jo

@jo@infosec.exchange
76 Followers
332 Following
646 Posts

infosec acolyte and unix enthusiast
suspected cat kisser
👩‍💻🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️ she/her
💍👩‍❤️‍💋‍👩
   

opinions are my own and are not written by "abominable intelligence", nor do they reflect the opinions of my employer.

My career so far:
🪟 Windows Developer (read: window factory worker)
 IT/sysadmin
📦 Containerization Expert
🏛️ .gov (thanks a lot, EO 14168)
🖤 The Darkness

I don't really like this instance but honestly I lack the energy to migrate.

JoinedNov 4, 2022
GenderFemale
Y2K CompliantTrue
@admirallazuli bigots only being bigoted ooc honestly sounds worse to me. "I'll play nicely, but I'm actually a turbo racist irl" is less than ideal
@candyether.space introducing the medibot to my good friend, the emag

@vfrmedia @ned A McDonald's by me closed, and Google Maps kept it as open for over a year, despite me reporting it as closed. So they just kinda suck sometimes.

Getting these places on OSM would be great, as they're presumably not as easily swayed by current shitshow going on.

on that spooky frightset fr fr
@Reborn_Cat_Mom Even with Executive Order 14168, you still have a right to be patted down by someone of the same gender (but don't say gender to them, since they're trained to ignore that word, say 'sex')
@mattsheffield You're spreading misinformation, drag queens and transgender people should both be 0.
🤦‍♂️
@shodansafari huh, curious what they're doing
ea nasir is back baby awooo
shel silverstein on the LLM, 1981
×
🤦‍♂️

@tomwarren.co.uk

At least he didn't tell her to do her own research 

@tomwarren.co.uk I wish signal would make a proper app for Linux Mobile.
@tomwarren.co.uk Who needs artificial stupidity when you've got the real thing in ample supply?

@tomwarren.co.uk Omg. This is another instant classic.

Also, I love @Mer__edith . She's the best.

@tomwarren.co.uk huge "look it up baby" vibe 😄

@tomwarren.co.uk

Well... there is always this one guy 🙂

Ahhh still haven't decided about continuing study this semester. Do I want to drop two grand on sitting through someone reading a powerpoint and telling war stories while teaching myself the tools to create a fake incident report on a technology that was deprecated several years ago? Added bonus, an exam with ai-generated quiz that repeats half its questions on the same 5% of content. Also good luck figuring out what's actually in the exam.

to be fair, some subjects have been better taught than others, and there's the occasional interesting assignment, but unfortunately it's been far from consistent. Staff need more training in learning design and teaching, and need more resources and hours to do their jobs effectively.

The exam experience has been uniformly atrocious, certainly compared to my experience of exams for my psychology degree, which were well designed and for which I was well prepared. Ironically I suspect a lot of the learning design support that is offered in ITC is not useful because the learning designers don't understand the topics adequately. Though generally there's such a lot of bad learning design out there, especially in the digital space... god don't get me started on that...

@tomwarren.co.uk

Impressive how he also manages to include typing, punctuation, and vocabulary errors in his posts, in addition to the factual error and industry ignorance!

MythBusters - I Reject Your Reality and Substitute My Own (w/ context)

YouTube
@tomwarren.co.uk So that does make me muse 🤔 , how does one suppress mansplaining in an AI training corpus
@tomwarren.co.uk Like what even... He just declares these things as if he has inside information and... he doesn't....
@tomwarren.co.uk @joelle this is so embarrassing I feel like turning inside out. I looked up the original thread and it just keeps getting worse and worse, the ratios are off the charts. And this guy has 60k+ followers? For… what?
@glyph @tomwarren.co.uk @joelle no one is going to ask bill much of anything after this
@cthon1c @tomwarren.co.uk @joelle I wish I could believe that, he does not appear to have lost many
@glyph @tomwarren.co.uk @joelle I didnt realize I could buy 60K Bsky bot followers on Fiverr.
@tomwarren.co.uk
Wow. Kind of wish she had just kept answering “No” with an increasing number of hearts as his rant went on.
@tomwarren.co.uk @saraislet Bill should go under a rock for a while and think about what he has done.
@tomwarren.co.uk
I wouldn't discount it out of hand. I saw, in a big engineering company I worked for, where an unprincipled executive had lower level people put systems in place before he toppled the rather principled CEO. It happens because being unprincipled allows you to make a bigger profit.
@tomwarren.co.uk
On the other hand seeing as how he continued his theory as shown in another post he's just another troll.
@tomwarren.co.uk it's funny cause it's like she is actually standing there with that smile in her face replying that man

@tomwarren.co.uk

I'd have given anything to see her reaction to all this in person. I'm sure she's way above getting annoyed at this sort of crap by now and was probably cracking the fuck up.

