Sometimes these pieces seem to land on a model of human sociality that is fundamentally about unconscious impulses driving us into irrational behavior. That's old school and contradicted by more sophisticated social cognition work.

Explanations are incomplete when they don't push us to think, what are groups and environment*person interactions that DO create the conditions for meaningful dissent? Why do they happen in some places and not others? Your answer can't just be "people are bad"

Also a useful question when folks come to me and say, "we want to change our engineering org's culture" is: "and how will we know the culture has changed....?"

For me, assuming you can actually observe it in a safe way (not a given, prob needs someone like me to design it lol), less threatened belonging could be part of that answer. It keeps you honest in a way that many other measures don't.