Andreas Prokop

282 Followers
77 Following
206 Posts
Cell biology of #neurons: how do #axons survive for as long as we live? Using and promoting the powerhouse #Drosophila melanogaster.
Uni Manchester pagehttps://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/andreas.prokop.html
Manchester Fly Facilityhttps://sites.manchester.ac.uk/fly-facility
Drosophila advocayhttps://droso4public.wordpress.com
Figshare repositorieshttps://figshare.com/authors/Andreas_Prokop/101470
@Poppi62 if you consider the #Obsidentify-App an expert: Steatoda grossa
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steatoda_grossa
A new species and morphological notes on the remarkable termitophilous genus Austrospirachtha Watson from Australia (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae) | Zootaxa

GeneticsCambridge on X

We have 3 post-doc vacancies to join the @SteventonLab! ➡️Research Associate in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration🧑‍🔬 ➡️Research Associate in Zebrafish Imaging, 🐟 ➡️Research Associate in Bioengineering 🧬 🔗https://t.co/kr6Ttx32ls

X (formerly Twitter)
We just found a black/false widow-type spider in the garden. Clearly played dead several times. Any expert opinions?

Tales from the trenches of scientific publishers, back in the 1980s:

"Oh my dear, you have no idea. I spent several years in the 80s as assistant managing editor of a top peer-reviewed medical journal, and what I learned is that profit is the only thing that matters. In the space of a single year, the number of issues and the number of pages per issue were doubled, even as several of the issues were given over entirely to advertising for specific drugs, all without any of the people holding medical degrees -- the titular editor or the peer reviewers or the subscribers -- making a single objection.

The journal was one of 20 technical journals owned by financial advisors Dun & Bradstreet, sold shortly afterward to Reed International, another similar firm. The front offices looked lush, but the editing was done in a warren of mostly windowless rooms by young women with zero medical training. Most of what we did was harass the actual doctors who were supposed to do the peer review, because they didn't care enough to meet deadlines, and then copy edit their barely readable responses to make them meet minimal editorial standards. And nobody noticed the product was shit. The subscriptions were paid automatically by corporations, the issues went straight onto shelves in those offices where they served as decoration. As far as I could tell, the only people other than the primary authors of the studies who ever read those studies and reviews were me and my co-workers.

Escaping that place to work in a serious news organization was the best decision I ever made, even if it involved taking a more than 50% salary cut." – by "AngelaMotorman" at https://old.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/11ymxtq/til_in_1982_scientists_resubmitted_published/jd8lcjq/

#ScientificPublishing #academia #publishing

TIL: In 1982, scientists resubmitted published articles to major psychology journals. Almost none of the reviewers noticed that the articles had already been published, and nearly all of the reviewers said the articles had "serious methodological flaws."

Posted in r/todayilearned by u/Metaright • 159 points and 19 comments

reddit
Erik Clark on Twitter

“📢#JobAlert Research Assistant position in my lab: 🪰🧬🧪🔬#Drosophila #genetics #devbio #imaging In beautiful central Cambridge @GeneticsCam @Cambridge_Uni. Funded by @wellcometrust. More details and to apply: https://t.co/3EOfoPZTCY Deadline 27 August, please RT!”

Twitter
Speaking up for the annoying fruit fly

Some of the most important discoveries made in health and genetic science are thanks to the humble fruit fly.

The Conversation

Our axons survive for 100 yrs through the homeostasis of an interdependent network formed by virtually ALL components that constitute axonal cell biology - and #microtubules are right at the heart of it!

Derailing this homeostasis at any position will trigger axonopathy.

See the detailed review article here: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1236815

How neurons maintain their axons long-term: an integrated view of axon biology and pathology

Axons are processes of neurons, up to a metre long, that form the essential biological cables wiring nervous systems. They must survive, often far away from their cell bodies and up to a century in humans. This requires self-sufficient cell biology including structural proteins, organelles, and membrane trafficking, metabolic, signalling, translational, chaperone, and degradation machinery—all maintaining the homeostasis of energy, lipids, proteins, and signalling networks including reactive oxygen species and calcium. Axon maintenance also involves specialised cytoskeleton including the cortical actin-spectrin corset, and bundles of microtubules that provide the highways for motor-driven transport of components and organelles for virtually all the above-mentioned processes. Here, we aim to provide a conceptual overview of key aspects of axon biology and physiology, and the homeostatic networks they form. This homeostasis can be derailed, causing axonopathies through processes of ageing, trauma, poisoning, inflammation or genetic mutations. To illustrate which malfunctions of organelles or cell biological processes can lead to axonopathies, we focus on axonopathy-linked subcellular defects caused by genetic mutations. Based on these descriptions and backed up by our comprehensive data mining of genes linked to neural disorders, we describe the ‘dependency cycle of local axon homeostasis’ as an integrative model to explain why very different causes can trigger very similar ...

Frontiers
Looking forward to the next @_BSDB_ Wolpert medal talk on Friday at 12.30 @TheCrick: talking about novel concepts for neurodegeneration, powerful uses of @Drosophila and ManFlyFacility's #scicomm initiatives. Thanks to Nic Tapon for organising!