@ai6yr Yeah I've had Copilot give me my own Rust code for Windows exploits.

@bob_zim @fhekland @cwebber

@mttaggart @fhekland @cwebber This is accurate, yes. Illicitly acquired code works the same way: you don’t hold the copyright, so you don’t have the ability to license it to others.

There is an open question of what happens when the LLM emits a verbatim chunk of code against that code’s license terms. For example, if you told an LLM to implement ZFS’ spa_activate, it’s extremely likely to emit verbatim chunks of CDDL code without the attribution required by the license. A tool can’t be liable for the infringement, but does the liability rest with the company which included CDDL code in the training corpus, or does it rest with the user who didn’t verify that the output doesn’t infringe preexisting copyright?

from @sushee over here, (can't attach images in quotes) and apparently discussed on HN so i'm late, but...

They REALLY ARE using REGEX to detect if a prompt is negative emotion. dogs you are LITERALLY RIDING ON A LANGUAGE MODEL what are you even DOING

I really appreciate all the replies and support on this one. It was hard to write. I do want to call out two points that aren't being discussed, and that I felt pretty strongly about: