(no)
| Magic | Cards, coins, and other close-up stuff |
| Sysadmin | Linux, BSD |
| Japan | Economics , Politics |
| RPG | Shadowrun, DnD, FITD, WoD, Apocalypse Engine, Cyberpunk |
| Magic | Cards, coins, and other close-up stuff |
| Sysadmin | Linux, BSD |
| Japan | Economics , Politics |
| RPG | Shadowrun, DnD, FITD, WoD, Apocalypse Engine, Cyberpunk |
Hallo
Ich suche fuer einen Freund dringend eine neue Stelle im Bereich IT Linux/Devops Administration/Enginnering oder als Product Owner im Bereich IT Infrastruktur/Devops, hauptsaechlich im Raum Hamburg oder Berlin, Umzug ist aber in andere Bereiche Deutschlands moeglich.
#fedihire #fedijobs #techCareers
Danke an alle

There's a "Wayland set the Linux desktop back" blog going around now and ... it just makes me so tired.
That take is so amazingly wrong, but so persistent and popular. It is the "immigrants took mah job!" of takes for software. It is so flawed in so many different ways, and utterly ignores the host of actual reasons that Linux has stalled on the desktop.
It is apparently seductive, too, because it offloads the blame entirely on the crew developing Wayland without the person casting the blame considering for even a second the actual complexity of the problems. I could literally write a book on the reasons that the Linux desktop hasn't caught on; and I would, too, if I thought people would actually buy it and read it (a lot of people, I mean - enough to justify writing a book...)
But it boils down to this: Linux desktop development doesn't have more than a tiny, tiny fraction of the funding per year that Microsoft or Apple spend on marketing a single product line. Much less the kind of funds that go into R&D.
Vendors, mostly, are disinterested in supporting an OS that has less than 10% market share. At times they have even been actively dissuaded from doing so by certain other companies...
Users are, by and large, not willing to deal with inconvenience or having to learn new things in order to adopt the Linux desktop, even though the two main vendors are constantly making the user experience worse and continually taking away control of our own devices.
Wayland? It's a convenient scapegoat.
I'm not, by the way, arguing that Wayland is perfect, or that the community behind it has executed everything perfectly. And I'm certainly not arguing that people haven't had bad experiences with Wayland; that hasn't been _my_ experience, but I also have been using Linux for 30 years now -- and I choose hardware based on its Linux compatibility. I also have different expectations from a desktop than someone who has used Windows or macOS most of their life.
OK. Rant over. Be nicer to the Wayland folks. Stop blaming them for everything. In fact, let's maybe consider that what would really be useful is constructive takes on how we can succeed from here.
Bruce Lee had to wait for decades. But now there is a new challenger!
RIP Chuck Norris
Apparently Death learned how to do a roundhouse kick.
Es ist schon so weit … 😳 #dieKaenguruRebellion
https://marcuwekling.reimkultur-shop.de/products/die-kaenguru-rebellion
Hi #fediverse. We need to talk about something.
While talking to a colleague about how I recently learned most people have never sat on a cow it came up that she has never sat on a horse. Like, not even once during childhood.
Another colleague admitted they also have never sat on a horse.
My hypothesis is that most people have at one point in their life sat on a horse.
🏇 🐎 🐴
Have you sat on a horse?
Please boost for scientific accuracy.