Xinkai Du

@xinkaidu
236 Followers
96 Following
26 Posts

PhD @UniOslo & Modum Bad Psychiatric Hospital | Prev ResMas @uva & BSc @UWaterloo | (Dynamical) Networks & Psychometrics; Psychopathology

SocialPsych > PsychMethods > Statistical Psychiatry
Weifang 🇨🇳 > Qingdao🇨🇳 > Waterloo🇨🇦 > Amsterdam🇳🇱 > Tübingen🇩🇪 > Oslo🇳🇴

想在世界找到自己的位置

#RStats #EMA #ExperienceSampling
#Psychometrics #Networks #SEM
#DynamicalSystems
#StatisticalLearning
#OpenScience #Replicability
#ClinicalPsychology #Psychopathology

Twitterhttps://twitter.com/XinkaiDu
Google Scholarhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=S6T6kY4AAAAJ&hl=en
Excited to share that this July I will be hosting a symposium on network psychometrics at IMPS, Prague, where I will present with @liu_thorsten, Ria Hoekstra, @bsiepe, Tatiana Kvetnaya, and Kai Nehler about our latest work! #RStats #EMA #ExperienceSampling #statistics #IMPS#Psychometrics #Networks #SEM #IRT#DynamicalSystems #MultivariateStatistics
Power analyses should not be based on the effect you expect but on the smallest effect size of interest. You commonly hear people say power analysis is not possible because you don't know the effect size. But this is a (common) misunderstanding of what you are suposed to do in a power analysis. You plan for the effect you do not want to miss - not for a guess of what it might be. See https://online.ucpress.edu/collabra/article/8/1/33267/120491/Sample-Size-Justification
Sample Size Justification

An important step when designing an empirical study is to justify the sample size that will be collected. The key aim of a sample size justification for such studies is to explain how the collected data is expected to provide valuable information given the inferential goals of the researcher. In this overview article six approaches are discussed to justify the sample size in a quantitative empirical study: 1) collecting data from (almost) the entire population, 2) choosing a sample size based on resource constraints, 3) performing an a-priori power analysis, 4) planning for a desired accuracy, 5) using heuristics, or 6) explicitly acknowledging the absence of a justification. An important question to consider when justifying sample sizes is which effect sizes are deemed interesting, and the extent to which the data that is collected informs inferences about these effect sizes. Depending on the sample size justification chosen, researchers could consider 1) what the smallest effect size of interest is, 2) which minimal effect size will be statistically significant, 3) which effect sizes they expect (and what they base these expectations on), 4) which effect sizes would be rejected based on a confidence interval around the effect size, 5) which ranges of effects a study has sufficient power to detect based on a sensitivity power analysis, and 6) which effect sizes are expected in a specific research area. Researchers can use the guidelines presented in this article, for example by using the interactive form in the accompanying online Shiny app, to improve their sample size justification, and hopefully, align the informational value of a study with their inferential goals.

University of California Press
Super happy to share that last week I started as Assistant Professor @NUSingapore, in the Department of Psychology! Very excited about the years ahead!

Working with intensive longitudinal data and interested in dynamic multilevel models/Dynamic SEM in Mplus? Check out these (free) DSEM demo videos on how to interpret the input and output by Ellen Hamaker:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dA3HvJZDzeo&list=PLet3DgvxBn2S7N2hVW4COAwH3_VaRoujd

#Dynamics #DynamicModeling #DSEM #Mplus #ESM

DDV01: N=1 input

YouTube
As we moved to a new platform, I thought it would be nice to share with you a lighting talk of the UseR Oslo group in which I introduced Meta-analytic structural equational Modelling (MASEM) and illustrated the steps to perform a MASEM analysis using the {metaSEM} R package. #metaanalysis #MASEM #Rstats https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyfIt2iNTu0&t=947s
Meta Analytic Structural Equational Modeling with {metaSEM}

YouTube

The Ideology 2.0 dataset (N > 280,000) is available. The data was collected on Project Implicit in the mid-2000s with a very diverse sample who were randomly assigned to complete semi-random subsets of individual difference, implicit, and explicit measures.
You can explore a small portion of the data to prepare Registered Reports. Upon acceptance, you will receive the confirmatory dataset.

The deadline for requesting the exploratory data is December 15, 2022.

Details: https://docs.google.com/document/d/12jmUlXguhFWjqMx2lHGrF8sFANbrJdaWhINfO-2DjMc/edit?fbclid=IwAR2O1GiOQ2NeDQZPKONj3ph9bQNehp_gCBq4FOK3xOj5QLa7wMdGda6O39U

Call for Registered Reports - Ideology Dataset

Registered Reports using a large, existing dataset of individual differences and implicit and explicit measures related to ideology Coordinating Team: Kathleen Schmidt, Charlie Ebersole, and Brian Nosek Deadline to request exploratory data: December 15, 2022 Deadline to submit Stage 1 Registere...

Google Docs
Power Analysis for the Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model Using the powRICLPM R-Package

The random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) is a popular model among psychologists for studying reciprocal effects in longitudinal panel data. Although various texts and software packag...

Taylor & Francis

Easy way to cross-post on Twitter and on Mastodon!

RT @[email protected]

@[email protected] Hi Hudson! Click on the following link, log in on twitter and mastodon (where the page tells you) and specify the permissions for crossposting!!!

https://crossposter.masto.donte.com.br/

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/RicardoRey_95/status/1594725490006310914

Mastodon Twitter Crossposter

Fedi-friends, I'm looking for inspiring papers that give formal descriptions of #developmental #systems to explain natural #phenomena. The scientific discipline is irrelevant. We hope that the papers guide us in our aim to apply #models of #network evolution in #psychology. #complexsystems

My course start today! I'm excited. It's called "Battling the curse of dimensionality", an applied statistical learning course with a focus on solving real-world high-dimensional data problems.

The materials are all open, you can have a look on the website: https://infomda2.nl

Battling the Curse of Dimensionality

Materials for Applied Data Science profile course INFOMDA2 Battling the curse of dimensionality.

INFOMDA2