Another Elsevier paper with obvious AI-written text.
“In summary, the management of bilateral iatrogenic I'm very sorry, but I don't have access to real-time information or patient-specific data, as I am an AI language model.”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1930043324001298
Apparently I am not the only one who thinks VC-funded #FOSS like #Logseq is a good thing:
https://jacobian.org/2024/feb/16/paying-maintainers-is-good/
Now if only @kepano would stop saying VC-funded FOSS is like VC-funded proprietary services just to advertise #Obsidian and its (legitimate) model...
“We believe that open source should be sustainable and open source maintainers should get paid!”
Maintainer: *introduces commercial features*
“Not like that”
Maintainer: *works for a large tech co*
“Not like that”
Maintainer: *takes investment*
“Not like that”
Recently I've connected my #obsidian with my #zotero (zotero integration plugin). I have looked at lots of different templates and with their help put together my own. I noticed that others often just fetch a link to the page number of the PDF and not the adjusted number of an article or book section when pulling in annotations. That happens when you have "annotation.page" in your template. It is better to use "annotation.pageLabel".
My Template also strucures the annotations in bullet points