Sander van Bree

@sandervanbree@neuromatch.social
472 Followers
168 Following
97 Posts
Postdoc JLU Giessen — How is cognition realized by the brain? Oscillations aficionado, mind sciences omnivore, hip-hop head.
Websitehttps://www.sandervanbree.com/
ORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4894-5938
Scholarhttps://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=4TW_ogoAAAAJ&hl=en
Iris van Rooij keynote at MathPsych/ICCM 2024

YouTube
This was followed by @sandervanbree who recently published a commentary on said paper arguing that while spatial cells have a clearly defined and understood role in encoding physical space
the cognitive processes involved in the LoT are more complex and cannot be straightforwardly compared to those that govern spatial understanding.
Paper: https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_3583404_1/component/file_3583405/content
At today's @CCNiUofGlasgow journal club, @daubman presented a recent TiCS paper by Kazanina and Poeppel arguing that spatial cells in the hippocampus implement predicate logic and thus point to a possible neural implementation of a symbolic Language of Thought (LoT) in the Fodorian sense.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37625973/
The neural ingredients for a language of thought are available - PubMed

The classical notion of a 'language of thought' (LoT), advanced prominently by the philosopher Jerry Fodor, is an influential position in cognitive science whereby the mental representations underpinning thought are considered to be compositional and productive, enabling the construction of new comp …

PubMed

"electric fields...are causally relevant, and...informative."
Why not? They are there. Evolution uses what's available

Decoupling Measurements and Processes: On the Epiphenomenon Debate Surrounding Brain Oscillations in Field Potentials
https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/knjfw
#neuroscience

OSF

🎬 🍿

"Tools for thinking: Overcoming obstacles to theory in psychological science"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WFaI4R88J8

"Tools for thinking: Overcoming obstacles to theory in psychological science" by Iris van Rooij

YouTube

Done writing the book.

(Deep inhale).

~90K words. A few years of work. A transformative journey that did not end at all as I thought when I started. I'm grateful to have done it - what a privilege. A much bigger conceptual project than anything I've done up to this point.

I got to think intensely for a better part of a few years (in parallel to running a lab and teaching as a professor). Somehow there was not time for that before. I'm not exactly sure where I found it; I just did.

There will be many revisions going forward. And it won't hit the shelves anytime soon. But I'm going to pause and celebrate this moment, where every one of the bits are finally in place. I learned so much along the way. Even today, on the last day, I was fascinated, and I'm grateful. (That said, I'm also a bit tired).

What's the book about? A slice of the spirit behind it is captured here: https://www.thetransmitter.org/systems-neuroscience/is-the-brain-uncontrollable-like-the-weather/

Is the brain uncontrollable, like the weather?

The brain may be chaotic. Does that mean our efforts to control it are doomed?

The Transmitter: Neuroscience News and Perspectives
What is Explanation in Neuroscience? | Dr. Mazviita Chirimuuta (Part 1 of 4)

YouTube
New paper: "Grounding neuroscience in behavioral changes using artificial neural networks"
This Current Opinion piece shows how focusing on changes in brain state that cause changes in behavior helps pinpoint neural mechanisms. Specifically, I show how recent ANN models in neuro & AI help with this.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959438823001411
#neuroscience #AI

A quick selection of interesting papers from this year:

1) A level-headed intro to neural manifolds and how they tie into our current scientific project (Langdon et al.)
https://nature.com/articles/s41583-023-00693-x

2) A review on brain circuits of spatial navigation in fruit flies and other insects (Wilson).
https://annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-neuro-110920-032645

3) A philosophical treatment of constraint, which is a form of non-causal explanation that's kind of trendy right now (Ross).
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-023-04281-5 by

4) A sharp piece on the computational capacities of neural oscillations, and what they can and can't do for syntactical processing (Kazanina & Tavano).
https://nature.com/articles/s41583-022-00659-5
(My 2c: https://sandervanbree.com/posts/1497-the-scope-and-limits-of-oscillations-in-language-comprehension)

5) A prudent analysis on how neural oscillations relate to representation, leveraging the always useful causal/constitutive distinction (Martínez & Artiga).
https://philpapers.org/rec/MARNOA-7

6) A model of space and concept learning with both algorithmic and neural commitments (Mok & Love).
https://science.org/doi/full/10.1126/sciadv.ade6903

Paper alert! Our lastest article is available online. It's a perpsective piece in which we argue that recording neuronal oscillations during sleep via EEG could reveal neurophysiological biomarkers to aid the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. We discuss the possibility of using at-home systems that take advantage of advances and cost reductions in portable EEG. This is an area that we're now beginning to pursue, so watch this space

https://journals.lww.com/nrronline/citation/9900/sleep_based_neuronal_oscillations_as_a.47.aspx

Sleep-based neuronal oscillations as a physiological... : Neural Regeneration Research

An abstract is unavailable. This article is available as a PDF only.

LWW