I'm wondering if it's possible for other people to break through their own molds or self-perceptions that lead them to think they are unable to achieve more than the sum of their active lifestyles -- because of boss restrictions and economic constraints.
What's holding us back? Is it these geriatric Republican senators from the south who are doing their best to appease Donald J. Trump while making sure millions are screwed out of their _right_ to healthcare? <-- I'm calling it that and not looking back. We have arrived, further than what happened during the 1990s with HMO's.
I want to know, now. I really do. What else could it be that's wrong with American society besides only people taking off at 7:15 in the morning to go to work.
My pro-environment mission statement thought up as a question is this: Anyone want to tell me why doing that for around forty or so years could be a short term or medium term challenge for every other living thing on the planet while tens of millions do the same driving everyday in the USA on a planet with the finite resource called fossil fuels?
Some elements in working society will not rapidly change. Others could change more swiftly with AI continually making inroads. When I was younger, we had to some degree in several areas of the white collar world of technology administration, finance, and office work predicted more tasks only humans could do would become automated and that computers would eventually replace humans using the old ways of paper documents, filing cabinets, and paper ledgers. This has continued to happen.
What's happening now worldwide is certain jobs altogether are being rethought of in terms of scope and remade into... something a little different so that we lose less together on a collective basis. There is now a struggle between workers' rights, their inalienable right to exist and function as a person while at the same time thrive as an individual within the context of working in the job itself, and facing a business's own notion of efficiency or what /that business/ perceives through shareholder control to be generalized economic expediency. <-- This area is where I'm interested a little more all the time about what women, minorities, and foreigners are interested in changing about the American business landscape. The intersection of different cultures could still slow down the invasive pattern of white male egos or paternalism being prevalent in management so frequently in business (what others might call patriarchy I think of as advanced paternal thinking).
In American capitalism this has been a rough road. Many are not getting paid enough and corporations do not budge on their own positions at times which makes many situations frustrating for workers.
Is work their motivation? Or is it money? I was raised in a family that fit in with the American lifestyle during my childhood. My Dad had a few friends he could turn to for moral and spiritual support and he tried to get out with both me and my Mom.
The problem I found later was that the way in which I was treated by both my guardians was unevenly disproportionate to how I learned to finally get along with others -- first by being independent and the second was doing things that I liked when I was able to.
In my toot I've attached a graphic where I asked AI to compare paternalism and patriarchy. This is where I feel that ChatGPT is, in some way, hallucinating on just identifying exactly what the differences are between patriarchy and paternalism and why that's the way ChatGPT is reporting those definitions in this manner. There are both differences and similarities between paternal instincts in men and the definition of patriarchy, yes -- which maybe should be thought of as going hand-in-hand more often lately, than to a lesser extent.