@AlexanderKingsbury and a good day to you sir. 🖖

For other readers, when the rampant crippling of elected governments renders the government incapable of serving the needs of society, the billionaire despot is planted with a convenient scapegoat.

All the libertarians fall silent because the destruction of the administrative state leaves them to do whatever they want, and if that means a few minorities are beaten or imprisoned it's a worthy sacrifice to keep the mobs at bay.

@AlexanderKingsbury okay so for the benefit of others I will say this:

Libertarians don't support those things because they actually care about gay people, sex workers, drug addicts etc. They just support it because they don't care about anyone other than themselves, as libertarianism is based on an egoistic moral system. In summary: "mine, mine mine!"

Not beating or imprisoning vulnerable groups is not morally praiseworthy. Vulnerable people need help from society.

@AlexanderKingsbury I never said libertarians were evil, just what their systems create. Just like communists aren't evil, but their systems create gulags and starvation.

And this isn't a new idea, it has been a theme of sci fi for decades. Alien and Blade Runner for example.

When it happens, libertarians say "oh it's not real libertarianism" just like communists say "it's not real communism" when people are hacked to pieces with machetes because they owned a farm.