@yasper
Ich würde sogar fast sagen:
Eine Funktion
g : ℝ→ℝ
heißt linear,
wenn gilt:
∀λ,z∊ℝ: g(λz) = λg(z)
∀y,z∊ℝ: g(y+z) = g(y)+g(z)
cf.
https://x.com/i/grok/share/XjOvaIObC6yOxBY6UJcuzZgUU
aber ich weiss nicht, ob ein mathematischer Vielosauf wie
@larsweisbrod
so streng bei der reinen Mathematik bleiben kann,
d.h. ob ihm die für diese Definition benutzte Notation hinreichend geläufig ist.
#contextfree
In the given notation, a linear function \(g: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}\) (or more precisely, a function that is homogeneous of degree 1, which is the scalar multiplication aspect of linearity) would be defined by negating the existential quantifier and inequality from the original statement. Specifically: \[ \forall \lambda, z \in \mathbb{R}: \, g(\lambda z) = \lambda g(z) \] This means
I realisated recently that my art process is rather unusual: I start with the background.
Either a piece of #FluidArt (#AcrylicPouring) which I painted and scanned in, or a computer-generated fractal-like image. (Two sources for the computer generated images: #fractals from evolvotron, or images I generated using #ContextFree, a graphics design language.)
Then I play around! Which is why I often feel like my art is just doodling. Some pieces have more intent than others.
@sycramore
Dann mach halt.
https://cmucsd.bitbucket.io/bionicblinkenlights/index.html
The most effective pentesting hilft aber trotzdem dabei.
#entanglement
#contextfree
@larsweisbrod
It's complicated.
https://medium.com/@maradydd/the-scorpion-and-the-fox-c06e9deda76a
[2/2]
Christoph Maier
Kerr Avonsen
Tatzelbrumm
tatzelbrumm
Bloognoo