eppure Pitchford, che all’epoca aveva 18 anni, venne condannato alla pena di morte.
Vent’anni dopo quella decisione la Corte Suprema Usa ha stabilito, con un voto a maggioranza di 5 contro 4, che Pitchford non avrebbe potuto far valere pienamente le proprie obiezioni sull’esclusione di quattro potenziali giurati neri durante il processo.
Un ruolo chiave nella vicenda è dell’allora procuratore Doug Evans, accusato dai legali di Pitchford di aver usato criteri discriminatori per escludere cittadini neri dalla giuria popolare. Inizialmente la composizione era di 36 bianchi e 5 neri, un numero già abnorme considerato che la popolazione afroamericana rappresentava circa il 40 per cento degli abitanti della contea.
Non contento il procuratore Evans era riuscito a eliminare quattro dei cinque potenziali giurati neri. Dagli atti del tribunale era poi emerso come Evans avesse annotato la lista dei giurati segnando una “W” accanto ai nomi dei bianchi (come ‘White’) e una “B” (come ‘Black’) accanto ai nomi dei neri.
Il procuratore era già finito nel mirino della Corte Suprema statunitense per casi giudiziari da lui seguiti. Nel 2019 i giudici federali avevano già annullato la condanna di Curtis Flowers, altro uomo nero del Mississippi processato da Evans, stabilendo che il procuratore aveva ancora una volta tentato sistematicamente di escludere i neri dalla giuria.
La Corte Suprema 40 anni fa ,nella sentenza “Batson v. Kentucky“, aveva stabilito che i giurati non possono essere esclusi dal servizio in base alla razza e aveva creato un sistema per consentire ai giudici di valutare le accuse di discriminazione e le giustificazioni “neutre” fornite dai pubblici ministeri.

The Supreme Court has overturned the death sentence for “racial bias” of the jury: black jurors excluded

There was a “racial bias” in the jury’s composition that condemned him to the death penalty. Thus, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the verdict against Terry Pitchford, convicted of murder in 2006 and subsequently sentenced to death by a jury in Mississippi.

Pitchford was charged with a robbery that ended in bloodshed: his accomplice shot the owner of a grocery store, Reuben Britt, with a .22 caliber pistol. Nevertheless, Pitchford, who was 18 years old at the time, was sentenced to death.

Twenty years after that decision, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled, by a 5-4 majority vote, that Pitchford could not have fully asserted his objections to the exclusion of four potential black jurors during the trial.

A key role in the case is that of the then-prosecutor Doug Evans, accused by Pitchford’s lawyers of using discriminatory criteria to exclude black citizens from the jury pool. Initially, the composition was of 36 white and 5 black jurors, an already abnormal number considering that the African American population represented approximately 40 percent of the county’s inhabitants.

Unsatisfied, prosecutor Evans had managed to eliminate four of the five potential black jurors. Subsequently, from court records, it emerged that Evans had noted the jury list, marking a “W” next to the names of the whites (as ‘White’) and a “B” (as ‘Black’) next to the names of the blacks.

The prosecutor had already been the subject of criticism from the U.S. Supreme Court in judicial cases he had pursued. In 2019, federal judges had already overturned the conviction of Curtis Flowers, another black man from Mississippi prosecuted by Evans, establishing that the prosecutor had once again systematically attempted to exclude blacks from the jury.

The Supreme Court 40 years ago, in the ruling “Batson v. Kentucky,” established that jurors cannot be excluded from service based on race and created a system to allow judges to assess allegations of discrimination and “neutral” justifications provided by prosecutors.

#TheSupremeCourt #theUSSupremeCourt #TerryPitchford #Mississippi #Pitchford #ReubenBritt #theSupremeCourt #theUnitedStates #DougEvans #AfricanAmerican #Evans #CurtisFlowers #Batson #Kentucky

https://www.unita.it/2026/05/29/corte-suprema-usa-annulla-condanna-morte-pregiudizio-razziale-giuria/

#DougEvans made similar maneuvers during Pitchford’s trial, selecting a disproportionate number of #White #jurors compared with Black ones….By the time the judge had excused various potential jurors, the pool was composed of 36 White & 5 Black people.
Evans then used 7 peremptory challenges to strike 4 of the 5 #Black prospective jurors….He had marked up his juror list by placing a “W” next to the names of the White people & “B” next to the names of Black people, court records show.
#law #racism

In 2019, #SCOTUS reversed the conviction of another #Black #Mississippi man, Curtis Flowers, whom #DougEvans also prosecuted in a capital murder case. Flowers was tried 6 times. The justices found, 7-2, that Evans — now retired — had worked relentlessly to keep Black people off the #jury.

#law #racism #DeathRow #RacialBias #JurySelection

For two decades, Pitchford had argued his conviction was not valid, pointing to what he said were racially biased selections of the jurors who heard the case. Only one of the 12 jurors was #Black — in a county that was 40% African American, according to Pitchford’s filings. More troubling, Pitchford says, is that those jurors were selected by #DougEvans, a prosecutor with a history of maneuvering to keep Black people off juries.

#law #racism #SCOTUS #DeathRow #RacialBias #JurySelection