How many professional programmers are working on pointless and/or actively harmful products?

Give me your best guess.

(If you vote, please boost to diversify the results. It’s polite.)

US HUPO : Bridging ‘Omics to Function | 9-13 Mar, 2024 | Portland, USA --- https://www.ushupoconference.org/#Home-Top

---
#proteomics #prot-conf

Is this the way open science is performed nowadays?

Ten days before official publication of MASST+ in @naturebiotech but presumably after acceptance, all relevant source code was removed from its GitHub repository. It is now a shell repo that only includes a README and data files used for testing. Also no deposition of the code to @zenodo_org, so what's to prevent this history from disappearing as well?

Rather shocking.

Paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-023-01985-4
Repository: https://github.com/mohimanilab/MASSTplus

Weights for the non-enzymatic version of Casanovo v4.x are now available. Use this to analyze data that was generated using a different protease than trypsin, for immunopeptidomics, ...

You can find the model weights on GitHub under the "Assets" of release v4.0.0: https://github.com/Noble-Lab/casanovo/releases/tag/v4.0.0

Note that by default Casanovo will automatically download the tryptic model weights. To use the non-enzymatic model, download the weights file manually and specify it using the `--model` command-line argument.

Anyone out there that has time and skills to help me with designing a sticker for the rpx #rstats #bioconductor   package

http://lgatto.github.io/rpx/

It could be based/adapted from @wfondrie 's python ppx package (https://ppx.readthedocs.io/en/stable/) - both packages offer similar functionalities.

Do you wear a watch?

Please boost to make the sample larger.