@paulknightly The general "choice" is to either cede to facial recognition attempts or other biometric ID, like fingerprints, or to get a far more thorough bag check & full body "pat down", with even the later "option" getting all the ID points taken anyways. This includes TSA, large concert security most commonly but also the department of social services & a growing # of medical clinic offices, among other entities.
My ears moving in response to my mood making facial recognition fail, because that movement changes a key measurement set it takes & uses. My extra elastic skin, from ehlers danlos syndrome hypermobility type, making finger prints/scanning fail & also making "pat downs" a painful ordeal, even when it's done gently.
Likely my being autistic, has me getting either harshly questioned whenever I question biometric ID in it working to people using scanners & their bosses, or any & all of my objections completely ignored - to the point where whenever I see a place has it that I'm considering going, I include with a plan to attend, a plan to leave before full entry, if my refusal attempts are ignored.
More than anything else though & as an overarching philosophical principle set of why I object to this set of technologies is my belief that for a new technology set to be worth adoption & expansion beyond small experiments, it must be to solve an existing problem for the majority of people using it, it must indeed solve said problem & that fix can't produce more &/or worse problems than the original problem.
AI& biometrics don't really solve any sizable problem for the masses, but they definitely cause more problems & thusly shouldn't be used on that basis alone.
#Ableism #DisabilityInaccessibility #AI #BiometricID