I really wonder if this guy had the slightest bit of self-reflection afterward. (Kinda doubt it.)

@tomwarren.co.uk The boss is always the last to find out, right?

@tomwarren.co.uk

The perfect poster for mansplaining?

Had Signal been indexed by Windows Recall, one might stretch definition of "integration" if only seeking to score a point. Alas, Signal Foundation researched, discovered and publicized a method to avoid messages being read by a platform level LLM.
@tomwarren.co.uk Not sure how this is "mansplaining" other than the fact that a man is trying to explain something. He had a opinion, mistaken though it was. He wasn't patronizing, at least in the snippet of conversation shown here. Was he supposed to assume that an anonymous person saying "no" to him was the company CEO?
@michaelvcooper1 @tomwarren.co.uk What do you mean, "an anonymous person"? The name is right there: Meredith Whittaker.

@barubary @tomwarren.co.uk Did you know the name of the CEO of Signal, before this exchange went viral? Do you look up the credentials of every person you answer on social media?

I've had many debates with strangers on social media over the years. Sometimes I've even been wrong. But it has never occurred to me that the person I'm speaking to might be a high-level executive with insider information. So I don't blame this guy for not considering that.

@michaelvcooper1 @tomwarren.co.uk

Did you know the name of the CEO of Signal, before this exchange went viral?

Not actively, but the name looked familiar, so I would've taken a second to look at their profile before replying.

Do you look up the credentials of every person you answer on social media?

Why was an answer necessary in this case?

Particularly this answer, which implied familiarity with or insider knowledge of Signal's business strategy ("... likely be timing up with Anthropic's Claude or Perplexity ...") and technical foundations ("... engineers have already began laying out the ground work ..."). Keep in mind, all this was stated as definite fact, not an opinion, speculation or rumor ("They will ... its coming").

And then that same dude doesn't even recognize the name of the person who has been the president of Signal and sitting on its board of directors since 2022.

So what exactly qualifies him to "explain" anything about Signal?

@barubary @tomwarren.co.uk Come on. You need "qualifications" to express an opinion on the internet now? My guess (only a guess) is that this guy was repeating an internet rumor. That makes him gullible perhaps, but nothing more.

Do you know what would have cleared the air instantly? If Ms. Whittaker had simply replied "Hello, this is Meredith Whittaker, CEO of Signal. I'm not sure where you got this information, but I can assure you that there is no truth to it." Not hard.

@michaelvcooper1

I feel like you're twisting words to suit your argument, so I'd like to clarify a few things.

As far as I'm concerned, there is a difference between explaining something and expressing an opinion on something. (But in either case you should be at least passingly familiar with the topic at hand if you want to be taken seriously. There's your "qualifications".) You're seamlessly switching between calling it a man just trying to explain something, an online debate, and someone expressing an opinion. Those are not the same thing.

Explaining things at people (particularly things you know nothing about and your audience does) is patronizing in and of itself.

No one was anonymous.

Whittaker is not the CEO of Signal. (That would be Brian Acton, I believe.)

Why is it that you expect Whittaker to announce her qualifications just to reject something that has been asserted without any justification? Why isn't the onus on Mitchell to provide any evidence for his claims? (Or at least to check her profile to see who he's lecturing. In your words: Not hard.) Those were rhetorical questions; I don't expect an answer. Bye.

@barubary I feel that in the context of a casual internet conversation, the differences between "expressing an opinion", "explaining something" and "an online debate" amount to semantic frivolity. Attempting to make an issue out of my word choices is a distraction.

Not saying Mitchell was right. He wasn't. I'm only saying he is not a mansplaining mysogynist simply for being wrong, while in a conversation in which a woman was right.

Bye.

@michaelvcooper1 @tomwarren.co.uk It was not an opinion. It was a fact, and a false one, stated with the arrogance and confidence that is typical of people raised as male.
@tomwarren.co.uk Later replies from this clown are also great.
Mansplaining as a service
@tomwarren.co.uk 😂 how you destroy your trustworthiness in just two posts.
A BlueSky thread by Meredith Whittaker on Skyview

Use Signal. We promise, no AI clutter, and no surveillance ads, whatever the rest of the industry does. <3