Michael W. Cole

298 Followers
360 Following
155 Posts
Associate Professor at Rutgers University, director of a computational, cognitive, and network neuroscience lab – covering neuroimaging, brain connectivity, cognitive control, goal pursuit, cognitive science, AI
The Cole Neurocognition Labhttps://www.colelab.org
Bias Research Initiativehttps://biasresearch.rutgers.edu/
Practically Scientific newsletter/bloghttps://pscientific.substack.com/
Lab’s latest at PLOS Comp Biol, led by Carrisa Cocuzza: “Distributed network flows generate localized category selectivity in human visual cortex”. This one changed how I think the brain works! Even "localized" functions are likely generated by distributed processes https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012507
Distributed network flows generate localized category selectivity in human visual cortex

Author summary A fundamental question in neuroscience has persisted for over a century: to what extent do distributed processes drive brain function? The existence of category-selective regions within visual cortex provides long-standing evidence supporting localized computations, wherein specialized functions (e.g., selective responsiveness to face images) are thought to be primarily generated by within-region processes. This account was recently updated to include category selectivity dispersed across visual cortex, in the absence of category-selective regions. Here we provide groundwork evidence demonstrating that locally-exhibited visual-category-selective responses can be accurately generated via distributed activity flowing over globally connected systems. These processes were simulated via empirically-based computational models initialized by stimulus-evoked activity patterns and empirical connectivity matching each category-selective region’s unique intrinsic functional connectivity fingerprint. Results demonstrate that activity flowing over the human brain’s distributed network architecture can account for the generation of category selectivity in visual cortex regions.

I've been using #AnnotatedEquations in my recent papers. I think it really adds to the readability and understanding of the math.

Here are some examples. It uses #tikz in #latex.

Let me know if you like it. Happy for any feedback.

@cian

That we should be thinking of "multiple memory" as "multiple decision" is an argument I've been making for a few years now. It's the point made in my Mind Within the Brain book (Oxford 2013), which lays out the idea in depth.

The general perspective is that a decision arises from a computation applied to representations of information from the past (memory), information about the present (perception), and information about the future (motivations and goals). One of the most important discoveries in computational science over the last 75 years is that how you represent information changes what you can do with it.

What we find is that there are different algorithms / computational processes that underlie what used to be called multiple memory systems. So, for example, a representation of the structure of the world allows planning, a representation of action-action chains and situation-action chain best-choices allows procedural sequences, etc. Rumination processes allow counterfactual considerations, etc.

Rethinking it all in terms of consequential behavior clarifies a lot of the strange things that happen with memory.

An interesting consequence of the hypothesis that human social structures are built on "assurance" or coordination games rather than prisoner's dilemmas:

Coordination games have two stable states. If you are living in a world where everyone else is cooperating, it is in your best interests to cooperate as well. If you are living in a world of cheaters, cooperation is for suckers.

This means your perception of your community has a big impact on your own behavior.

While I agree that we do need things like @deevybee 's defense against the dark arts and @PubPeer and the enforced "share the data as is" regulations that @BorisBarbour has been talking about, I think we also need to make sure that we CELEBRATE openness, integrity, and we make sure that we report it to the world. We do not want all of our news reports to be about fraud.

So, can I recommend a policy? For every fraud that gets reported, find a positive success to talk about. I *guarantee* they are out there. In fact, I bet they are so common, we don't notice them.

All the people who share their code and fix the bugs that others find. The labs that say "come on by and we'll show you how we do stuff". The people who work with others to make their data useful and not just "out there". There are lots and lots of these positive examples. I worry they get lost because they are so common. We need a hashtag for celebratory cooperation in the sciences. I'm open to suggestions.

PS. For those who don't know it, the coordination game is structured so that for player A (given player B choice): C(C) > D(C) > D(D) > C(D), as compared to the prisoner's dilemma which is: D(C) > C(C) > D(D) > C(D).

In the coordination game, it is best to do what the other player is doing. In the prisoner's dilemma it is best to defect. There are n-player extensions of this as well.

Looking forward to #sfn23 next week!

We've got four posters, scattered across the days.

1. Saturday PM VV (double V) 20: Clarifying proactive and reactive cognitive control deficits in psychosis via drift diffusion modeling

2. Sunday PM NN 12: Probing the role of prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and dorsolateral striatum on decision-making in complex spatial environments

3. Sunday PM OO6: Hippocampal Representations in rats worried about being attacked by a threatening robot in the “robogator” approach-avoidance task

4. Tuesday PM TT9 Network physiology metrics reveal a dynamic balance between excitatory and inhibitory functional connections in rodent prefrontal cortex during decision making

Come check 'em out!

I love #SFN. It's my favorite meeting. I'm looking forward to seeing both old and new friends on the poster floor!

SFN poster 4) Neural representation dynamics reveal computational principles of cognitive task learning” https://abstractsonline.com/pp8/#!/10892/presentation/40404, VV39, Wed 11/15 8am-12pm

If you’re going to SFN please come check out these posters!
N/N

SFN poster 3) “Regularized partial correlation provides reliable functional connectivity estimates while correcting for widespread confounding” https://abstractsonline.com/pp8/#!/10892/presentation/35506, XX42, Mon 11/13 1-5pm

3/N

SFN poster 2) “Rapid learning to automaticity reveals learned content stored within patterns of resting-state functional connectivity changes” https://abstractsonline.com/pp8/#!/10892/presentation/21690, TT28, Sun 11/12 8am-12pm

2/N

The Cole Neurocognition Lab has 4 posters reporting our latest findings at #sfn23

SFN poster 1) “Brain network processes underlying the generation of hundreds of visual category responses in the human brain” https://abstractsonline.com/pp8/#!/10892/presentation/28495, Z2, Sat 11/11 1-5pm A 🧵1/N

The Behavioral & Neural Sciences (BNS) PhD graduate program at Rutgers University is open for applications, due December 15. Lots of great neuroscience labs, faculty, and students here! Please spread the word https://sasn.rutgers.edu/bns-graduate-program
BNS Graduate Program | Rutgers SAS-Newark